You miss a very important issue...
Posted by Sparrow on Apr 15, 2002 at 08:45
(209.161.68.91)Re: Changed? (Dogrock)
[Let's see if this turns out right:] If I write a treatise about the effect of gravity using a whole slew of Capitlalistic illustrations [i.e., dropping Krugerrands (sp?) from the window of the Wall Street market] does this invalidate the law of Gravity simply because I choose to be a Socialist?
IOW, can I justify ignoring either a Natural Law or Supernatural Law just because I don't like the messenger???
It could be fatal, in either instance of Laws.
The issue, dogrock, is the validity of the Law.
Back to you.
Follow Ups:
- Re: You miss a very important issue... Dogrock 15/4 19:16 (3)
- "What is truth?" (Quoted) nt Sparrow 15/4 23:03 (2)
- Re: "What is truth?" (Quoted) nt Dogrock 15/4 23:19 (1)
- Re: "What is truth?" (Quoted) nt Sparrow 16/4 09:05 (0)