Re: Discussions with Dan and Rose - Economics VS climatology – a meeting of the sciences?
Posted by dogrock on Mar 11, 2002 at 21:59
(159.134.217.224)Re: Discussions with Dan and Rose - Economics VS climatology – a meeting of the sciences? (bobbapink)
Maybe shouldn't comment, but believe when humans test or examine other humans there is always a problem. And I think there should be. All humans are too subjective to examine each other, we need to understand each other through indirect means. I do not want to be a statistic, thinking I may change tomorrow, I do not want to be classified, who does? It's here lies the anger. They are both sciences but one is too close to the bone to get wrong, the other we can live with. Needs a much longer debate I know.
Follow Ups:
- Re: Discussions with Dan and Rose - Economics VS climatology – a meeting of the sciences? Dale 12/3 11:22 (4)
- But in the purely theoretical sense... bobbapink 12/3 11:50 (3)
- Re: But in the purely theoretical sense... Dale 13/3 09:22 (1)
- Re: But in the purely theoretical sense... asdf 16/3 15:25 (0)
- Dale can be most funny when most serious dogrock 12/3 14:25 (0)