A Hypothesis on Gravity - 01/02/14 02:52 PM
Here are my thoughts on gravity.
Let us take a tesseract sphere that has two points that are polar opposites equal distance apart. If we were to draw straight, equal length lines connecting the two points in the tesseract or hyper space, then distort that image into a three dimensional image, it should look like how we see magnets with poles work.
With this concept of electromagnitism, let us now picture a dipole of two positive points with two negative points squeezed in the middle. We'll draw two parallel lines through the two negative points in hyper space, then draw connecting lines to the upper two and lower two opposing points. When we 'fan' it out and view it from three dimensional space, it should look like what we observe with a dipole magnet and its field lines.
Now let us apply this to gravity. We'll take a dipole gravity and place it in the middle of a massive object, say a star, or a black hole. Positive gravity would appear very strong near the object, but there would be a very thin, weak, stretched out anti gravity 'disk' (as seen from our limited three dimensional view point) where matter would not so readily fall into our massive object. Hence why galaxies have disks of dust and stars, and stars have disks of dust to form planets from.
Let us then collide two very large gravity wells together and say it pinches the two positive gravity poles together, seemingly squeezing the gap between them shut. Now the anti gravity poles seem to jump to infinity. In reality, it's just at the opposite side of our tesseract sphere. If we could see along the curvature of space, the opposite pole would appear to surround us in all points in space, like being in the interior of a giant Dyson sphere, just as if you were able to observe a pole at the south pole along the curvature of the earth from the north pole, it would look like an endless wall that surrounds you. Anyway, with a single pole gravity well, there would be no anti-gravity well (near us from our three dimensional perspective) to 'suspend' matter away from our massive object, and you get something that looks like a globular cluster, spherical and no gas as it has all fallen into our positive gravity well.
I argue that this 'disk' of anti-gravity in our dipole gravity well helps keep gas and dust from falling into our massive object. And also, once these hyper spheres of gravity are far enough apart as in no longer overlapping each other's positive fields, then the anti-fields begin to take over and begins to push matter away instead of attract it. I also argue that of course, gravity has more affect on matter than it does on itself.
This anti-gravity disk would of course appear nigh imperceptible to us, as it is stretched very thin as far as our perspective in three dimensional space is concerned from near large gravity wells.
This of course means that all baryonic matter has its own hyper sphere of influence.
For me, this seems to explain why solar systems, galaxies, globular cluster and other structures of matter behave as they do. Even why when stars go supernova, they take on an hour glass like shape. It would also seem to explain why gravity is strong when matter is close together, but becomes repulsed after a distance threshold is reached, hence the appearance of dark energy. It may also explain the phantom like dark matter that seems to haunt matter.
I guess the next question would be, does anti-gravity affect anti-matter the way gravity affects matter, hence the seeming lack of anti-matter in our pole of the universe?
Anyway, there you go, my hypothesis of gravelectromagnetism.
Let us take a tesseract sphere that has two points that are polar opposites equal distance apart. If we were to draw straight, equal length lines connecting the two points in the tesseract or hyper space, then distort that image into a three dimensional image, it should look like how we see magnets with poles work.
With this concept of electromagnitism, let us now picture a dipole of two positive points with two negative points squeezed in the middle. We'll draw two parallel lines through the two negative points in hyper space, then draw connecting lines to the upper two and lower two opposing points. When we 'fan' it out and view it from three dimensional space, it should look like what we observe with a dipole magnet and its field lines.
Now let us apply this to gravity. We'll take a dipole gravity and place it in the middle of a massive object, say a star, or a black hole. Positive gravity would appear very strong near the object, but there would be a very thin, weak, stretched out anti gravity 'disk' (as seen from our limited three dimensional view point) where matter would not so readily fall into our massive object. Hence why galaxies have disks of dust and stars, and stars have disks of dust to form planets from.
Let us then collide two very large gravity wells together and say it pinches the two positive gravity poles together, seemingly squeezing the gap between them shut. Now the anti gravity poles seem to jump to infinity. In reality, it's just at the opposite side of our tesseract sphere. If we could see along the curvature of space, the opposite pole would appear to surround us in all points in space, like being in the interior of a giant Dyson sphere, just as if you were able to observe a pole at the south pole along the curvature of the earth from the north pole, it would look like an endless wall that surrounds you. Anyway, with a single pole gravity well, there would be no anti-gravity well (near us from our three dimensional perspective) to 'suspend' matter away from our massive object, and you get something that looks like a globular cluster, spherical and no gas as it has all fallen into our positive gravity well.
I argue that this 'disk' of anti-gravity in our dipole gravity well helps keep gas and dust from falling into our massive object. And also, once these hyper spheres of gravity are far enough apart as in no longer overlapping each other's positive fields, then the anti-fields begin to take over and begins to push matter away instead of attract it. I also argue that of course, gravity has more affect on matter than it does on itself.
This anti-gravity disk would of course appear nigh imperceptible to us, as it is stretched very thin as far as our perspective in three dimensional space is concerned from near large gravity wells.
This of course means that all baryonic matter has its own hyper sphere of influence.
For me, this seems to explain why solar systems, galaxies, globular cluster and other structures of matter behave as they do. Even why when stars go supernova, they take on an hour glass like shape. It would also seem to explain why gravity is strong when matter is close together, but becomes repulsed after a distance threshold is reached, hence the appearance of dark energy. It may also explain the phantom like dark matter that seems to haunt matter.
I guess the next question would be, does anti-gravity affect anti-matter the way gravity affects matter, hence the seeming lack of anti-matter in our pole of the universe?
Anyway, there you go, my hypothesis of gravelectromagnetism.