Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online Now
0 members (), 388 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Top Posters(30 Days)
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 90
S
Member
OP Offline
Member
S
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 90
Heat reaction, yield engines and absurdities of modern physics

The text analysis a paradox of actual thermodynamics, leaved unexplored by
actual mainstream physics: why a diesel engines has a greater yield by
comparison with a petrol engine? More precisely a relative increase of reaction
heat with 12% (diesel greater then petrol) leads to a relative increase engine
yield of 28%.
Further, it is explored the case of an alcohol solution burning. Despite of a much
lower reaction heat, such solution can lead to a yield comparable or even
superior to a diesel or petrol engine. Of course small modifications for engine
combustion are necessary.
Last but not least, this new theory of thermodynamics rule out Carnot formula.
The link :
http://www.elkadot.com/ro/termodinamica/Randamentul.htm
Those interested in receiving the latest news about a new theory of science are
invited to subscribe on the forum at www.elkadot.com. Posts on the other
discussion forums are occasionally.
Best regards,
Sorin Cosofret

.
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
O
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
If thats the sort of rubbish on the site ... no thanks.

Most on my 1st year uni students could answer those questions for you without a problem.

The bit I really loved

Quote:

Thermodynamics current is unable to explain why we have this major difference between the return on a carburetor engine (35%) and diesel (45%).

We made ​​a rough calculation to elucidate this paradox.



Your basic problem is you really don't understand the processes at all you have shown that with this half baked analysis.

Even a basic link like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_efficiency would have given you the answer

Quote:

The higher compression ratio is helpful in raising the energy efficiency, but diesel fuel also contains approximately 10% more energy per unit volume than gasoline which contributes to the reduced fuel consumption for a given power output.


Somehow you managed to get Gasoline 12% higher in energy !!!!!

Even if they were equal the diesel will always win because the process can occur at a higher pressure (compression ratio) than gasoline.

I think that shows how good you total analysis is.

Back to the classroom for you I think.


I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.

Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact UsokÂþ»­¾W
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5