Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online Now
0 members (), 181 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Top Posters(30 Days)
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
N
newton Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
N
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
Dr ILUK works for Technical University of Wroclaw
his Boss Russinski

I graduate above school in 2008

I described my system and I informed Rusinski by e- mail
He told me please speak with ILUK .

right now we have new patent ? who is author ?

In my mail I showed ILuk redirection tool !!! I have evidence

in Linkd In I showing "my stupid picture - Orac you are using this definition - for me it is many pipes end perpendicular direction to ship and proportion 300 - 400 metres 1m x 1m)

Iluk told me You are idiot all is easy !!
!
Linked In - abiut new PATENT - redirection tool

Last edited by newton; 04/25/14 01:12 PM.
.
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
O
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
ROFL sure he did ... another lie really please when will you learn to try telling the truth.

I tried pulling Dr Iluk up on the academic roster for Wroclaw University because I thought I might be able to get him to intervene with you imagine my surprise when no such staff member exists.

What is even funnier I then tried to contact Eugeniusz Rusinski do you want to guess what my problem was smile

Here let me give you his details contact him

Vice-Rector for Research
Professor Eugeniusz Rusinski; Ph.D., D.Sc.
tel. +48 71 320 27 30, 328 59 85
e-mail: eugeniusz.rusinski@pwr.wroc.pl


So tell you what ask Dr ILUK to come post here show us you are telling the truth for once because for some reason he isn't on the staff list at the university. Hell get Prof Rusinski to come and have a chat the more the merrier.

With my background did you really think I wouldn't contact these people Marosz?

I love a chat with scientists I don't need much of an excuse smile

Is this like you working with armies .. well you post on defense forums but I am not sure that counts
http://www.defencetalk.com/forums/space-...z-poland-13015/

So have you worked out who you work for yet is it Toyota, Armies or some secret organisation?

You have posted you work for 3 different things in the past 2 weeks alone smile

Oh and wait you are an engineer ... only your a CNC machine engineer in other words not an engineer at all.

I personally don't think you actually know what the truth looks like anymore.

LIES LIES AND MORE LIES.

Last edited by Orac; 04/25/14 03:26 PM.

I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
N
newton Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
N
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
Artur Iluk
Associate Professor
Researcher
Wroclaw University of Technolo...
· Faculty of Mechanical Engineering

http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Artur_Iluk


about 4 Years ago I informed DR Iluk about new tool

I saw this problem when I was 13 years old boy ( grandfather showed me below problem - people like me had nice family my grandfather was great techer father also RED SYSTEM WAS PROBLEM )


Marosz's observation Garden and holes in pipe with water


water in (M) >>> ---V----V---V---V----V--- >>> (m ) water out

I wrote Mr Iluk please see :

Water in = Mass M
water out = mass m

V = places where water escape perpendicular to Earth

each V step preasure is going down
m water ( out ) not has got the same Energy and mass
what M water ( in )

it is natural that we will not have reaction


force F1 >>> ----V----V----V----V---- >>> F2 reaction

F1>F2

the principle of conservation of momentum ???

schould be that F1=F2 ! ( Newton III - action F1 and Reaction F2 ??? )



In my mail I showed DR ILUK more ...
If he is smart and if he will be gentelman he schould not
speak about my own idea with other people ( I hope he will not do this ... if Yes i will make him more problems.. )


Orac do You understand F1 = F2 or F1>F2

where energy is going ?
perpendicular to motion


You can read about patent in Chine

http://www.brightstartechinc.com/innovative-technology.html
"Hydrokinetic redirection "


for me liquid = past I have much more better solution
right now BUT 5 years befor above patent I made drawing

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-S_zwj0qNmyA/UzY_PpyHHiI/AAAAAAAABm8/Uv5JG1rjslQ/s1600/ship.jpg

on linkedin You can read about TIPS that I gived to one person ( about redirection tool )


Please stop use this :
LIES LIES AND MORE LIES.

please study F1=F2 or F1>F2

PHYSICS right now = LIES LIES !!! and You I don't know why want to show people that I Lie

about my posts in web ( sometimes I'm very tired Orac - people like You = very special resistance - more easy is create and make new tool or discovery )

