I said I would try to get a scientific question in before discharge, so here goes.

Sean Carroll says: "The microscopic laws of physics draw no distinction between past and future". He uses this to justify pages of argument in support of the need for a Past Hypothesis in order to make sense of the present.

Surely, this basic assumption is flawed. Reactions of kaons, B particles and some atomic reactions show clear time asymmetry.

Have i missed something?

energy in univers is going and going (it is RIVER EM PRESSURE )





are we able walk in to RIVER and feel the same water on LEGS ?




each electron is walking inside river !

??electron is registering the same water ( sorry the same EM pressure ) ?

Each second Earth is accelerating and accelerating

SUN---------------Earth

SUN is pushing Earth
it is very low force we can not see acceleration during 1 year ?
10000 years ???


Not exist the same condition for experiment
(old Hypothesis (past) are able become confirmed by the same experiment
inside other new WATER IN RIVER )

time is going = conditions for this what we observing are not the same !

Gravitation ?

1kg ball and 1kg sheet ( 100 m^2 )
what will go more faster ?







Einstein described gravitation ???
In Ligo WE SAW GRAVITATION ???

what is it gravitation ?

Thanks Maroz. Just what I needed, some pictures to take my mind off the fact that they didn't discharge me yesterday!

Past Hypothesis is able become actual hypothesis

and

actual hypothesis is able become Past Hypothesis


?????

Experiment in physics = TRUE

on Drawings I showed You "River" EM pressure is changing and changing ...

THE SAME EXPERIMENT WITH LIGHT (NOW )
IS ABLE GIVE NOT THE SAME the result of the experiment in future !

condition for experiment are never the same Past Hypothesis is able become actual hypothesis because experimet will confirm past hypthesis !

The Michelson–Morley experiment was performed over the spring and summer of 1887 by Albert A. Michelson and Edward W. Morley at what is now Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, and published in November of the same year.[1] It compared the speed of light in perpendicular directions, in an attempt to detect the relative motion of matter through the stationary luminiferous aether ("aether wind"). The result was negative, in that the expected difference between the speed of light in the direction of movement through the presumed aether, and the speed at right angles, was found not to exist; this result is generally considered to be the first strong evidence against the then-prevalent aether theory, and initiated a line of research that eventually led to special relativity, which rules out a stationary aether.[A 1] The experiment has been referred to as "the moving-off point for the theoretical aspects of the Second Scientific Revolution".[A 2]

Michelson–Morley type experiments have been repeated many times with steadily increasing sensitivity. These include experiments from 1902 to 1905, and a series of experiments in the 1920s. More recent optical resonator experiments confirmed the absence of any aether wind at the 10−17 level.[2][3] Together with the Ives–Stilwell and Kennedy–Thorndike experiments, Michelson–Morley type experiments form one of the fundamental tests of special relativity theory.[A 3]


MAROSZ ? how big force is pushing mirrors ???



HOW FAST IS MOVING SOURCE/ SENSOR
( Vx speed and Vy speed is the same ??? or not )

intresting IDEA


"Life is making circle "

claud ---->Rain ----HOT+water---->claud



HUBBLE found nice problem RED shift

WE -------galactics >>> escape


MAROSZ RED SHIFT ???
Hubble didn't find evidence that universe is expanding
exist other explanation for RED SHIFT without expading model

1) Each body in universe is making rotation
evidence On Ball work not constant EM pressure
(Iverse Square Law is teeling me that "Down side of the ball" is registering higher pressure



>link to full screen pic.

Em pressure is in each point in space
Density is not isotropy
very important is Inverse Square Law

>link to full screen pic.


Einstein told everything is moving
Marosz everything is making rotation

Marosz VS Hubble !

X...R1.....WE -----RadiusR2------Galactics
...........^........................^
...........^V1......................^ Vx speed
...........^........................^

X - Far Far point in space


RED SHIFT ? Galactica = Source WE = sensor
Exist GLOBAL OMEGA

V1/R1 = Vx/(R1+R2 )


DO WE NEED OLD Hypothesis ?

Marosz in my opinion Life is making circle
TRUE also is making circle

EXIST VERY VERY SPECYFIC PERIOD ( XXX years )
I'm doing experiment NOW after XXX years the same experiment
will give ideal the same resoult

I'm doing experiment BEFORE XXX years the same experiment is not giving the same resoult

I MUST WAIT XXX years to have teha same condition for the same expeiment ( EM river is able make circe)

Peiodicaly OLD hypothesis is able be confirmed
Peiodicaly ! old hypothesic become actual and actual become wrong