Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online Now
0 members (), 619 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Top Posters(30 Days)
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
N
newton Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
N
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
DO YOU SEE SPAM in below test ?

post Your replay "YES" "NOT"






rope is very narrow and stresed by heavy battery
radius R ( about 20 cm ) I plan huge weel ( 1m radius )

it is very easy describe why above tool make rotation
after turn on battery

electrons -----> <------ tool oposite rotation


Very intresting is RADIAL FORCES efect ( SPRITE = mass m )
if we have rotation we have motion


single long rope eliminate Earth as a support for body
above engine is able give energy to spaceship in vacuum
and in zero gravitation condition


WHAT WE HAVE IN BOOKS ABOUT ABOVE TOOL :

principle of angular momentum
the principle of conservation of momentum


Orac we wait here for Your links with old NEWTON smile and QUANTUM version of my machine smile

Below picure explin all

electrons = small mass m

we have radial forces

( important is diameter different I showed two wires ) different diameter = different resistance
electrons want to speed up but they have different speed


raial force = F = mV*V/R

m electron mass
V electron line speed
R radius ( 20 cm )



FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN PHYSICS MUST BE STUDY AGAIN

in one POLISH FORUM I PROVED THAT MY TOOL WORK SIMILAR LIKE INVERSE SQUARE LAW ( classical mechanic version )

2x pipe diameter diferent = 4 x radial forcess different
4x pipe diameter diferent = 16 x radial forcess different
....

http://youtu.be/Nx6wvh0K37M

polish forum
http://fizyczny.net/viewtopic.php?p=202890#202890


GENERALY V*V is more important
for physics and Universe than m*V

The same INVERSE SQUARE LAW I showed in my test
MICHELSON MORLEY TALES ( we can measure absolute Erth speed )

Inverse Square Law is vary important tool that we have

http://youtu.be/tTSXLOEKy5E


1930 TOLMAN BRIGHTNESS TEST VERY GOOD EXAMPLE .

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tolman_surface_brightness_test


IN POLAND EXIST ALSO OTHER GOOD INVENTOR MR LUCJAN LAGIEWKA
HE ASLO CLAIMED THAT HIS MACHINE USE V*V physics !!!

http://youtu.be/4_5oseSVUc4


ARMY IS HAPPY WHEN SEE SIMILAR PEOPLE TO ME AND LAGIEWKA
AND TESLA !!!
OTHER PEOPLE AND ORAC see SPAM smile

more about my test ( I will prepare more biger radius to beter show my efect ) I neeed ask someone from my old school
there is TOWER 15 meters

http://marosz-physics.blogspot.com/


Last edited by newton; 04/06/14 02:22 PM.
.
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
O
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
As I said I have no intention of ever discussing your idea again but since you bought up Mr LUCJAN LAGIEWKA it is worth telling you what will happen to his patent in USA, UK and Australia which all have similar patent laws. The status in other countries will depend on each countries patent laws.

LUCJAN LAGIEWKA will unfortunately be denied a patent on his invention on those 3 countries even though he without doubt attempted to patent the idea first.

The reason is simple the patent laws work under a very simple system here is the guidelines

http://www.uspto.gov/inventors/patents.jsp

Here are the three big points:

What cannot be patented:

=> Abstract ideas

Invention must also be:

=>Adequately described or enabled (for one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention)
=>Claimed by the inventor in clear and definite terms


As you know the idea was later patented and accepted by Oxford University professor Malcolm Smith and ended up on F1 cars as a J-Damper.

Unfortunately LUCJAN LAGIEWKA claims the device breaks Newtons laws of physics and hence he has massive problems with patent laws as professor Malcolm Smith's patent clearly shows the device conforms to all the normal laws of physics.

The judgement of the patent office in those three countries will therefore rule against LUCJAN LAGIEWKA on the three grounds

1. His design is an abstract idea (the physics is wrong)
2. He does not adequately described the invention (the physics is wrong)
3. He has not claimed the invention in clear and definite terms (the physics is wrong)

Having got all the theory wrong his only hope would therefore have been to demonstrate a working version of the device to the patent office prior to Prof Smiths patent which he didn't do. There is argument that may be the fault of the polish patent office but that will not change the outcome in other countries and will be a legal matter between him and the polish patent office.

The patent will be almost certainly be upheld in those 3 countries to belong to professor Malcolm Smith who correctly describes the correct physics and demonstrated it. That is why no car manufacturers or companies are interested in discussing it with LUCJAN LAGIEWKA because he won't be able to even sell the product in those countries as Prof Smith's patent will exist there. At this stage I think the best LUCJAN LAGIEWKA can hope for is the patent will be granted in Poland and parts of Europe but I even doubt that.

I do feel sorry for LUCJAN LAGIEWKA but the patent law is very specific on these matters. It is not like Professor Smith stole the idea you have two people arrive at the same invention a few years apart it appears they knew nothing of each others work and certainly LUCJAN LAGIEWKA never published his idea anywhere.

There is a huge lesson in that for you Maciej Marosz

I can guess your reaction it is all a huge conspiracy laugh

Sorry in patent law theory and mathematics is everything in the absence of a fully working invention smile

Last edited by Orac; 04/07/14 07:06 AM.

I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
N
newton Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
N
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
ORAC You are smart below arguments will be very natural
for You we can open books "physics" and confirm step by step all

Thank you for speak more loud not about Engine many people can use my idea to make many new patents.

Br Maciej not Idiot and not spamer .

http://youtu.be/Aazwjy3n-fg


"FLUID " / "P&#321;YN"




Electric version "UFO"



07 of April 2014 PHYSICS LOVES ANALOGY ...
Electric system KIRCHOFFE & FLUID COOPERATE ( ask Your self - electrons mass and nombers and electrons drift's speed

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drift_velocity


INERTIA PROBLEM

http://youtu.be/RXz9KTwvEz8




ORAC DO YOU SEE ABOVE POST ?

PROBLEM THAT I WANT TO SOLVE IN SHORT FUTURE
(reason why I want to made rotation pendulum )
http://youtu.be/1HWsvZdMBek

F= ma ?

<--mv ----->MV ?

???????

ALL WORKS AND IT IS CLEARE INVERSE SQUARE LAW
(nombers of electrons inside small wire - please compare to big wire )

below test = new story about all in physics
http://youtu.be/tTSXLOEKy5E

Galileo natural fall down
http://youtu.be/BsU4WupoaG4

Why we have winter Summer
http://youtu.be/BsU4WupoaG4



author : http://tesla4.blogspot.com


Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact UsokÂþ»­¾W
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5