Its the way I tell it, still think there's a case to answer
Posted by dogrock on Mar 05, 2002 at 17:40
(159.134.217.200)Re: Correction (bobbapink)
The force applied to get the object in motion was never included in this type of thought experiment, I'm suggesting the traveling alone produced the changes internally not any initial force applied. But your right about some of the phrasing above. If internal changes take place due to nothing more than being in motion, then it would be like setting a bag of cats in motion in a bag, their activities could change the direction with apologies to all cats out there.
Follow Ups:
- Are you sure it's doing the traveling? bobbapink 05/3 19:01 (14)
- Accelleration can be ruled out in Twin experiment dogrock 05/3 21:34 (13)
- add on dogrock 05/3 21:52 (12)
- Re: add on Mike Kremer 06/3 21:15 (11)
- add on more gravity dogrock 07/3 17:31 (10)
- Re: add on more Mike Kremer 09/3 18:27 (9)
- Re: add on more dogrock 10/3 11:18 (8)
- Sorry not what I'm saying, didn't read it right dogrock 10/3 18:15 (7)
- Re: Sorry not what I'm saying, didn't read it right Dale 11/3 09:04 (2)
- gave it a try. dogrock 11/3 16:23 (1)
- Re: No joke. Dale 12/3 09:57 (0)
- Re: Sorry not what I'm saying, didn't read it right Bill Gill 10/3 21:38 (3)
- Its relevant. Got Dale and Kremer mixed up dogrock 11/3 21:24 (2)
- Re: Its relevant. Got Dale and Kremer mixed up Bill Gill 11/3 21:42 (1)
- ok, about relativity dogrok 11/3 22:16 (0)