Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online
0 registered (), 148 Guests and 6 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
GW Expedition canceled ... to much melted ice!
by paul
06/20/17 10:21 AM
Chinese Dogs and Chinese Product Imports
by paul
06/15/17 12:20 PM
Brexit finalized by Queen Elizabeth new UK Gov
by paul
06/15/17 12:05 PM
Top Posters (30 Days)
paul 3
Topic Options
#53349 - 11/08/14 10:12 PM New Gravitation's Model + New EM Aether
newton Offline
Megastar

Registered: 09/30/12
Posts: 1158
I very like prepare models
( I like ask my self " What will be if ?")


New Aether's model


In universe exist N objects
N objects is sending N waves ( Electro-Magetic waves )
Everything is moving ( doppler is mixing " N " special Hz )

How look one cubic meter of space ?
How Many Joules are inside one cubic meters ?



VERY IMPORTANT !!!
above I showed that we can use basic SI units and explain Electro-Magnetic Pascal ! ( it is My Own idea )

Joul / meter^3 = Newton *m/m^3 = N/m^2 ( pascal )


MAROSZ analogy to INVERSE SQUARE LAW we have INVERSE CUBIC LAW



2x more big ball = 8x lower EM preasure

we need use 8x stronger bulb to keep the same EM preasure in biger ball





Gravitaion ?

When You are underwater and we have empty chamber water will go inside very fast
Electrons are moving inside atoms = Electrons joust "Eat" special Hz ( EM wave ) - Electrons joust Eat energy from Aether.

Earth is very big and fast truck !


Czerenkow's radiation and motion inside Aether ?

Below I showing Bernoli's equation and ball underwater ( Ball is making own rotation + motion )
this picture explain famous curve .



Body that is moving joust hiting EM aether ( rotation or line motion ) = Czerenkow's radiation




EM preasure where we will use (short future)
Few weeks ago NASA SHOWED RAPORTS

NASA's raport http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140006052



In 2012 I tested similar Engine in my home Please repeat my test http://youtu.be/cSsTWRt0VBA

TO PREPARE GOOD GRVITATION's MODEL YOU HAVE TO SEE HOW IMPORTANT ARE RADIAL FORCE

http://maroszphysics.blogspot.com/

Top
.
#53352 - 11/09/14 10:42 AM Re: New Gravitation's Model + New EM Aether [Re: newton]
newton Offline
Megastar

Registered: 09/30/12
Posts: 1158




Top
#53357 - 11/10/14 03:59 AM Bulb and Rope = Bulb and Earth motion
newton Offline
Megastar

Registered: 09/30/12
Posts: 1158

very important problem is Air's inertia I have a problem right now


http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Mry0nxUU74M/VGBy5Uta3pI/AAAAAAAACFg/B68sugnYIr4/s1600/MMR.jpg


I'm very open for cooperation

in home I tested 24h Earth's is making rotation in universe !!! !!!


http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-gThxTVotyg0/VE_qRpbPYpI/AAAAAAAACCg/Rt8lAHpo9UY/s1600/CIMG3375.JPG


WHERE IS MY CAMERA IN UNIVERSE ???

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-QAAvQuZjtmI/UOhDTjKm0uI/AAAAAAAAAbU/_g7IkKC_K00/s1600/8x.JPG



Light is pushing objects !!! ( Light Sail in satellite for example )

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xt2orZVnMMY/VF91acc4BFI/AAAAAAAACFM/uHVRtjhKAqk/s1600/pmm.JPG



HUGE PROBLEM FOR ME IS EVALUATE AIR's INERTIA !!!


Where Bulb started 3D signal ?

Where is "now" bulb respect to old own position ?

Exist C+V ( LIGHT IS MOVING WITH BULB ???? )


I LOVE MACH ... I hope You will share my LOVE ...

http://maroszphysics.blogspot.com

Top
#53371 - 11/10/14 10:47 PM Mathematical Evidence False - Michelson Morley.
newton Offline
Megastar

Registered: 09/30/12
Posts: 1158
Secoundary School mathematica
and Evidence Michelson Morley False

author Maciej Marian Marosz ( Poland ,city Walbrzych ) 11-11-2014

if C + V or C- V = TRUE ===> below drawing is FALSE
( EM wave are not able make rotation with bulb respect to hand because not exist C+V)

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Mry0nxUU74M/VGBy5Uta3pI/AAAAAAAACFg/B68sugnYIr4/s1600/MMR.jpg

we are sure that not exist C+V or C - V respect to hand
( bulb is making rotation but EM wave joust making 3D background C speed only )

matematica :
line motion for matematica = rotation with infinity radius ( easy to imagine and evaluate how big mistake we make for each radius )

below rocket is making rotation (infinity radius) - it is analogy to situation
that I showed Bulb -------rope----X .

Light for distance L need time T during this time
rocket is escaping from point 1,2,3,4...

