A hacker sends not normal and illegal signals from satellites.

People over the whole world blink with their eyes more then normal. You can study this on TV (Bloomberg, BBC, CNN or other TV-channels). It is very easy to see.

Maybe it is less visible, but men have less soft movements then normal.
This is also because of illegal and dangerous signals from satellites into the brains of human beings.

It is very easy to see the increased eye blinking on people on television.

Also the less soft movements on people (especially men) are very easy to observe and register.
If you want to, or have to, you can compare

old record/tapes of television or films
vs.
todays television and new films.

DA, have fun with this one.
Sincerely,

why is this the norm on this board, rather than an exception?

It is dangerous to let a private person control a satellite.

cansouth, get back on you antipsychotic medication and call your doctor in the morning, please.

http://www.xatrix.org/article.php?s=1993

CANSOUTH:

"People over the whole world blink with their eyes more then normal. You can study this on TV (Bloomberg, BBC, CNN or other TV-channels). It is very easy to see."

The hacking part makes sense-but!

Are you suggesting that a hacker has dubbed a satellite in some way that causes transmissions of TV signals to effect only peoples eyes so they appear to blink more often? Think about it.
How far out can paranoia get? Possibly I did not understand your offering.
jw

"Are you suggesting that a hacker has dubbed a satellite in some way that causes transmissions of TV signals to effect only peoples eyes so they appear to blink more often?"

No.
All people in the area the satellites send signals, blink more and behave more staccato.

It has nothing to do with tv. But it is easy to see it on tv.

Maybe you should be more open minded.

It is very easy to see the blinking increase on CNN, BBC, Bloomberg and TV5 Europe.

"A hacker sends not normal and illegal signals from satellites"
Have you any real evidence of this?

"But it is easy to see it on tv."
It is easy to see on TV, because people in television studios are in front of intensely bright lights. You don't see it from your angle.

I am occasionally afflicted by temporary blindness - not complete blindness, but an extreme blurring lasting about 10 to 30 minutes. My eye doctor said this is common to many programmers. We tend to stare at a screen for hours and we forget to blink, which causes our eyes to dry out. His prescription: keep visine handy, look up every 15 minutes or so, keep the window open and look around office and off into the distance.

Having a long attention span is a good thing, but these 4 hour sessions need to be tempered with a bit of eye maintenance.

"This is also because of illegal and dangerous signals from satellites into the brains of human beings. "

You haven't provided any evidence of this. Even if your observation were correct, there is no reason to believe your explanation is correct.

Unfortunately, it is all too common to tell people to seek psychological help or take their meds or what have you. Such advice is too often intended to be insulting or as a mask for poor logic. But I'm telling you this in all seriousness: If you really believe what you're saying, you need to get some counseling.

I was and am interested if somebody else would agree with me, that there really is an increase in the blinking.

It is easy to see it on television. If some of you really try, maybe you will observe it. Espically on the news it is easy to see.

It probably IS true that newscasters blink a lot. If you've ever seen a news studio, you'd know it's full of VERY BRIGHT lights.

I've participated in video interviews - mostly from the sidelines. The lights are REALLY intense. You blink a lot and you sweat like a pig - at least I do and so does everyone I've ever witnessed participate in it.

It is the increase the last year which is interesting.

"It is the increase the last year which is interesting."

I don't have a firm explanation for that, but I did suggest a possibiity. Let me be more explicit. I mentioned my problem with temporary blindness (extreme blurry vision). My eye doc said it was a common problem with programmers and that we need to learn to blink even when we concentrate. I can guess that people in news studios have a similar kind of problem and perhaps they have spread the word that blinking is okay and it helps.

Another possibility is that they have somehow changed the way studio lighting is done - more effective, but also more stressful for the subjects.

Hackers getting into the satellite system is not anywhere on my list of likely explanations.

Maybe jumping between a lot of sound bite poses quickly causes a lot of blinking.

Aloha, Charlie

The staccato movements probably have disturbed and destroyed music records the last months.

Films and movies with famous actors have also been disturbed and destroyed by the staccato movements and the blinking increase.

The blinking increase affects 'music' records?

Cansouth, really. I'm really not out to attack you. You need to talk some things through with a counselor.

You ever hear of a guy named John Nash. Starting thinking strange thoughts and totally weirded out for a number of years. In his acceptance speech for the Nobel prize (the real one, not the one in the movie, which I've never seen) he came to the conclusion that his perceptions had to be wrong because they were illogical. He never admitted that he didn't continue to have delusional thinking, but somehow he was able to think his way through the delusions. I suspect it takes an extraordinary person to do this. For most of us, I suspect, once our brain starts malfunctioning, we're not able to recover by ourselves.

"The blinking increase affects 'music' records?"

No, not the blinking increase.

But the staccato movements probably have destroyed music lately.

It is very easy to see the blinking increase on the newsreporter Mark Crumpton on Bloomberg News television. He blinks much too much.

