Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Search Forums
Custom Search
Who's Online
1 registered (Kate), 198 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
How to perfect set atomic clock ?
by newton
02/09/16 06:41 AM
Zika Virus and Colloidal Silver
by paul
02/08/16 09:46 AM
Why was entropy low in the early Universe?
by Orac
02/07/16 10:58 PM
Has anyone made prednisolone in methyl cellulose?
by Marchimedes
02/07/16 08:31 PM
ΙS LIFE ONLY EVOLVED CHEMISTRY?
by Bill
02/07/16 05:48 PM
WHY WE NOT SEE DOPPLER on MICHELSON MORLEY TABLE
by newton
02/07/16 09:16 AM
Top Posters (30 Days)
Orac 58
paul 56
Marchimedes 40
Bill 27
Bill S. 12
Topic Options
#42580 - 02/14/12 05:55 AM LHC - ramping up the energy
redewenur Offline
Megastar

Registered: 02/14/07
Posts: 1840
http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?sessionId=8&resId=1&materialId=1&confId=164089

That info contains a lot of jargon and mystery for us lay people - luminosity, beam dump, quench, scrubbing, pile up, etc* - but here are a few points of interest:

- LHC is designed for a maximum power of 14TeV, i.e. 7TeV/beam.
- Thus far, it's been using only 3.5TeV/beam, as this was least likely to cause 'risk associated with quenches', and was considered probably sufficient for immediate purposes inc. the search for the Higgs boson.
- It's been decided to increase to 4TeV. With upgrades during the past year, it's calculated that the risk at 4TeV will now be =< the risk at 3.5TeV last year.

"Beam Energy after LS1 (1st September 2014):
Strong recommendation
DO NOT GO FOR 7TeV PER BEAM DUE TO THE RISK ASSOCIATED WITH MANY HUNDREDS (THOUSAND) QUENCHES
Around 6.5TeV/beam is safer and sufficient"

* If anyone can cast some light on the meaning of 'luminosity' (!) and so forth, I'd be glad.
_________________________
"Time is what prevents everything from happening at once" - John Wheeler

Top
Of Interest?
#42581 - 02/14/12 08:15 AM Re: LHC - ramping up the energy [Re: redewenur]
Orac Offline
Megastar

Registered: 05/20/11
Posts: 2613
Loc: Currently Illinois, USA
LHC luminosity is basically the number of particles in the beam cross section area per unit of time.

http://www.lhc-closer.es/php/index.php?i=1&s=4&p=9&e=0

Essentially the higher the luminosity the more likely you are to get collissions as the two beam meet headon.
_________________________
I believe in "Evil, Bad ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.

Top
#42583 - 02/14/12 10:08 AM Re: LHC - ramping up the energy [Re: redewenur]
redewenur Offline
Megastar

Registered: 02/14/07
Posts: 1840
Thanks for the info and the useful link.
_________________________
"Time is what prevents everything from happening at once" - John Wheeler

Top
#42586 - 02/14/12 10:53 AM Re: LHC - ramping up the energy [Re: redewenur]
Bill S. Online   confused
Megastar

Registered: 08/20/10
Posts: 3386
Loc: Essex, UK
That's luminosity sorted, but what about quenches?

Sounds like it might be where the whole thing goes "phutt", or where someone has to throw water over it, but I bet there's a more technical explanation.
_________________________
There never was nothing.

Top



Moderator:  Amaranth Rose II, Kate, Mike Kremer 
Newest Members
checkmate, jessica666, Josh, nooshin, bh691
837 Registered Users
Sponsor
Facebook

We're on Facebook
Join Our Group

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact Us
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.