Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Search Forums
Custom Search
Who's Online
0 registered (), 111 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Symetry or Asymetry ( respect to what ? Orac ... )
by newton
Today at 10:46 AM
Marosz's FIRST ESCAPE SPEED
by newton
Yesterday at 12:25 PM
Time dilation verified
by Bill
Yesterday at 11:48 AM
Cryosphere still warming.
by paul
09/19/14 03:10 PM
FIRST LINEAR MOTION DETECTOR ( CLASSICAL MECHANIC)
by newton
09/17/14 02:32 AM
Mathematics / Physics / Quantum theory and God
by Orac
09/17/14 01:45 AM
Top Posters (30 Days)
newton 62
paul 39
Bill 24
samwik 22
Orac 21
Page 13 of 16 < 1 2 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 >
Topic Options
#37836 - 03/16/11 01:20 PM Re: fake moon landing [Re: Bill S.]
paul Offline
Megastar

Registered: 03/21/06
Posts: 3528
Bill

of course they are communicating backwards in time

you of all people should realize that.

its the quantum space time leverage components associated with the twist of dark matter as the photons are excited during the radio communications.

causing a semi transparent conflicting junction that is not bound by the fabric of space , that in fact this junction tears through the fabric of space thereby tearing time itself lending itself to the increasing velocities of the transmissions.

which results in a backwards movement of time seen only by the radio transmission as it observes the two points of transmission.

the radio transmission itself accelerates faster at point B

than at point A

as the transmission is transmitted
its as if the beginning of the transmission which is further from the earth is overcome by the end of the transmission
because the beginning of the transmission is shrinking as it approaches c.

and before the dinner bell rings the end of the transmission actually passes the beginning of the transmission.

the end of the transmission whirls past the beginning of the transmission which whips the beginning past the end

this process repeats itself until time has driven it backwards.

but you probably already knew that.


_________________________
3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.

Top
Of Interest?
#37841 - 03/16/11 05:28 PM Re: fake moon landing [Re: paul]
kallog Offline
Megastar

Registered: 03/17/10
Posts: 1100
Originally Posted By: paul
its the quantum space time leverage components associated with the twist of dark matter as the photons are excited during the radio communications.


Ah yes, how silly of me to forget that from high school.

Top
#37845 - 03/17/11 07:42 AM Re: fake moon landing [Re: kallog]
Bill S. Offline
Megastar

Registered: 08/20/10
Posts: 2930
Loc: Essex, UK
Originally Posted By: Paul
but you probably already knew that.


Of course! but I could not have expressed it as eloquently. smile
_________________________
There never was nothing.

Top
#37863 - 03/18/11 04:46 PM Re: fake moon landing [Re: Bill S.]
paul Offline
Megastar

Registered: 03/21/06
Posts: 3528
Apollo 17

listen carefully as houston or earth says

remember that piece of tape there

the astronaut replies "yea that came off"

then houston begins to say something and is stepped on

by a repeated "yea that came off"

its the same transmission repeated its not the astronaut repeating his transmission.

_________________________
3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.

Top
#37865 - 03/18/11 08:14 PM Re: fake moon landing [Re: paul]
Max Offline
Member

Registered: 02/18/07
Posts: 91
WOW! Good find, Paul. There's something about that second "yea that came off", I can't put my finger on it. Almost as if it came from an alternate reality or something. shocked

Top
#37867 - 03/18/11 09:43 PM Re: fake moon landing [Re: Max]
kallog Offline
Megastar

Registered: 03/17/10
Posts: 1100
Sounds just like what I hear on the phone when I call the other side of the world. My own voice coming back faint and unclear occasionally.

Still, it's kind of pointless trying to make anything of these videos because we don't know how they were edited. You can't see anyone's mouth moving so there's no need for the sound to be synchronized with the picture - they're free to cut out audio pauses whenever they want for viewer convenience.

Top
#37924 - 03/23/11 07:25 PM Re: fake moon landing [Re: kallog]
Max Offline
Member

Registered: 02/18/07
Posts: 91
We need to pay attention. The moon phase chart I posted was for BC dates. I missed it, you missed it, we all missed it...Or has it been changed.

Hmmm

Top
#37931 - 03/24/11 02:59 AM Re: fake moon landing [Re: Max]
kallog Offline
Megastar

Registered: 03/17/10
Posts: 1100
HAHAHA! Indeed it is! Oops :P

Top
#37937 - 03/24/11 04:22 PM Re: fake moon landing [Re: kallog]
Max Offline
Member

Registered: 02/18/07
Posts: 91
No one picked #2: There was a full moon on Nov 19, 1969. lol! So much for my childhood memory. I guess it was just an "almost" full moon. shocked That's what struck my curiosity...When I read that we have never landed on a full moon, my childhood memory said, "Hey, wait a minute here..."

http://www.briancasey.org/artifacts/astro/moon.cgi

Check Nov 19 1969. It looks full to me. smile

Top
#37940 - 03/25/11 05:50 AM Re: fake moon landing [Re: Max]
kallog Offline
Megastar

Registered: 03/17/10
Posts: 1100
Yea haha what a cock-up. It's good how clearly you posed the problem, but dumb of us to ignore that other option!

Originally Posted By: Max

http://www.briancasey.org/artifacts/astro/moon.cgi

Check Nov 19 1969. It looks full to me. smile


Kind of close. 80-90% full. I guess we have to convert that to position relative to the magnetotail.

Top
#37941 - 03/25/11 02:02 PM Re: fake moon landing [Re: Max]
paul Offline
Megastar

Registered: 03/21/06
Posts: 3528
I remember it well , it was a full moon and I remember that
I had a cardboard lunar lander that I got from some fast food place attached to a string on a broomstick.

