Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Search Forums
Custom Search
Who's Online
1 registered (1 invisible), 77 Guests and 7 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
vast water reservoir hidden beneath the earth
by paul
Yesterday at 09:36 PM
Experiment with pendulum - FLAT GRAVITATION
by Orac
Yesterday at 09:05 PM
Printed Prosthetic Hand
by Bill S.
Yesterday at 09:32 AM
Three brothers paradox Marosz's explanation
by newton
Yesterday at 01:07 AM
Ultra fast camera & [0/1 ] Michelson Morley
by newton
04/22/14 03:41 PM
Nature, Nurture & Spiriture--Component
s of Life

by Revlgking
04/22/14 03:01 PM
Top Posters (30 Days)
newton 96
Orac 70
paul 68
Bill S. 45
Revlgking 34
Topic Options
#42580 - 02/14/12 05:55 AM LHC - ramping up the energy
redewenur Offline
Megastar

Registered: 02/14/07
Posts: 1784
http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?sessionId=8&resId=1&materialId=1&confId=164089

That info contains a lot of jargon and mystery for us lay people - luminosity, beam dump, quench, scrubbing, pile up, etc* - but here are a few points of interest:

- LHC is designed for a maximum power of 14TeV, i.e. 7TeV/beam.
- Thus far, it's been using only 3.5TeV/beam, as this was least likely to cause 'risk associated with quenches', and was considered probably sufficient for immediate purposes inc. the search for the Higgs boson.
- It's been decided to increase to 4TeV. With upgrades during the past year, it's calculated that the risk at 4TeV will now be =< the risk at 3.5TeV last year.

"Beam Energy after LS1 (1st September 2014):
Strong recommendation
DO NOT GO FOR 7TeV PER BEAM DUE TO THE RISK ASSOCIATED WITH MANY HUNDREDS (THOUSAND) QUENCHES
Around 6.5TeV/beam is safer and sufficient"

* If anyone can cast some light on the meaning of 'luminosity' (!) and so forth, I'd be glad.
_________________________
Redshift: - the faster you drive toward a green light, the more likely it is to turn red - Murphy

Top
Of Interest?
#42581 - 02/14/12 08:15 AM Re: LHC - ramping up the energy [Re: redewenur]
Orac Offline
Megastar

Registered: 05/20/11
Posts: 1921
Loc: Currently Illinois, USA
LHC luminosity is basically the number of particles in the beam cross section area per unit of time.

http://www.lhc-closer.es/php/index.php?i=1&s=4&p=9&e=0

Essentially the higher the luminosity the more likely you are to get collissions as the two beam meet headon.
_________________________
No layman has ever changed science, get a degree before you try and fix or rewrite science please.

Top
#42583 - 02/14/12 10:08 AM Re: LHC - ramping up the energy [Re: redewenur]
redewenur Offline
Megastar

Registered: 02/14/07
Posts: 1784
Thanks for the info and the useful link.
_________________________
Redshift: - the faster you drive toward a green light, the more likely it is to turn red - Murphy

Top
#42586 - 02/14/12 10:53 AM Re: LHC - ramping up the energy [Re: redewenur]
Bill S. Offline
Megastar

Registered: 08/20/10
Posts: 2796
Loc: Essex, UK
That's luminosity sorted, but what about quenches?

Sounds like it might be where the whole thing goes "phutt", or where someone has to throw water over it, but I bet there's a more technical explanation.
_________________________
There never was nothing.

Top



Moderator:  Amaranth Rose II, Kate, Mike Kremer 
Newest Members
Braden, ThothThisThrough, Matthew_Owens, Huynh Phu Dat, pmb
680 Registered Users
Sponsor
Facebook

We're on Facebook
Join Our Group

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact Us
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2013 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.