Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online Now
0 members (), 619 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Top Posters(30 Days)
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
O
Orac Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
Can anyone please tell me what you call it when you don't meet the conditions of a law and therefore can't use it

To put it in context

The second law of thermodynamics is an expression of the tendency that over time, differences in temperature, pressure, and chemical potential equilibrate in an isolated physical system

Expressly I am not saying the law is violated or anything I am trying to describe the periods when you are outside the law because like in the law above

You haven't had enough time to reach equilibrium or the physical system is not isolated.

The joys of trying to work across languages.

I wanted to call it a local violation but the very use of the word violation seems to get people upset.

Anyone able to help with what those periods are called?

.
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,570
B
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
B
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,570
Hi, Orac, (wasn't that the computer from "Blake's Seven"?), welcome.

Hopefully someone with more expertise will come up with the real term, but if you need something in a hurry, how about a non-applicability?


There never was nothing.
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
O
Orac Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
Thank you for that .. will try that as a definition

I am a physics computer programmer/modeller and trying to work with an astrophysics group in english not my native language .... they are doing my head in over the 2nd law they make it way harder than it is.

We always just view it as the law of energy distribution with elasticty but they want to go into inane discriptions of probability. I go yes I know it involves probability but thats only to provide the elasticity.

I don't get how they haven't realized the 2nd law and General relativity are almost joined at the hip the universe has to have some elasticity you can't transact and balance all energy universe wide given the finite speed of light.

We are used to modelling huge plants and electrical systems and energy changes in sub systems all have there own loop closure times but these guys seem to not think of the universe of one big system that all transactions are balanced like every plank time or something ... doing my head in !!!!!


I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
O
Orac Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
And yes Orac was the computer off "blake's seven" :-)


I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.

Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact UsokÂþ»­¾W
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5