Re: probably a stupid question
Posted by Natalie L. Smith on Apr 16, 2002 at 08:59
(168.216.191.61)Re: probably a stupid question (son of spam)
Occam's rasor says that you should always assume the simplest explanation for a phenomenon unless you have a reason to rule it out. It is simpler to assume that a particle that exists (a photon) is capable of interacting with other particles than it is to assume that something that doesn't exist ("lack of") is interacting.
Follow Ups:
- Re: probably a stupid question son of spam 17/4 10:48 (2)
- Re: probably a stupid question Natalie L. Smith 17/4 16:05 (1)
- Re: probably a stupid question son of spam 19/4 11:24 (0)