Re: But on further genuflection...
Posted by Southern Man on Jun 04, 2002 at 08:29
(209.102.129.213)Re: But on further genuflection... (bobbapink)
“I want to bore a hole and drop in a self-regulating pebble bed reactor, only without the heavy biological shielding since there aren’t going to be many [any] biologicals around it long enough to worry.”
I can understand eliminating the shielding would be possible if we had the ability to assemble and operate an unmanned reactor. Problem – who assembles it? The problem is finding enough fuel to return explorers. Now we are talking about sending construction crews to build a reactor facility.
“And I don’t know what radioactive steam or repairs you’re talking about.”
Without shielding the steam you generate is going to contain radioactive particles. Drilling a hole in the ground and inserting something to make steam sounds a lot like geothermal power which is know to be very maintenance intensive.
“Hey, if you don't like pebble-bed technology, how 'bout we go with a nice, cute, little Rapid-L reactor instead? “
Great find!!! Much better. How much does it weigh compared to just shipping in the required fuel?
“And hey - I don’t know you well enough to whip out my calculator. You gotta smooze me a bit before I show you that.”
Fair enough. I’ll show you mine if you show me yours. :)
Follow Ups:
- Re: But on further genuflection... bobba 04/6 09:56 (3)
- Re: But on further regurgitation... Southern Man 05/6 08:49 (2)
- Re: But on further regurgitation... Bobba 05/6 12:21 (1)
- Re: But on further speculation... Southern Man 06/6 08:53 (0)