What is the nature of h-bar ?

In my peasant opinion the " photon" is a particle ( h ),
or a " noun.", who can act as a " verb."
It means photon ( as a " noun." ) can produce wave length
acting ( as a " verb." ), according to formula E =h*f,
where h* is corpuscular, who has spin h/2pi.
The spin h/2pi means the particle rotates around its axis.

Now I can clearly understand and read the formula E =h*f :
The particle ( h ) rotate around of its axis ( h* = 2pi )
is action of frequency (f) which make up energy (E ).

As result of this action is possible to detect electrical
wave length in surroundings .
== .
Israel Sadovnik. Socratus.
==== .
http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Scientists&tab1=Display&id=1372
===================== . .

Comment by Vern:

I think you stated the answer to your question.
h bar is h divided by 2 PI.
2 PI is the amount of radians it takes to make a circle.
So h bar injects the circle into the argument.
Since the circle is usually in the argument, it is just a short cut.
/ Vern /
===

1.
h is Quantum of action.
2.
h exists because ‘ angular momentum ‘ is quantized..
h is not a particle, either.
3.
h is (h) just a constant of nature.
h has no spin, h is just a constant
( h) isn't the particle. Just one of many characteristics it has.
4.
h-bar is the Maltese representation of the Arabic letter ha.
They also have nouns and verbs in Maltese, but theirs actually make
sense to speakers of at least one more language than you do.
5.
. . . .
the inappropriate units of measurement in which
h-bar is too often expressed, most often
Joule-seconds or Newton-meters.
6.
Planck's " h" is a quantity of action. Despite the ambiguity
beloved by present physicists, a quantity is not a particle.
7
Please excuse me for saying so, dear peasant, but you've
been sadly misled by your professors. The quantity h is
not a particle, and it doesn't rotate on its axis
/ glird /
7
Now you are almost completely illicit.
You certainly haven't got a clue what you are talking about.
/ Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA /
==== .
#
There are many opinions about ( h).
And we can see that (h ) as ‘ something’ has
many characteristics.
Question.
To whom do the characteristics belong :
to wave, to Micky Mouse, to Superman . . . . ?

It is hard to me to understand those people who observe
and see only one parameter of some object/ subject.
It reminds me the old story about three blind Indian men
who studied an elephant. One touched the elephant’s leg
an said it was a column, another one touching a stomach
told it was a ball, and the last holding the tail said it was
a snake. I think the Plank's constant (h ) is a ‘ modern
scientific elephant ‘ and many experts try to study it
using the ‘ blind method.’
=== .