In future I would like to read books and create ...
and not speak with idiots who call them self physicist

You want to speak about athom smile :):)
You want to do this theoreticly on paper
( good luck QUNTUM IDIOTICUM )


please study about radial forces! You can ask ILUK at first I fought that he is Idiot like You and not understand nothing now I will look on his steps ... his job can not be my job




MR LAGIEWKA POLAND
3 WAY ENERGY ESCAPE !!!!


http://youtu.be/FgsJrimgPiQ


Dear Cmbridge MR Smith Copied Idea without understand Problem
it Is new physics and HE Lie people about that HE can describe all by mathematica & physics from books

Me Maciej Marosz can learn You where is Your mistake

I no need court in UK

I will get Nobel prize
for That I showed about FACAULT Pendulum

EN
http://youtu.be/LZwQC26nrG8

PL
http://youtu.be/RGAlAyVm5sA

I not only speak about theory on my page TURBINES

I will get Nobel prize
for test that I made in home
Michelson Morley TALES
( 2012 POLAND I measured absolute Earth's motion )


I will call to F1 team but RENAULT or other opposite to Mercedes MC laren !!!

and I WIll prepare car
MY CAR WILL BE BETTER MY SUSSPENSION .... Mr smith will recive my first prototype on desk ( you can ask him about opinion how it work smile ... he will tell You ... this what he will be he even can not copy !:) smile !!


I CAN ADD ASLO OTHER SYSTEMS TO CAR
NOT ONLY SUSSPENSION smile

CAR CAN HIT IN WALL 120 km/h
and i will drink cofee with driver

CABRIDGE ? it is that place where
MR Smith works not nice place for study true


...come on professore schould Understand what he copied !!!
Dr Mr Smith to understand physics please study Mr Lagiewka's words ...

author can tell you more about own tool why ? and how ?

For You F1 = F2 ? good ... Yes
for media and public opinion yes .

ORAC SMALL tips for YOU high preasure = wave
I showed You Inverse square Law many times I will show one more ( where high preasure wave started how long is pipe in garden how many points where pipe is open )

[img]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-dS-cUmBntzA/UoRVdV1-UdI/AAAAAAAABQQ/TF91UPHWIk8/s1600/1aaa.JPG [/img]

Books not always have real data ! special if we speak about inertia ( mass m and rotation ) Mr Smith understand what I talking about here because before He made tool for F1 He
studied constants that we Engineers see in books smile

Mr Smith what is wrong!? about rotation we have many datas that are not able use in real live ( somone joust make mathematical analogy copy for many masses !!! the same )

please not make joke ...
students can copy but proffesore ??? ...
CAMBRIDGE ...???? F.... what is happen with this world

I'm not so rich like Mr Smith
I not have so many friends

I was born in POLAND small coutry
where we have Huge coruption !!!

but You know what GOLIAT lose with David
because David use radial forces

Bible
David's tool = first radial engine NEW TYPE ! study please study MR HAWKING GOD ...

EN
http://youtu.be/LZwQC26nrG8

PL
http://youtu.be/RGAlAyVm5sA




Last edited by newton; 04/25/14 04:57 PM.
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
O
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
Originally Posted By: Newton
I don't know why want to show people that I Lie


It goes the background of how believable anything you say is it is your REPUTATION of how reliable and truthful anything you say is.

I have just e-mailed Artur Iluk to introduce myself what do you think he is going to tell me about you?

2 posts ago you claimed Dr Iluk just called me an idiot and now it is 4 years ago .... which is it ... sorry was that yet another lie?

Seriously do you want me to pick all the lies of the post above?


Lets also deal with repeat stupidity

Marosz => I will get Nobel prize

How many times do you need to be told you can't win a Nobel prize you simply are not eligible.


Lets do a truth test Marosz lets see if you can not lie for once.

FOUR SIMPLE QUESTIONS

1.) Do you work on production line a Toyota, for an army or for a secret organization.

2.) Are any armies or companies actively working with you on your theory.

3.) Is there actually anybody who is collaborating with you on your theory.

4.) Can Marosz win a Nobel prize?

Last edited by Orac; 04/25/14 05:24 PM.

