Re: The Plight of the Obscure Innovator in Science
Posted by mara on Feb 26, 2002 at 11:23
(170.115.189.110)Re: The Plight of the Obscure Innovator in Science (Dale)
this is a very interesting article.
it seems to me that most of the problem of communicating new science ideas at the present time is the result of the inability of an unknown scientist to publish a paper.
now that some papers are acceptable on the 'web', it may be less of a problem to have non-university associated scientists publishing.
i am most familiar with Mendel, who published in a relatively obscure journal, and of McClintock, who was not recognized for many years. she, also, did not always publish in the most popular journals, but confined some of her publications to small journals.
Follow Ups:
- Re: The Plight of the Obscure Innovator in Science Dale 27/2 09:33 (28)
- Re: The Plight of the Obscure Innovator in Science mara 28/2 11:37 (27)
- Re: FLASH!!! SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY PROVEN WRONG AGAIN!!! Dale 01/3 08:51 (26)
- Re: FLASH!!! SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY PROVEN WRONG AGAIN!!! Shasta 02/3 13:57 (25)
- Re: FLASH!!! SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY PROVEN WRONG AGAIN!!! Dale 03/3 12:01 (24)
- Re: FLASH!!! SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY PROVEN WRONG AGAIN!!! Shasta 04/3 21:33 (19)
- Re: FLASH!!! SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY PROVEN WRONG AGAIN!!! Dale 05/3 10:48 (18)
- Eat more crud, Da-hole. Mom's computer's trace info. Note the 2 different IP adresses, both of which are reserved for private Intranets. Shasta 07/3 21:52 (0)
- Eat crud, Da-hole. My computer's trace info Shasta 07/3 21:50 (0)
- Okay, Shasta, let's see if we can prove this one! Amaranth Rose 07/3 21:43 (0)
- The question, Mister Decatur, Illinois!!! Shasta 07/3 21:43 (0)
- Okay, Shasta, let's see if we can prove this one! Amaranth Rose 07/3 21:39 (0)
- FLASH!!!!! DALE AN IDIOT, READ ALL ABOUT IT!!! Shasta 07/3 21:39 (0)
- Okay, Shasta, let's see if we can prove this one! Amaranth Rose 07/3 21:31 (0)
- FLASH!!! DALE PROVEN WRONG......AGAIN!!!! Shasta 07/3 21:31 (10)
- Let me test that theory number one bobbapink 08/3 11:36 (0)
- Let me test that theory number two bobbapink 08/3 11:36 (8)
- Re: Let me test that theory number two Shasta 09/3 22:40 (0)
- Nope - your proof does not stand bobbapink 08/3 11:38 (6)
- Re: Nope - your proof does not stand Amaranth Rose 08/3 15:01 (5)
- because - note the two posts i made with the same date/time stamp bobbapink 08/3 15:11 (4)
- Sorry, You Wrong Amaranth Rose 08/3 15:42 (3)
- Crow's fine - wish you'd serve[r] some bobbapink 08/3 23:26 (2)
- Re: Crow's fine - wish you'd serve[r] some Amaranth Rose 09/3 03:27 (1)
- I'm just pointing out the facts bobbapink 09/3 10:28 (0)
- What's the matter with you? Amaranth Rose 04/3 21:23 (3)
- Re: And the psychiatrist said "I wonder what he meant by that." Dale 05/3 10:32 (2)
- : Too bad you can't afford a psychiatrist Amaranth Rose 05/3 13:01 (1)
- Re: : As the man would say, you funny. :) (nt) Dale 06/3 09:01 (0)