Re: Global Warming
Posted by bobbapink on May 06, 2002 at 19:25
(208.58.229.208)Re: Global Warming (DA Morgan)
but rather to look for opinions based on not just data, but an understanding of how to interpret the data.
1) Which data. You seem to prefer incomplete data over complete data. That's your choice. Not mine.
2) Who's interpretation? You suggest that the data does not speak for itself. OK, fine. Not all data does. So what criteria should we place on those that interpret. All things being equal (degrees, resume, etc) who should we believe? You said below it isn't a vote issue - and i agree - so, who?
Follow Ups:
- Re: Global Warming DA Morgan 07/5 12:01 (15)
- Re: Global Warming George 07/5 15:08 (14)
- Re: Global Warming DA Morgan 07/5 15:14 (13)
- Re: Global Warming George 07/5 15:43 (12)
- Re: Global Warming Southern Man 09/5 09:01 (4)
- Re: Global Warming DA Morgan 09/5 14:01 (3)
- Re: Global Warming Amaranth Rose 11/5 05:39 (0)
- Re: Global Warming Southern Man 10/5 10:52 (1)
- Re: Global Warming DA Morgan 10/5 11:10 (0)
- Re: Global Warming KB 07/5 15:52 (6)
- Re: Global Warming Amaranth Rose 07/5 16:48 (5)
- Re: Global Warming DA Morgan 07/5 18:44 (4)
- Re: Global Warming: home fires Amaranth Rose 07/5 19:45 (3)
- Re: Global Warming: home fires Bill Gill 07/5 21:18 (2)
- Re: Global Warming: home fires Amaranth Rose 07/5 23:29 (0)
- Re: Global Warming: home fires Amaranth Rose 07/5 23:20 (0)