How do you see the unity of all Physical Laws ?

I ask this question because between Real Laws

( Newton's , Maxwell's, Einstein's, Lorentz's,

Schrödinger's, Dirac's . . . .etc.) there are many 'black holes'

and ' white spots' ( time, dark energy, dark mass, graviton,

quark, Higgs boson, . . . and 1000 another elementary particles.)

Comments.

1.

Unity? That's news. But physics keeps striving to reduce the number

of equations necessary to describe everything -- so called unification.

It began when Newton unified gravity on earth with gravity in space.

1 equation.

Unification continued when Maxwell reduced all the experiments

on electricity and magnetism to just 4 equations.

It continued with Einstein's special relativity, which amounts

to the Lorentz transformation. 4 equations. You might say

it unifies space and time. General relativity unifies gravitational

mass with inertial mass.

Then equations of motion for atoms were described by quantum

mechanics -- such as Schroedinger Equation & later Dirac Equation.

These form the common unification of chemistry.

Then quantum electrodynamics was discovered, which unified

electromagnetism with the quantum theory. Some of theory's

predictions (such as the fine structure constant) have been

experimentally verified to something like 10 or 12 decimal places,

a huge measure of success for any physical theory.

Meanwhile the strong & weak nuclear forces were partly

de-mystified: The weak force was found to be unified with

electromagnetism (electro-weak force), while the strong nuclear

force involves quarks of various kinds, with specific rules of

interaction best described by group theory.

And so it goes. The 'holy grail' of physics is to reduce all

of existence (all interactions of all particles) into a single equation,

sometimes called "God's Equation" -- the ultimate unification.

" Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler."

/ --Albert Einstein /

/ by xprofessor /

2.

i think there is unity in most laws but not all, after quantum physics

basically there is no real law, we think of time, gravity and matter

in certain ways but in reality they are random forces with mostly

predictable outcomes but not 100 %, then there is parallel

universes and things as such where physical laws go the

wayside , just like black holes. , so in reality , not much unity.

/ by newyorkguy /

3.

Their is the laws of the microverse and laws for the macroverse

(verse = universe) I wonder if they apply 100% at their own

extents and reduce (perhaps exponentially) as they come closer

toward the other one meshing in the in the middle. thus the

macrocosm still deals with quantum physics at

say .000000000000000000 00000000000 1% near the size

of say our solar system where "normal" laws of say gravity

exist at 99.9999999999999999 999999999% and vice versa

at say the size of an atom it is the other way...?????

?? hhmmmmmmmm?? ?? just perhaps.

/ by guardian /

4.

I want it to be simple and not too magical.

/ by SuperA /

5.

Yours is a very profound question. I can tell from your question that

you are ready to be let in on the "Dirty Little Secret" of Theoretical Physics:

We have NOT yet figured everything out. The universe is governed by whole

sets of "Laws" that do NOT agree and are mutually exclusive.

This is a great embarrassment. We assume we live in an orderly, rational

universe that makes sense. Perhaps when Quantum Mechanics and

General Relativity are unified we will have a better answer to your question.

A paraphrase from NOVA - Elegant Universe with Graham Greene

http://www.pbs. org/wgbh/ nova/elegant/ pro…

/ by OldPilot /

6.

The LAWS must unify, or we are describing things that don't actually exist.

/ Allen Francom /.

============ ==== . .

P.S.

I think that now our Physics looks like the Augean stables.

And if we want to clean them we must start from

understanding not new but the old abstract models:

ideal gas, ideal black body, entropy, electrical harmonic

oscillators, point -particle . . . etc.

====== . .

Best wishes.

Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.