But it is also easy to see the blinking increase on a lot of other persons.

wow you really are into this aren?t you, I would say compared to other "older" footage culture might have played a part in it , older movies and television shows had crazy quirks this COULD be one . . But hackers making people blank allot, it could be optometrists preventing eye disorders. . Your thoughts?

My tinfoil hats stopped working. The mind-control beams began getting through again.

Then I realized that they weren't tinfoil. They were aluminum foil.

Duh, no wonder.

I got me a nice heavy old deep-sea-diver helmet. I'm much better now.

http://www.physorg.com/news5431.html
July 26, 2005

"Most people blink around 15 times a minute and a blink lasts on average 100-150 milliseconds, which means that overall we spend at least 9 days per year blinking. "

Identification of the hacker and his friend:

1: The hacker: Slim, with carismatic eyes, kind of natural "silver hair", the hair is a little bit long, he uses dungaree trousers, 180 cm (?) tall.

2. His friend: Blond, normal looking, 175 cm(?)., not slim, not fat. Probably he was at the airport in Berlin in Germany in June 2005.

Both of these two were at the police station of Policia de Madrid San Blas in Madrid in Spain in June 2005.

jjw asked:
"Are you suggesting that a hacker has dubbed a satellite in some way that causes transmissions of TV signals to effect only peoples eyes so they appear to blink more often?"

Cansouth said:

No.
All people in the area the satellites send signals, blink more and behave more staccato.

It has nothing to do with tv. But it is easy to see it on tv.

Rep:
If it has nothing to do with Tv, but you can see the results on tv, then how sould we break it down to a source? Are you suggesting these bad "signals" that hackers are sending make the people blink more and that is all? Is there some deeper effect that you suspect that has not been discussed? Awake- there are many reasons for people to blink. Unless there is something more or that blinking is a symptom pf spmething more you will not win much favor in this forum.
jjw

Well, it should be possible to observe the increase of blinking in daily life also. But I find it more easy to observe it on television. I suspect the illegal satellite signals increase peoples eye blinking especially when people are concentrated.

I suspect the signals indirectly give people slightly higher blood pressure, especially because of the staccato movements, but also the blinking increase contributes to higher blood pressure, even if only a little bit, though.

Cansouth:

I did a quick searh of the Web to find some relationship between high blood pressure and blinking and I found none. That does not mean there is no data available - just that i did not find any. I am inclind to conclude that your suspected results can not be confirmed on the basis of high blood pressure, which is also not confirmed on the basis of signals and lastly the blinking repetitions may be for your eyes only.
A very curious post. I believe you are sincere.
jjw

The blinking increase probably increase the high blood pressure JUST A LITTLE BIT, so it may not show up visibly in statistics. For people who already have high blood pressure and are close to heart attacks, this "little" increase may lead to heart attacks.

I am not sure if the blinking increase lead to a little bit higher blood pressure. It is an assumption.


The staccato movements though, will maybe, or maybe already have, lead to a statistic visible increase in higher blood pressure. I dont think the staccato movements are healthy.


The blinking increase is easy to observe on television. Especially on people who are concentrated when they speak on television.

The satellite hacker seems to have started with a new signal:

People use their hands to touch their own heads, noses, chins, mouths and faces more then normal . It has probably lasted at least since saturday 21. November 2005. It is easy to observe also this on television.

The blinking increase and staccato movements may have started monday 6. June 2005.

So now there should be at least three visible symptoms of the illegal satellite signals:
1. The increased eye-blinking.
2. The staccato movements.
3. People touch their own heads/noses/chins//mouths/faces more then normal.

Right now on CNN, the judge in the trial against Saddam Hussein, makes those hand movements which are increased in frequency by the illegal satellite signals.

It is though not very often those movements happen. Maybe they appear in an interval of 2-3 minutes each time.

Here are two more quite visible examples of the new hand movements probably caused by the illegal satellite signals:

1. The people who sit beside and behind Saddam Hussein in the trial in Bagdad, move their hands quite a lot up to touch their faces. I saw it on CNN earlier today. It was very visible.

2. On Eurosport they have a program called Eurogoals. In the game between Zaragoza and Sevilla on the 27.11.2005, a goalkeeper is excluded. When he is about to leave the field he uses his hand on his nose. That looked like a typical movement like those which are a result of the illegal satellite signals. It does not have to be in this single case, but at least it looked like it was.

Here are some examples of the hand movements which have increased in frequency because of illegal satellite signals:

Example 1:
Source


Example 2:
Source
http://gfx.dagbladet.no/pub/artikkel/4/45/450/450643/saddam1.jpg
(This photo is very large, so I dont put it in the post)
The hand movements of the person to the left and the person to the right.

1.
On the APEC meeting on Saturday 19. of November 2005 in Busan in South-Corea, CNN send pictures of the state leaders wearing traditional clothes.

On the video which CNN send, there were many hand movements caused by the illegal satellite signals. It was easy to observe them.

