|
|
|
Physics Forum
|
|
=== . P.S. http://wbabin.net/physics/sadovnik.pdf =========== .
|
|
Physics Forum
|
|
Spin of Quantum Particle and Gravity Mass. (? !) It is possible to say : that Physicists agree that the state of spin exists - but they don’t know what the cause of spin is. === . Questions. 1. Where does the ZERO-SPIN come from ? Where does the A
|
|
Climate Change Forum
|
|
Very concise how you wrote this. I have a nuclear power plant that I see off in the distance that I see driving by. It's shut down now because of problems during operation. A lot of the people are releived. Nuclear energy makes me nervous. Som
|
|
Physics Forum
|
|
Do you believe in Physics ? You don’t have to be so sure. Why ? === . How does Physics look now? # The basis of the Physics consists of: 1. Abstract ‘ inertial movement’. 2. Abstract ‘ideal gas and ideal particles.’ 3. Abstract ‘absolute black bo
|
|
Not-Quite-Science Forum
|
|
Well, then, Zeph, we've determined that you're about as interested in my posts as I am in any of the stupid crap that you have generated. Also, *you* don't determine what's welcomed *here*. http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CH/CH503.html
|
|
Not-Quite-Science Forum
|
|
Originally Posted By: TheFallibleFiendNoah's Ark found!I'm not interested about these findings very much - but can you refute his finding in scientific way? If yes, your opinion is greatly welcommed here. If not, why don't you simply shut up? It's
|
|
Not-Quite-Science Forum
|
|
Sin == error of highest intent or "to miss the mark".
|
|
Not-Quite-Science Forum
|
|
Socratus, There is a difference between "paradox" and "acceptance of axioms". But irrespective of that difference they both indicate the limits of traditional logic. By raising biological considerations I have offered a possible
|
|
Not-Quite-Science Forum
|
|
Originally Posted By: eccles Scientists like Feynman refused to be drawn on the ontological implications of their models, such as his own "negative time" vectors. He called philosophers "tourists" who mused on the pragmatic work
|
|
Not-Quite-Science Forum
|
|
Originally Posted By: ecclesSurely, what generates the term "paradoxical" is the inclusion of the observer in quantum events. This immediately deconstructs "objectivity" and consequently notions of an "external reality"
|
|
Not-Quite-Science Forum
|
|
Surely, what generates the term "paradoxical" is the inclusion of the observer in quantum events. This immediately deconstructs "objectivity" and consequently notions of an "external reality" (re Planck's problem with &q
|
|
Not-Quite-Science Forum
|
|
The "wedge document" was authored by the Discovery Institute. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wedge_strategy Purpose is to overthrow materialism in science, i.e. methodological materialism (as opposed to philosophical materialism). What d
|
|
General Science Discussion Forum
|
|
There is a less important notion here - in addition to corrupting the process of communication, these people are essentially wasting people's time. It's analogous to those sleazy companies that pay people minimum wage to call your house and disturb
|
|
Not-Quite-Science Forum
|
|
Originally Posted By: ecclesNB A major contributor is John Polkinghorne, particle physicist turned theologian. Critics abound (see Google). I am sorry I have disturbed you, but I needed time to answer you. == . In 1900 Planck to admit the existenc
|
|
General Science Discussion Forum
|
|
Hey All, Check this link..... http://www.wikio.com/article/measurement-exhaled-nitric-oxide-exhaled-disorders-141883906
|
|
Not-Quite-Science Forum
|
|
Anti-knowledge: http://www.wyattmuseum.com/noahs-ark-04.htm Noah's Ark found! By the same guy who has found the ark of the convenant! wow!
|
|
Not-Quite-Science Forum
|
|
Selective replies pasted from other forums are extremely irritating ! Have the curtesy to reply to participants on this one even if you disagree.
|
|
Not-Quite-Science Forum
|
|
Originally Posted By: socratus # So, maybe, Aristotle was right separating the knowledge of Nature on two parts: Physics and Metaphysics. ==== . S. ============================== Comment by Dr. Kanda . Hello Mr. Israel, Correct. Vatican was cor
|
|
Not-Quite-Science Forum
|
|
Socratus, Why are you quoting Polkinghorne's one-liner on QT ? For his phrase "eventual settlement" read "ultimate truth" and you are back into the psychology of security (closing off the void). Of course a dualist/realist would
|
|
General Science Discussion Forum
|
|
"Tweak Gravity: What If There Is No Dark Matter?" http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=dark-matter-modified-gravity The title is a little misleading. Galaxies don't have enough known mass to account for their behavior, so we
|
|
General Science Discussion Forum
|
|
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=electrification-coalition These guys are trying to solve the problem of slow spread of electric vehicles and the infrastructure to support them.
|
|
Not-Quite-Science Forum
|
|
‘ QT . . . ,we do not understand the theory as fully as we should. We shall see in what follows that important interpretative issues remain unresolved. They will demand for their eventual settlement not only physical insight but also metaphysical
|
|
Not-Quite-Science Forum
|
|
Originally Posted By: EllisIt seems to me, that if someone goes looking for sin it's probable that it will be found. Whilst there are some obvious, universally accepted sins, (eg mistreatment of children), sometimes a sin can be culturally specific.
|
|
Not-Quite-Science Forum
|
|
Anti-knowledge: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=up5jmbSjWkw&feature=PlayList&p=1DCF7497D9A88746&index=0 Amazing thing about this is that soon after it was first posted to the net, there were LOTS of "expert" videographers who
|
|
Not-Quite-Science Forum
|
|
It seems to me, that if someone goes looking for sin it's probable that it will be found. Whilst there are some obvious, universally accepted sins, (eg mistreatment of children), sometimes a sin can be culturally specific.
|
