Re: Dear Uncle Al

Posted by
DA Morgan on May 17, 2002 at 16:11
(156.74.250.7)

Re: Dear Uncle Al (Uncle Al)

Thanks.

Does this hold when one entertains additional spatial dimensions and Calabi Yau space?

On another topic ... I am sure you have been closely watching the data related to the possibility that the underlying "constants" of nature may be anything but constant (I posted link at the top of the forum).

I am also sure that you are aware that any whole number can be derived from e, i, and Pi. I am beginning to entertain the thought that perhaps all that there really is is dimensionless numbers. That the numbers we think of as being the bedrock of reality are in fact all derivative.

The one thing it would explain is why calculus, and Heisenberg and quantum mechanics keep coming up with the same basic answer ... nothing is definite ... but perhaps only when viewed through the lens of so-called real numbers.

Your thoughts.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:
Comments:


[ Forum ] [ New Message ]