Source


2.
In the German soccer game 19. of November 2005 between Borussia Dortmund and Hertha Berlin, it was also possible to observe some of these hand movements caused by the illegal satellite signals.

"On the video which CNN send, there were many hand movements caused by the illegal satellite signals. It was easy to observe them."

You haven't produced any evidence that these hand movements are caused by illegal satellite signals.
You have a belief that is not supported by facts.

All,

I would suggest that we do not engage at all with Cansouth on this subject.

Even to consider this semi-seriously will feed into his schizophrenia and is not helping him at all.

Cansouth, I used to work as a counsellor with schizophrenics and your thoughts and reasoning on this whole subject are exactly what I would expect to see from someone who is suffering with mental illness. Are you currently taking medication?

If not I would suggest you visit your local doctor and explain your thoughts about hacked satellites to him/her. The longer you allow yourself to go unmedicated, the more potential long-term damage you are doing. The quicker these things are caught, the better the results.

Regards,

Blacknad.

(This is the only useful response we can give to Cansouth).

Thanks for calling a spade a spade. Now if cansouth would only take your words to heart....

Here is a link to more photos of the hand movements which have increased in frequency:

http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=3039

1.
Now the trial against Saddam Hussein has started again, and CNN sends a lot from it.

Saddam Hussein and the other accused make a lot of the hand movements which the illegal satellite signals increase. Also the judge make some.

It seems to be people who are physical relaxed who react most visibly on the signals which increase hand movements.

2.
Also politicians who only listen to others speeches in parliaments, seem to react quite visibly on the signals which increase hand movements.

3.
And people who are concentrated, like news presenters, react more visibly on the signals which increase the eye blinking.

The increase in blinking is caused by stronger lights. As resolution is improved on television apparatus, the quality of picture is more important, and this is achieved by light. Remember also that they read from the teleprompter, and this causes blinking. Why are we even discussing this. Stupid.

I'm worried about you, too. Do you have a friend to help you get an appointment with a psychiatrist? Because most people reading your ideas about blinking think you are either joking or going crazy.

Three more examples of the hand movements which are increased by illegal satellite movements.


http://us.news1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/rids/20051128/i/ra2425485797.jpg

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/41097000/jpg/_41097566_cchair203.jpg

http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2005/WORLD/meast/12/06/saddam.hussein.trial/story.saddam1.tues.ap.jpg

Cansouth: Hvor skal du med dette her? Tulling.

(translates - idiot!)

Two more photos with hand movements which are typical results of the illegal satellite signals:

The judge in the Saddam Hussein trial:


Norwegian minister Kristin Halvorsen:

I am not a technical expert, but I think it is like this:


A. The person which has hacked satellites, probably uses private equipment to reach the satellites directly. Then the companies, which are technical responsible for the satellites, do not observe the hacking.


B. Normal satellite signals are so large that they do not get into the brains of human beings. But the hacker sends very fine small signals which enter inside peoples brains. These signals then hit nerve systems or functions systems in peoples brains. Then the hacker can make human beings behave different than normal.


C. Thin metal protection will probably not help. Normally the brain cranium stops at least large parts of satellite signals.

The illegal satellite signals are so fine (high-resolution) that they enter through the cranium and metal.

When hospitals do brain scanning, signals enter through the brain cranium.

Articles about brain scanning:
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/brain/scanning/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4715327.stm


D. If you observe the increase in the mentioned hand movements, you can report it to:

Interpol
http://www.interpol.net/

The Swedish government
http://www.regeringen.se/

The Norwegian government
http://www.odin.no/

The German government
http://www.bundesregierung.de/en

The Spanish government
http://www.la-moncloa.es/default.htm

The Swiss government
http://www.admin.ch/ch/index.en.html

Here is a link to a website where information about the satellite hacking is collected:

http://www.geocities.com/hackedsatellites/

It was probably the satellite hacker who made president George W. Bush write this note the 14. of September 2005:



http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-1781796,00.html
http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/uriks/article1115556.ece

Note that it happened after 6. of June 2005 when the illegal satellite beams may have started.


The note President Bush wrote about visiting the bathroom, was written the 14. of September 2005, a few days after 11. september. He wrote it in United Nations during a Security Council meeting in New York. In the same organisation where Colin Powell argued for going to war against Iraq. I think maybe the hacker chose that council meeting to make an anniversary memorial of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, wars which were started with the 11. september 2001 terror as one of the official reasons.




http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/index.html

cansouth I think you can be one of four things. 1, You are studing our answers
2, You are a hacker
3, You are correct
4, You are bored(I am being polite)

I have one for your quote. Did Jackie kill JFK because he killed her baby three weeks before

Ok...my thoughts on satellites are this...why are so many up there?Who's keeping surveilance of the entire world and for what reasons? One reason could be to detect threats from space, this i can understand,but it probably doesn't stop there.Invasion of human privacy is in effect, but it doesn't bother me as much and i really dont care who's watching me as long as they are not interfering with my life in any way.There is no reason to be paranoid unless your running from the government!