Re: That was science
Posted by Amaranth Rose on Feb 10, 2002 at 03:21
dialup-55.sentco.net (65.172.150.55)Re: That was science (Dale)
You assume that because I don't repond I "got it" or agree with it? Poor you.
Pointing out your errors would be a full-time job several times over. Most of the time I don't want to waste my time on you.
Follow Ups:
- Re: That was science Dale 10/2 11:54 (3)
- Re: That was science Amaranth Rose 10/2 16:10 (2)
- GOT'CHA'!!! :) (nt) Dale 11/2 07:59 (1)
- Re: GOT'CHA'!!! :) (nt) Shasta 14/2 19:09 (0)