EM drive made of plasticyne !

Posted by: newton

EM drive made of plasticyne ! - 07/19/16 07:44 AM

1861 J. C. Maxwell, published his theory of electromagnetic fields and radiation,which shows that light has momentum and thus can exert pressure on objects.

2011 Grover Swartzlander first began to examine a revolutionary concept in optical physics after studying the flight of a moth. He watched the animal use its wings to create lift..... ( find more in google)

2012 Marosz (me )

HOW BIG TENSION is registering CAR ???

below my first experiment

photon > C ..............camrea >>>30km/s

photon > C .....30km/s<<<camera


first pictures's histogram
3 pictures camera------bulb >>> 30km/s
3 pictures bulb------camera >>> 30km/s

Posted by: newton

Re: EM drive made of plasticyne ! - 07/19/16 07:48 AM

I looking people who will repeat my test in international team and we must public resoults in PHYSICS JOURNAL

Distance D = constant ! SUN's power = constant !

L1 , L2 L3 ???

EXIST EM comunication CENTER ----electron !!!


Galilean relativity ?*********************************************************
Imagine a person inside a ship which is sailing on a perfectly smooth lake at constant speed. This passeneger is in the ship's windowless hull and, despite it being a fine day, is engaged in doing mechanical experiments (such as studying the behavior of pendula and the trajectories of falling bodies). A simple question one can ask of this researcher is whether she can determine that the ship is moving (with respect to the lake shore) without going on deck or looking out a porthole.
Since the ship is moving at constant speed and direction she will not feel the motion of the ship. This is the same situation as when flying on a plane: one cannot tell, without looking out one of the windows, that the plane is moving once it reaches cruising altitutde (at which point the plane is flying at constant speed and direction). Still one might wonder whether the experiments being done in the ship's hull will give some indication of the its motion. Based on his experiments Galileo concluded that this is in fact impossible: all mechanical experiments done inside a ship moving at constant speed in a constant direction would give precisely the same results as similar experiments done on shore.
The conclusion is that one observer in a house by the shore and another in the ship will not be able to determine that the ship is moving by comparing the results of experiments done inside the house and ship. In order to determine motion these observers must look at each other. It is important important to note that this is true only if the ship is sailing at constant speed and direction, should it speed up, slow down or turn the researcher inside can tell that the ship is moving. For example, if the ship turns you can see all things hanging from the roof (such as a lamp) tilting with respect to the floor
Generalizing these observations Galileo postulated his relativity hypothesis:
any two observers moving at constant speed and direction with respect to one another will obtain the same results for all mechanical experiments
(it is understood that the apparatuses they use for these experiments move with them).
In pursuing these ideas Galileo used the scientific method (Sec. 1.2.1): he derived consequences of this hypothesis and determined whether they agree with the predictions.
This idea has a very important consequence: velocity is not absolute. This means that velocity can only be measured in reference to some object(s), and that the result of this measurment changes if we decide to measure the velocity with respect to a diferent refernce point(s). Imagine an observer traveling inside a windowless spaceship moving away from the sun at constant velocity. Galileo asserted that there are no mechanical experiments that can be made inside the rocket that will tell the occupants that the rocket is moving . The question ``are we moving'' has no meaning unless we specify a reference frame (``are we moving with respect to that star'' is meaningful). This fact, formulated in the 1600's remains very true today and is one of the cornerstones of Einstein's theories of relativity. MAROSZ(me) we are mowing respect to own OLD position this fact we can easy mesure ! Dynamica it is absolute frame below I showing rocket without windows and person inside !
Situation A : I turned ON Em Source and nothing happen
Situation B /C : I turned ON Em Source and I started slowing down !

Posted by: Amaranth Rose II

Re: EM drive made of plasticyne ! - 08/17/16 05:50 AM

Newton, you are making yourself a nuisance again. Stick to one thread per question and try to limit yourself to no more than three threads. You are flooding the forum and I'm going to have to ban you if it keeps up.

Amaranth Rose II
Posted by: newton

Re: EM drive made of plasticyne ! - 08/26/16 02:01 PM

Posted by: paul

Re: EM drive made of plasticyne ! - 08/26/16 04:17 PM

why use a light absorbing black color inside the box , use a reflective coating of gold.

this way all of the light from the EM source will be directed
through the plastic end of the box.

light has mass so there basically is no difference between this setup and a ( modern ... vomitting puke) slow ass rocket engine.
Posted by: newton

Re: EM drive made of plasticyne ! - 08/29/16 11:51 AM

why use a light absorbing black color inside the box , use a reflective coating of gold.

mirror <<< C

mirror is registering FORCE ( P=mv )

plasticyne <<< C

plascticyne is changing energy to hot and also giving reflection
and also registering (P=mv )

30 km/s You can see on drawing ???????????

Please imagine that EARTH = PLASTICYNE
how big force is pushing Earth ?
Posted by: paul

Re: EM drive made of plasticyne ! - 08/29/16 01:41 PM

you didnt have a mirror in the box.

you just had a box with a black interior.
and plasticine at one end.

a mirror would slow down the light slightly as it travels
through the glass medium to the reflective coating and then
out of the mirror.

gold would not absorb the light like the mirror would
it would only reflect it.

using gold would reduce the p=mv to the inside of the box.

and more of the energy of the EM source would be converted
into heat by the plasticine because less light is being absorbed
by the other 5 sides of the box.

you would have a reactionless propulsion device using tiny
amounts of gold leaf and some modeling clay and a box.

but it has no value until you can prove it.

and the people that you would need to prove it to are paid
to not believe it.

so why bother with it.

just buy more gasoline for your spaceship.
Posted by: newton

Re: EM drive made of plasticyne ! - 09/02/16 11:38 AM

sorry for my english below I will use more simple explanation

We have 100% dark box and two the same walls (plasticyne )

plasticyne----L----bulb----L-------plasticyne >>>V

EM wave is not moving with the bulb !
Bulb is moving V speed respect to "OWN OLD POSITION"

How big force is pushing LEFT/RIGHT wall ( Plasticyne A mm^2 area)


We have three options
A- train is not moving
B,C train is moving !

HOW BIG FORCE IS PUSHING CAMERA ??! ( camera is INSIDE ! airplane !!)