I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
N
newton Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
N
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
ORAC stop mIX


F1 = F2

or F1>F2

Physics speak about physics !!!




about 4 Years ago I informed DR Iluk about new tool

I saw this problem when I was 13 years old boy ( grandfather showed me below problem - people like me had nice family my grandfather was great techer father also RED SYSTEM WAS PROBLEM )


Marosz's observation
Garden and holes in pipe with water



water in (M) >>> ---V----V---V---V----V--- >>> (m) water out



Water in = Mass M

water out = mass m

V = holes where water escape perpendicular to Earth

each V step dynamic preasure is going down

m water ( out ) not has got the same Energy and mass
what M water ( in )

it is natural that we will not have reaction


force F1 >>> ----V----V----V----V---- >>> F2 reaction

F1>F2

the principle of conservation of momentum ???

schould be that F1=F2 !

( Newton III - action F1 and Reaction F2 ??? )


YOU WANT TO SPEAK ABOUT QUANTUM AND ATHOMS smile
SOLVE ABOVE PROBLEM .... after all we will be speak about athom


here is rotation redirection problem



V- holes inside pipe can be very inteligent holes !!!
( please notice that you speak here with Engineer not Monkey spring 1 and spring 2 = very precission ajustable tool - special if we will use Air preasure to steering )


PL > http://youtu.be/YI2Vqf9TFi4
EN > http://youtu.be/iTQweoVZspc


CLASSICAL MASS VERSION and above

EN
http://youtu.be/LZwQC26nrG8

PL
http://youtu.be/RGAlAyVm5sA


ORAC ARE YOU MONKEY ???? or parrot ???

You use head like a monkey but you repeat like parrot !

SHOW ME HERE THAT YOU
ARE SOMEONE WHO GRADUATE HIGH SCHOOL

EXPLAIN US HERE MISTAKE !!!
SHOW HERE YOUR ARGUMENTS AND EQUATIONS
not f... links from web ...

OR STOP SPEAK ABOUT PHYSICS
( you can not understund
simple experiment I was only 13 years old boy !!)

COME ONE I'm IDIOT show me Your equations
(tip for You go and ask somone in OBI how it works smile


better way is read about new PATENT ( redirection tool pipes and water inside )

http://www.brightstartechinc.com/innovative-technology.html

You schould understand pendulum and Einsten's rocket problem
not ask about all person in OBI You can write e-mail to ILUK 1/4 + 1/4 = 0,5 Your chances rise !!! !!!:)

AFTER YOU WILL FINISH WRITE YOUR EQUATIONS
YOU WILL UNDERSTAND ACTUAL PHYSICS LEVEL IN THIS AREA

Last edited by newton; 04/25/14 06:07 PM.
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
O
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
I have already told you the answer with a >>> GYROSCOPE <<<

BUT YOU JUST IGNORE THE ANSWER BECAUSE YOU DON'T LIKE IT


WHY DO YOU KEEP ASKING ME TO EXPLAIN YOU ARE WRONG WHEN YOU JUST IGNORE THE BLATANTLY OBVIOUS

It's pretty easy to work out the problem here in another site you posted look at Tinu's answer and he was willing to believe you

http://www.overunity.com/14484/veni-vidi...5/#.U1qTRaKXYQo

Originally Posted By: Tinu
If the device is to perform as advertised (which I strongly doubt), it should weight less (or more), depending on where the fan is positioned. That would be easily provable with a scale. Or, in another configuration, the effect would lead the device to deflect from the vertical with an angle, easily observable too. I’d like to see either case proved. It should be fairly easy, shouldn’t it?


If the forces worked as like what you say the devices would kick over which I explained is what a gyroscope would do if your formula was correct.

Gyroscopes and none of your devices lean over do they????

You liquid radial turbine won't either smile

Hence your formula is wrong!!!!

Air or liquid turbine they should both do the same thing it's dead easy to test like really really simple.

I don't have to bother arguing where your error is which has also been explained again Tinu worked it out correctly in 2 minutes.

Originally Posted By: Tinu
So, although the generic formulas are ok, I’d say it does not serve your purposes in the way you use them in their scalar form... On contrary, they are misleading you toward the wrong conclusion.