I was on my front porch leaning over the banisters and landing the lunar lander in the yard.

the moon was full.

but then again the north star was also very bright and it was in the northern sky.

and now its gone.
_________________________
3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.

Top
#37944 - 03/25/11 08:48 PM Re: fake moon landing [Re: paul]
kallog Offline
Megastar

Registered: 03/17/10
Posts: 1100
OK here's a bunch of rough calculations that show the Moon wasn't in the plasma sheet while the Apollo Nov astronauts were there. Doesn't say anything about the magnetotail in general which is all vague and big.


Data:
Thickness of plasma sheet: 6 Earth diameters
Distance to moon: 30 earth diameters
Date of landing: Nov 19 1969
Date of leaving: Nov 21 1969
Date of full moon: Nov 23 1969
Period between full moons: 30 days

The angle between the moon and the line straight away from the Sun is 0 degrees on Nov 23
It's about 20 degrees on Nov 21 (23-21)/30 * 360deg
It's about 50 degrees on Nov 19 (23-19)/30 * 360deg

The angle between the edge of the plasma sheet at the moon's orbit, and the line straight away from the Sun is arctan(3/30) = 6 degrees.

So, the sequence of events would be:
Land on moon at 50 degrees
Leave moon at 20 degrees
Plasma sheet hits at 6 degrees
Full moon at 0 degrees
Therefore the astronauts weren't on the surface inside the plasma sheet.

Top
#38439 - 05/15/11 04:22 PM Re: fake moon landing [Re: kallog]
Bill S. Offline
Megastar

Registered: 08/20/10
Posts: 2930
Loc: Essex, UK
This has nothing to do with moon landings, fake or otherwise. I post it simply so that others may draw any parallels they see fit.

It is taken from an article in the “Sun” newspaper of 27. Aug. 1967. The article includes a picture, to which reference is made, but the only copy I have is too poor to reproduce.

“I must say this for the flat-Earthers: they don’t scare easily. You might have thought that the latest pictures of a satellite’s-eye view of the Earth, taken from 214,000 miles up, would have shaken them. Not at all.

Mr Samuel Shenton, Secretary and guiding light of the Flat Earth Society, had the answer. Mr Shenton always has the answer: Faked.

‘You see those lines running across the photograph, especially at the bottom? That shows it’s a composite. Mocked up, probably, from a static model’.”

Does nothing ever change? smile
_________________________
There never was nothing.

Top
#38446 - 05/16/11 01:46 PM Re: fake moon landing [Re: Bill S.]
paul Offline
Megastar

Registered: 03/21/06
Posts: 3528
Using a fish eyed lense even a flat earth would appear to be a sphere.

to be blunt about it , as soon as the flat earthers produce any location where I can travel to and look off the edge of the earth , that is when I will begin to believe the earth is flat or that Im hallucinating.

_________________________
3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.

Top
#39253 - 07/31/11 11:55 PM Re: fake moon landing [Re: paul]
preearth Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 05/22/10
Posts: 370
The moon landing was faked. There are (essentially) no stars in the moon landing photos.
_________________________
Earth formed from a collision
www.preearth.net

Plate-tectonics is wrong
www.preearth.net/plate.html

Top
#39261 - 08/01/11 05:25 AM Re: fake moon landing [Re: preearth]
Bill S. Offline
Megastar

Registered: 08/20/10
Posts: 2930
Loc: Essex, UK
There may, or may not, be a lot of reasons to suspect that the moon photos were faked (or doctored), but should we confuse the photos with the event?
_________________________
There never was nothing.

Top
#39332 - 08/06/11 03:55 PM Re: fake moon landing [Re: preearth]
paul Offline
Megastar

Registered: 03/21/06
Posts: 3528
it was a 6.25 watt video camera.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_TV_camera

_________________________
3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.

Top
#39354 - 08/07/11 05:20 PM Re: fake moon landing [Re: paul]
Bill S. Offline
Megastar

Registered: 08/20/10
Posts: 2930
Loc: Essex, UK
The nature of the cameras used is not really relevant to the fact that even if one could provide evidence that pictures were doctored, or even faked, that would not necessarily prove that the landing didn't take place.

I have just been writing up notes of a geological field trip in which the group leader used some very damaged specimens to demonsrtate how to distinguish between three different fossil genera. The photos I have used in my notes are of fossils from from my own collection as they are better specimens than we had in the field. You might say that my pictures are faked, you would be right, but that would not be proof that I did not visit Chillesford Church Pit on the date in question.
_________________________
There never was nothing.

Top
#39358 - 08/07/11 07:46 PM Re: fake moon landing [Re: Bill S.]
paul Offline
Megastar

Registered: 03/21/06
Posts: 3528
preearth had commented on the lack of visible stars in the moon landing photos.

I was commenting on the camera that took the photos.

the camera must not have been capable of capturing the dim light of the stars.

but heres one that shows the earth and stars

_________________________
3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.

Top
#39377 - 08/08/11 10:05 AM Re: fake moon landing [Re: paul]
TheFallibleFiend Offline
Megastar

Registered: 06/08/05
Posts: 1940
Loc: http://thefalliblefiend.blogsp...

Top
Page 13 of 16 < 1 2 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 >



Moderator:  Amaranth Rose II, Kate, Mike Kremer 
Newest Members
Gareth, hussen, charliechucks7, tom, albert
700 Registered Users
Sponsor
Facebook

We're on Facebook
Join Our Group

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact Us
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2013 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.