Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Search Forums
Custom Search
Who's Online
1 registered (samwik), 103 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Mars CO2 atmosphere = COLD
by samwik
15 minutes 47 seconds ago
july cold snap next week
by Bill S.
Today at 11:44 AM
Incentives don't always work
by Amaranth Rose II
07/26/14 11:10 PM
ZOMBIE SPREAD WORLDWIDE EPIDEMIC?
by paul
07/26/14 01:33 PM
Philosophy of Religions--all religions, including,
by Revlgking
07/24/14 01:35 PM
KEROSENE - a Universal Healer
by Revlgking
07/18/14 10:28 PM
Top Posters (30 Days)
paul 58
Orac 36
Revlgking 23
Bill S. 22
Bill 20
Topic Options
#42580 - 02/14/12 05:55 AM LHC - ramping up the energy
redewenur Offline
Megastar

Registered: 02/14/07
Posts: 1811
http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?sessionId=8&resId=1&materialId=1&confId=164089

That info contains a lot of jargon and mystery for us lay people - luminosity, beam dump, quench, scrubbing, pile up, etc* - but here are a few points of interest:

- LHC is designed for a maximum power of 14TeV, i.e. 7TeV/beam.
- Thus far, it's been using only 3.5TeV/beam, as this was least likely to cause 'risk associated with quenches', and was considered probably sufficient for immediate purposes inc. the search for the Higgs boson.
- It's been decided to increase to 4TeV. With upgrades during the past year, it's calculated that the risk at 4TeV will now be =< the risk at 3.5TeV last year.

"Beam Energy after LS1 (1st September 2014):
Strong recommendation
DO NOT GO FOR 7TeV PER BEAM DUE TO THE RISK ASSOCIATED WITH MANY HUNDREDS (THOUSAND) QUENCHES
Around 6.5TeV/beam is safer and sufficient"

* If anyone can cast some light on the meaning of 'luminosity' (!) and so forth, I'd be glad.
_________________________
Redshift: - the faster you drive toward a green light, the more likely it is to turn red - Murphy

Top
Of Interest?
#42581 - 02/14/12 08:15 AM Re: LHC - ramping up the energy [Re: redewenur]
Orac Offline
Megastar

Registered: 05/20/11
Posts: 2072
Loc: Currently Illinois, USA
LHC luminosity is basically the number of particles in the beam cross section area per unit of time.

http://www.lhc-closer.es/php/index.php?i=1&s=4&p=9&e=0

Essentially the higher the luminosity the more likely you are to get collissions as the two beam meet headon.
_________________________
QM crazy, always wrong, never believe me, sad and broken and now lost credibility and I cry wolf.

Top
#42583 - 02/14/12 10:08 AM Re: LHC - ramping up the energy [Re: redewenur]
redewenur Offline
Megastar

Registered: 02/14/07
Posts: 1811
Thanks for the info and the useful link.
_________________________
Redshift: - the faster you drive toward a green light, the more likely it is to turn red - Murphy

Top
#42586 - 02/14/12 10:53 AM Re: LHC - ramping up the energy [Re: redewenur]
Bill S. Offline
Megastar

Registered: 08/20/10
Posts: 2895
Loc: Essex, UK
That's luminosity sorted, but what about quenches?

Sounds like it might be where the whole thing goes "phutt", or where someone has to throw water over it, but I bet there's a more technical explanation.
_________________________
There never was nothing.

Top



Moderator:  Amaranth Rose II, Kate, Mike Kremer 
Newest Members
robynlodge, verissimofera, GCervantes, Kam_D_Resta, nicha
692 Registered Users
Sponsor
Facebook

We're on Facebook
Join Our Group

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact Us
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2013 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.