Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online Now
0 members (), 181 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Top Posters(30 Days)
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
N
newton Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
N
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
SIMPLE TEST
IT IS POSSIBLE or NOT possible TO MEASURE RED SHIFT ?


http://i68.tinypic.com/3483bx4.jpg

Q1: Astronomer on moon SEE DOPPLER or NOT ?
Q2: Astronomer on big planet SEE DOPPLER or NOT ?
Q3: Astronomer on moon = Astronomer on BIG PLANET ( the same speed and distance L ) ?

http://i65.tinypic.com/30v2afr.jpg

Q4: Astronomer on Big Planet see Doppler or NOT (em source central position ) ?


EM sourece position is not central (exist distance center----X1)
http://i65.tinypic.com/2rh4bxh.jpg

Q5: Astronomer on moon see Doppler or NOT ?
Q6: Astronomer on Big Planet see Doppler or NOT ?


Below Autocad 2014
( without math this program not works
each drawing we can describe by functions
I'm sorry I'm engineer not math guy )

http://i63.tinypic.com/24bvoft.jpg

Q7: Source 3Hz what is Your opinion Sensor ( astronomer ) see the same Hz ?
Q8: Astronomer see /not see Doppler ?

We have two situations

(left em source is central )
(right - em source is not central X1)

http://i68.tinypic.com/28rl82s.jpg

Q9: We have many observers o1..o2....o(n-1)...on THEY ALL SEE THE SAME Hz ?
Q10:We have many observers o1..o2....o(n-1)...on THEY ALL SEE DIFFERENT RED SHIFT Hz ?
Q11:We have many observers o1..o2....o(n-1)...on THEY ALL SEE ZERO SHIFT Hz ?





EXPERIMENTAL PART ( I MADE TEST IN 2012)

inside 100% Dark box we have BULB and " classical FILM "

http://i64.tinypic.com/2isb1og.jpg


PLEASE NOT REPEAT THIS TEST IN HOME WITHOUT TEACHER smile

(it is very stupid experiment ZERO resoults will be )
my instruments working similar like my brain .....:)

IMPORTANT INFORMATION TO MODERATOR

( I'm sorry below I not showing physics
it is my own opinion supported by theory
( my mather had big tits so I ssack finger better
than Einstein smile

(I love drink Polish Vodka, I sleep with many nice polish girls .... my two daughters ( 2 and 6 ) and wife )

PLEASE DO NOT LEARN THIS
DO NOT REPEAT THIS IN SCHOOL
( WARNING !!! RED LOVE = RED REVOLUTION IN PHYSICS not PHYSICAL LOVE )

DO NOT USE THIS INFORMATIONS
( we have ideal symery right now so we no need IDIOTIC PROBLEMS )

DO NOT SHOW THIS INFORMATIONS TO RUSSIAN ARMY
( someone can DIE during strong Earth Quake)


Dear people from Russia and Chine ( in chine people not have net but I see many entry on my blog from this country )

I know that You read please do not try do this without my help I'm from Poland my family
is close to You - Poland-

dear people from RUSSIA - don't drink during test smile
too much small drink I also prefer )

DANGER !!!
this is not real physics - it is my pseudoscentic ART vision

I'm only engineer 36 yo I EVEN NEVER
TOUCHED EINSTEIN LEG ! ( sorry left leg ) smile
( YOU MUST BE 18 years old to read about test )
Sorry I showing drastic information for relativity


inside 100% Dark box we have BULB and " classical FILM "

http://i64.tinypic.com/2isb1og.jpg

Q12: What is registering FILM Zero , BLUE, RED shift ?
Q13. HOW SHIFT is registering FILM ?

distance Bulb ----Film = L [meters]

L1=1 [meter]
L2=2 [meter]
L3=3 [meter]

HOW DEEP IS RED LOVE TO EINSTEIN ?

