Bucha crap. It's not about how many calories you get out. It's about how many calories you put in to get one calorie out. Brazilian ethanol uses essentially slave labor on cleared Amazon jungle. Three years later they clear some more. Iowa uses fertilizer, insecticide, tractors, and government subsidies while the EPA eviscerates the process as a whole.
The entire planet's photosynthesis would supply 40% of US annual energy consumption - assuming no energy was expended in doing it. The engineering answer is more like 10%.
Science 312(5781) 1743-1747 (2006)
If you want net energy production then it is fossil fuels, hydroelectric, or nuclear. Solar and wind are sparrow farts. Anything photosynthetic is an inescapable loser.
Biomass starts out wet. Non-recoverable 540 cal/g heat of vaporization for water at 100 C, more at room temp. Are ya gonna power the American economy with green wood? Grass? Algae?