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xt2orZVnMMY/VF91acc4BFI/AAAAAAAACFM/uHVRtjhKAqk/s1600/pmm.JPG

Experiment :

Camera is open 24 h and registering point

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-gThxTVotyg0/VE_qRpbPYpI/AAAAAAAACCg/Rt8lAHpo9UY/s1600/CIMG3375.JPG

X1.....................radius.................camera....1m....doth

I'm sure that me and bulb and camera during 24h test
are making rotation respect to some point X1 ( far far point in universe )

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-QAAvQuZjtmI/UOhDTjKm0uI/AAAAAAAAAbU/_g7IkKC_K00/s1600/8x.JPG

Experiment
Part 1 > http://youtu.be/wkz0qD17IvY Part 2 > http://youtu.be/jjqt7Iz_UDQ

conclusion
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-mF862RHQBNA/VE_qFhdTZTI/AAAAAAAACCY/V3Q8y_GDAGA/s1600/25.jpg

Michelson Morley Made Mistake ( it is FALSE experiment ) we can evaluate Our own constant
linear motion : we need use only C and read L from picture during test

During real experiment I relize that object (doth) is able become biger/shorter

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-arWCkT9Vr04/UwC7Q3qM0uI/AAAAAAAABlI/fJuRtMqUzbw/s1600/x.JPG


more problems in test
http://maroszphysics.blogspot.com/

******************************************************

Mtematyczny Dowód Fałszu Testu Michelson Morley ( szkoła średnia )
( pokazuje również prosty test do wykonania w domu )

Maciej Marian Marosz ( Polaska , Walbrzych 11-11-2014)

Jeśli C + V LUB C- V Istnieje ===> poniższy rysunek jest Fałszywy
( fale EM nie mogą okrążać ręki razem z żarówką bo musiały by mieć prędkość C+V lub C-V względem ręki )

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Mry0nxUU74M/VGBy5Uta3pI/AAAAAAAACFg/B68sugnYIr4/s1600/MMR.jpg

fale EM nie okrążają ręki razem z żarówką
a jedynie tworzą 3D tło ( tylko żarówka okrąża rękę )

Róch liniowy to obrót o nieskończenie długim promieniu ( łatwo to udowodnić i podać pomyłkę (odchyłkę od linii ) dla dowolnego R

poniższa rakieta rotuje na nieskończenie długim promieniu.
to analogiczny przypadek do pokazanej żarówki na linie

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xt2orZVnMMY/VF91acc4BFI/AAAAAAAACFM/uHVRtjhKAqk/s1600/pmm.JPG

światło nadane w punkcie 1,2,3,4... na pokonanie dystansu L potrzebuje czasu T
w czasie tym rakieta pokonuje drogę S . Czoło fali udeży rakietę trochę dalej od lini normalnej

Na zdjęciu pokazałem również że światło odpycha ciała w które uderza
( żagle świetlne stosuje się jako dopalacz obecnych satelitów)
Na rakietę która stoi nieruchomo i porusza się zadziała inny moment siły

Eksperyment
kamera jest nieruhoma i otwarta 24h / rejestruje punkt swiatła który kreśli linie !

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-gThxTVotyg0/VE_qRpbPYpI/AAAAAAAACCg/Rt8lAHpo9UY/s1600/CIMG3375.JPG

X1......................................kamera....1m....kropka

Jestem pewien że kamera i żarówka w czasie 24 godzinnego testu wykonuje obrót
względem odległego punktu w przestrzeni X1

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-QAAvQuZjtmI/UOhDTjKm0uI/AAAAAAAAAbU/_g7IkKC_K00/s1600/8x.JPG

EKSPERYMENT

Cz 1 > http://youtu.be/dNveMtyYHaU Cz2 > http://youtu.be/jjqt7Iz_UDQ


Wniosek
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-mF862RHQBNA/VE_qFhdTZTI/AAAAAAAACCY/V3Q8y_GDAGA/s1600/25.jpg

Michelson Morley to fałszywy eksperyment możemy okreslić dystans L
i wyznaczyć swoją prędkość stałą na podstawie stałej C i Odczytanego ze zdjęcia L
w czsie testu odnotowałem również inny fakt obserwowany obiekt może być
większy mniejszy dla matrycy aparatu

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-arWCkT9Vr04/UwC7Q3qM0uI/AAAAAAAABlI/fJuRtMqUzbw/s1600/x.JPG


więcej problemów :
http://maroszphysics.blogspot.com

Top
#53407 - 11/19/14 04:37 AM NEW NATURAL FALL LOW
newton Offline
Megastar

Registered: 09/30/12
Posts: 1158


Above Law is for N objects
Can we use it for 2 objects ?

Folow the rules or break them ALL


http://maroszphysics.blogspot.com


Edited by newton (11/19/14 05:33 AM)

Top



Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor
Facebook

We're on Facebook
Join Our Group

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact Us
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.