Forces vectors don't add like you are simplistically trying.

Anyone who has done basic physics will see the problem in like 2 minutes tops because your formulas predict a result we don't see EVER IN OUR UNIVERSE.

Having said all that you will just ignore it and the fact none of these devices lean over like your theory predicts and continue dribbling rubbish. Your reaction will be to post more garbage rather than look at the problem and work out your error.

That is why I don't bother answering answering you .. the answer is staring you in the face you just want to ignore it I don't even have to write the full version of the equations properly.

Understand now you are trying to argue against a visible fact and that is why everyone calling you an idiot.

So I answered you question now how about you answer my 4 questions above please

Last edited by Orac; 04/25/14 06:45 PM.

I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
N
newton Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
N
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
GYROSCOPE ???

Marosz's observation
Garden and holes in pipe with water


water in (M) >>> ---V----V---V---V----V--- >>> (m) water out



Water in = Mass M

water out = mass m

V = holes where water escape perpendicular to Earth

each V step dynamic preasure is going down

m water ( out ) not has got the same Energy and mass
what M water ( in )

it is natural that we will not have reaction


force F1 >>> ----V----V----V----V---- >>> F2 reaction

F1>F2

the principle of conservation of momentum ???

schould be that F1=F2 !

( Newton III - action F1 and Reaction F2 ??? )

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
O
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
See as predicted you just ignore the problem ... here let me dumb it down for you on a gyroscope

This is what your formulas say should happen



Therefore anything spinning should tilt over at 90 degree to the direction of motion ... that is what the formula says.

So we should be able to tell the earth is spinning and moving because a gyroscope should tilt over like a compass at about 10 degrees to the direction of movement.

Trust me that is the tip of a very large number of problems and how we know your formula is garbage and not worth arguing with you ... and why you get banned off science sites.

It's not hard I think I have seen 6 or 7 people tell you the problem but you just ignore it.

Do you really think anyone could miss that effect ... REALLY ... NOT EXACTLY HARD TO TEST and it will lean a long way over.

Last edited by Orac; 04/25/14 07:09 PM.

I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
N
newton Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
N
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
Sorry i schould read more precission

my last two Ytube I showing Symetry and Asymetry sytuation

***************

very easy and good know rules for sportsman
( 100 m run - sprint )

...person 1 --->
person 2--->

Person 2 need use much more energy for the same resoults

***************


ORAC please speak only about Ytube
pause and told me here is problem

YOu will understand all

EN
http://youtu.be/LZwQC26nrG8

PL
http://youtu.be/RGAlAyVm5sA

Thank You for try understand next step I don't know ?

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
O
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
I am sorry I don't understand there is nothing I have to understand the results say everything and you can't fix it the problems get worse in more tests we do. You video has an obvious error now see if you can find it without me having to show you.

So please just stop bothering trying to discuss this rubbish with me go and see if you can convince someone else because you will never convince me or any scientist.

It's like your whole thing with light which you really have no idea on how it actually works and we can't help because you won't listen or look at the actual experiments which are as obvious that you are wrong as the above test.

So End of story.

I am happy to discuss general things with you so long as you are truthful but this subject is closed for the obvious reason that the whole idea is stupid and not worth wasting time on. If you think and do tests truthfully your errors will become obvious.

Last edited by Orac; 04/25/14 07:28 PM.

I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
N
newton Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
N
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
FORCE F1 = F2 or not !?!

Marosz's observation
Garden and holes in pipe with water







A hydroponic garden uses the 10 m long perforated pipe system shown below to deliver water at 20 degrees Celsius. The pipe is 5 cm in diameter and contains a circular hole every 20 cm. A pump delivers water at 75 kPa (gauge pressure) at the entrance, while the other end of the pipe is closed. You should know that the pressure near the closed end of the perforated "manifold" is surprisingly high, and there will therefore be too much flow through the holes near the end if the holes are equally sized. One remedy is to vary the hole size along the pipe axis. Make a design analysis to pick the optimum hole size distribution that will make the discharge flow rate as uniform as possible along the pipe axis. You are constrained to pick hole sizes that correspond only to commercial (numbered) metric drill-bits available to a typical machine shop.