A ) L1<L2<L3

L3 stong shift , L2 medium SHIFT , L1 soft shift

B) L1=L2=L3 = ZERO SHIFT ( Michelson Morley I saw this zero many time in TV - in Ligo and in many TV chanel )

C) L1>L2>L3
L1 strong SHIFT , L2 medium SHIFT , L3 soft shift

Q14: Reapect to what Film is registering ZERO SHIFT ?
Q15: Respect to what Film is not registering ZERO SHIFT ?

In 2012 Poland ( city Walbrzych )
Maciej Marosz made first test
camera is registering 200 000 points ( colour , brightness )

http://i68.tinypic.com/2z5vjbd.jpg

Please Compare Marosz's test to Michelson Morley
http://i64.tinypic.com/9kwfwk.jpg

Q16: Do we have ZERO ? or we HAVE DOPPLER ?
Q17: Marosz's test You want to repeat in home ?

ORYGINAL Ytube ( Marosz few minutes after first test )
https://youtu.be/O9k-zidfJZg


CONCLUSION AFTER EXPERIMENT
( I'm sorry below I not showing physics
it is my own opinion supported by theory
PLEASE DO NOT READ THIS AND DO NOT LEARN THIS
this is not real physics - it is my pseudoscentic ART vision )

theory

1600 Galilean relativity /Natural Fall Law

1861 J. C. Maxwell, published his theory of electromagnetic fields and radiation,
which shows that light has momentum and thus can exert pressure on objects.
1901 P. N. Lebedev EXPERIMENTAL EXAMINATION OF LIGHT PRESSURE

2011 Grover Swartzlander first began to examine a revolutionary concept
in optical physics after studying the flight of a moth.
He watched the animal use its wings to create lift, which led to flight.
Swartzlander asked : Could light be used to create the same effect?


EM Pascal Si UNITS system

http://i67.tinypic.com/14dfy2e.jpg


EACH atom on Earth is registering DOPPLER effect
( exist comunication atom's center -----electron)
electron and atom are using EM signals

http://i68.tinypic.com/154zqir.jpg

Atomic Clock - ( I love Mr Mach )
http://i63.tinypic.com/24cf8nn.jpg

Three Brothers without PINK GLASS smile

http://i66.tinypic.com/w2j8f5.jpg



Absolute Doppler informig Us about Aerodynamica for light
http://i67.tinypic.com/4j19b4.jpg


Exist very special EM Preasure
http://i63.tinypic.com/2n71ojl.jpg

Around planet we have IDEAL GAS ?
EM preasure works similar to water ?
http://i68.tinypic.com/14xopc.jpg


Author Maciej Marosz
I'm 36 yo engineer
http://tesla4.blogspot.com

Last edited by newton; 03/14/16 01:26 PM.
.
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
O
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
Marosz I have repeatedly told you I am not interested in your idea when presented like that, why keep referencing me?

You obviously have a learning difficulties because that has been made clear to you on countless occasions.

I really don't care that you think pink aliens bounce gravity death rays off aircraft wings or whatever your junk says in the spam.

I don't get why you bother referencing me in your lunatic spam rants as anything over two sentences or a single picture from you I an never going to read or respond too.

Do you get I didn't even read the spam above, I never bothered to look at it. I told you the only way I would discuss things with you and until you follow the simple rules I set you are wasting your time.

I am willing to discuss science with you but my rules, and I don't do walls of spam as they do not help me understand you. It took about 20 posts for you to understand you could never win a Nobel prize, so I figure if I keep telling you I won't respond to spam posts like that you will eventually work it out.

POST IGNORED

Now my only question was did LIGO get back to you?

Last edited by Orac; 03/14/16 03:31 PM.

I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,570
B
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
B
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,570
Quote:
Now my only question was did LIGO get back to you?


No, but gravity may have waved to him. Could have been waving goodbye, or is that wishful thinking? smile


There never was nothing.

Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact UsokÂþ»­¾W
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5