Re: A picture's worth a thousand words - or - who do you love
Posted by Natalie L. Smith on May 03, 2002 at 11:40
(168.216.205.255)Re: A picture's worth a thousand words - or - who do you love (bobbapink)
As regards the satellite data:
My understanding is that the whole issue with global warming is because of the greenhouse effect from the increasing CO2 concentration in the atmosphere. Now, the point is that the visible and UV radiation from the sun comes down to the earth from the sun and warms the earth's surface. Normally the heat is able to escape back up through the atmosphere, but now it is increasingly being trapped by the CO2. Right? Well, a satellite, I assume, measures the temperature by measuring the IR waves coming up to the satellite from the earth. Isn't the whole point of the greenhouse effect that those waves can no longer travel up and out into space? How high up are the satellites? Wouldn't you expect them to read an incorrectly low reading under greenhouse conditions?
Makes me wonder how high up they run those weather balloons.
Follow Ups:
- Re: A picture's worth a thousand words - or - who do you love Dale 03/5 12:28 (17)
- Re: the shoddy surface temperature network George 03/5 16:45 (16)
- Re: The shoddy SATELLITE temperature network !!! Mike Kremer 07/5 05:12 (3)
- Re: The most recent SATELLITE temperature network !!! George 07/5 07:31 (2)
- Re: The most recent SATELLITE temperature network !!! Mike Kremer 07/5 17:53 (1)
- Re: The most recent SATELLITE temperature network !!! George 07/5 19:30 (0)
- Re: the shoddy surface temperature network DA Morgan 06/5 14:13 (11)
- Re: the shoddy surface temperature network George 06/5 16:21 (10)
- Re: the shoddy surface temperature network DA Morgan 06/5 17:25 (9)
- Re: the shoddy surface temperature network George 06/5 17:45 (8)
- Re: the shoddy surface temperature network DA Morgan 06/5 18:04 (7)
- Re: the shoddy surface temperature network George 06/5 19:14 (6)
- Re: the shoddy surface temperature network DA Morgan 07/5 12:12 (0)
- Re: the shoddy surface temperature network Amaranth Rose 06/5 20:29 (4)
- Re: the shoddy surface temperature network George 06/5 21:09 (3)
- Re: the shoddy surface temperature network DA Morgan 07/5 12:14 (0)
- surface temperature --could be a rant Amaranth Rose 07/5 02:59 (0)
- Re: the shoddy surface temperature network Shasta 07/5 02:09 (0)