ORAC not so many people understand that above we have Inverse Square LAW



More far from place where signal started = lower intensity of signal ( "lower brightness" )

1R = X , 2R = X/4 , 3R = X/9
X- brightness, R- radius

the same energy portion but different area

Trust Me that very important is pipe's LONG
Holes diameter ( we can play many parameters )

ORAC inverse Square Law !!! above picture I showed You many times !!! LIGHT or HIGH PREASURE or GRAWITATION it is very important LAW please learn smile

How Look Energy In the universe (light /gravitation )
not exist C+ 30 km/s exist only C !!!



*********************************************************

You are pushing piston no1 ( F1 ) force
at the End of pipe piston no2 is pushing mass X

force F1 >>> ----V----V----V----V---- >>> F2 Mas X

F1>F2 or F1=F2 or F1<F2

the principle of conservation of momentum ???
schould be that F1=F2 !

( Newton III - action F1 and Reaction F2 ??? )

SMALL HELP TO ORAC PLASE NOT FORGETT ABOUT
MICHELSON MORLEY - MAROSZ VERSION ! PHYSICS LIKE ANALOGY SHOW ME QUNTUM MECHANIC IN REAL WORLD CAN YOU ?


Last edited by newton; 04/25/14 10:44 PM.
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
N
newton Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
N
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
SYMERTY or ASYMETRY ?

It is impossible for single pendulum to find symetry

we can only try find symetry
but only if we have two pendulums !

( not exist two the same pendulums on the Earth !!! I'm 100 % sure )


EN
http://youtu.be/LZwQC26nrG8

PL
http://youtu.be/RGAlAyVm5sA

conclusion
Pendulum = modern radial turbine !!!

Last edited by newton; 04/25/14 10:00 PM.
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
N
newton Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
N
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
Radial Forces
the same OIL PORTION is going to left and to right pipe
spring 1 and spring 2 adjust equale flow in pipes




EN > http://youtu.be/iTQweoVZspc
PL > http://youtu.be/YI2Vqf9TFi4


INVERSE SQUARE LAW IN MY TURBINES







http://marosz-physics.blogspot.com/


Last edited by newton; 04/25/14 10:48 PM.
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
N
newton Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
N
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
GYROSCOPE ?



ABOVE YOUR DRAWINGs AND EXPLANATIONS

WHAT IS THIS ? YOUR PLAN HOW TO MIX INFORMATION ON FORUM


ORAC here is link about people like YOU
http://abstrusegoose.com/564



Last edited by newton; 04/25/14 09:36 PM.
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 962
Superstar
Offline
Superstar
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 962
Good use of computer graphics. It makes it much easier to see what you are portraying. Much better than the little chalk board. Congratulations on moving to computer graphics.


If you don't care for reality, just wait a while; another will be along shortly. --A Rose

Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
N
newton Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
N
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
ORAC above Three post I dedicate to You and similar people

before You want to use mathematica ask Your self why !!!

please study above three problems or other people will
show You True "it could be not so nice for You "

You are human ? you feel shame ? !

Last edited by newton; 04/25/14 10:08 PM.
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
O
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
I see some realization has struck home with all the random responses smile

Rose the graphic was mine that is why it makes sense it was an attempt to meet Marosz in his drawing world. Look back up above all the spam posts, no he hasn't suddenly worked out how to draw concepts smile

Rose having now found himself stuck his reaction will be to spam post this thread to try an make sure he has a pile of his rubbish at the bottom because in his childlike mind if his stuff is at the bottom people will believe him smile

Marosz the only way to fix your problem of things leaning over is to move the force to the centre point but then your turbine won't work and we have a whole pile of other physics that doesn't work ... you are in a dead end laugh

Sorry it really is the end of your theory in science and I think the end of our discussion .... science and I can't help you.

I think that makes me about the 8th person to tell you these facts but as they could not get thru to you I don't expect to either as I suspect you need your theory to somehow feel special given your life it is somewhat understandable. Unfortunately the path you have chosen leads nowhere no fame, no money and no job.

THE END.

Last edited by Orac; 04/26/14 04:13 AM.

