Re: Discussions with Dan and Rose - Economics VS climatology – a meeting of the sciences?
Posted by Dale on Mar 12, 2002 at 11:22
(204.212.222.21)Re: Discussions with Dan and Rose - Economics VS climatology – a meeting of the sciences? (dogrock)
Maybe shouldn't comment…Never be afraid to comment. The more one comments, the more chance they have of eventually getting something right. See all of my posts. :)
They are both sciences but one is too close to the bone to get wrong, the other we can live with.The question is which is which? But I think I agree that economics is far too important to ignore while the sooner we ignore climatologists the better off we all will be. The economists seem to have a pretty good handle on the macro state and can even get the micro right occasionally. The climatologists seem to take every position at one time or other and then select the correct predictions and ignore the thousands of incorrect ones. That is at best just political "science".
Follow Ups:
- But in the purely theoretical sense... bobbapink 12/3 11:50 (3)
- Re: But in the purely theoretical sense... Dale 13/3 09:22 (1)
- Re: But in the purely theoretical sense... asdf 16/3 15:25 (0)
- Dale can be most funny when most serious dogrock 12/3 14:25 (0)