I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
N
newton Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
N
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
ORAC
Marosz the only way to fix your problem of things leaning over is to move the force to the centre point but then your turbine won't work and we have a whole pile of other physics that doesn't work ... you are in a dead end laugh

MAROSZ
Orac be more proffesional : "Superposition principle"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle

first month "Machine Engineer basic curse in Poland "
You can put all forces to center or any other point

ABOUT F1 >F2 or F1 = F2 or F1<F2 holes in pipe full of water

below proffesional Experiment not my own ( THANK YOU MR LAGIEWKA FOR YOUR JOB )

ask your self why ? Why energy not pushed mass M ?

http://youtu.be/FgsJrimgPiQ


(Please e-mail to MR Smith from CAMBRIDGE ! show Him this post he can call to POLICE and told that I LIE
CAMBRIDGE .. ?

I'm sory I can not tell You here nice words about instytution where work people who copied without understand what is it ... DEAR MR SMITH I and LAGIEWKA = HUGE FUTURE what can I tell you more study please there is many new applications smile Oh ... I can make better susspension to F1 please Mr Smith contact me with Your friends from F1 ... look we can add many new details to engine or cocpit we can cooperate smile You have friends me TALENT and new PHYSICS smile please never reverse relation between US in YOUR publications!!! BR Maciej Marosz - polish Engineer http://tesla4.blogspot.com



GREAT EXPERIMENT

M ----> V {..... PIPE WATER/AIR ......} M ---> V1

M*V > M*V1


perpendicular direction ? what You see in Ytube ?
Earth take force and small mass m take the same force .
perpendicular direction is not important !!!




ORAC above You have experiment ( Not Laboratory in CAMBRIDGE not LIGO and 300 000 000 USD but real part of physics and very important for physics words )





INVERSE SQUARE LAW IS INSIDE MY NEW TURBINES
Marosz's radial turbines and explain why F1>F2 - pipe holes and water / air inside



INVERSE SQUARE LAW I CAN USE TO REPEAT MICHELSON MORLEY AND HAVE COMPASS



INVERSE SQUARE LAW I CAN EXPLAIN YOU WHY WE HAVE WINTER AND SUMMER



INVERSE SQUARE LAW we can add one more important sentence to GALLILEO's NATURAL FALL DOWN LAW -




INVERSE SQUARE LAW EINSTEIN made flat Gravitation model !!! in his rocket not exist different Intensity



INVERSE SQUARE LAW WE MUST ADD INFORMATION ABOUT CONSTANT MOTION TO NEWTON's EQUATION ===> MOTION is able change intensity of gravitation forces



INVERSE SQUARE LAW NEW GPS SYSTEM THAT WILL EXPLAIN PEOPLE OUR POSITION IN TE UNIVERSE LIGHT version Michelson morley test




INVERSE SQUARE LAW ... ATHOM MODEL EXPLAIN AND GRAVITATION ELLIPSE EXPLAIN ORAC I SHOWED YOU HYDROGEN PICTIURE




INVERSE SQUARE LAW ... Airplane can esape from point where started sound Marosz Mass M can escape from place where started own gravitation signal - first step to supergravitation speed and long distance trip in space




INVERSE SQUARE LAW ... Marosz explained Our Biology CLOCK problem !!! why atomic clock not work the same way near Earth and Inside train that is moving - MArosz Three brothers paradox

Last edited by newton; 04/26/14 10:17 AM.
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
O
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
Haha I win Rose.

What more lies again Morsz you really don't learn do you laugh

I see another person picked up the gyro problem that makes 9 smile
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?129845-This-turbine-future-for-space-(-new-physics-)

However I did laugh at this one
Quote:
ms paint style artwork bundled with uncomprehensive language isn't enough to sell it.

I was sad they closed the thread and sent you back to us cry

Anyhow really I am done not interested at all I have wasted more than enough time on this ... lets see how you go over the next few years smile

For some reason you think we should care what you think ... but sorry we just don't ... spam on son don't hold back I leave you to it and your new job with Mr Lagiewka he is the best fit for you laugh

Last edited by Orac; 04/26/14 02:17 PM.

I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 6
W
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
W
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 6
Sorry - need help - would like to post, don't see a "post" button. How can I do that?

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact UsokÂþ»­¾W
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5