Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online Now
0 members (), 388 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Top Posters(30 Days)
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 310
RicS Offline OP
Senior Member
OP Offline
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 310
G'day all,

This was a thread in the not quite science section but I think it involves hard science and even though it isn't as earth shattering as why bumble bees fly, it still has a scientific interest.

Samwick raises a really interesting point. You can find it at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Shower-curtain_effect

I can't experiment on this myself. I can't use a shower by myself and we don't have a curtain but I'm sure all shower curtains have not been replaced by now and the effect really can be quite annoying, especially, as I recall in hotel rooms. It seems to me, from personal observation, that the size of the room makes a big difference. The whole curtain will wrap around you if the bathroom is small enough such as a cheap hotel. It also seems to have a much stronger attraction to naked females than to men wink .

Surely an observational experiment can easily be devised to test Sam's hypothesis. It should be interesting. And I volunteer to view the video if he wishes to test the difference between the female and male form. Well at least the female trials. Maybe the experiment could see if more than one female form creates an even bigger effect. OK blatantly sexist but, hey, I'm human, and suffering from a spinal injury, can really do nothing except dream.


Regards


Richard


Sane=fits in. Unreasonable=world needs to fit to him. All Progress requires unreasonableness
.
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 9
C
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
C
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 9
Oh my gosh! i am sooo sorry that you are hurt! this was great!


Carling N. Repass
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,164
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,164
Y'know, this is not just a funny story; there's an actual experiment that anyone can try. Should only take a couple of minutes....
~Sam


Pyrolysis creates reduced carbon! ...Time for the next step in our evolutionary symbiosis with fire.
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 310
RicS Offline OP
Senior Member
OP Offline
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 310
G'day all,

Sorry Sam, didn't mean to make light of the subject but it just sort of popped out. While it is not an earth shattering field, it is certainly real science and should be of interest to many.

Certainly I'd be interested to know why it does it and whether my observation that smaller rooms seem to make the effect more pronounced. Maybe my memory is faulty. It was one of life's little annoyances. And I'm a big fan of looking at seemingly minor matters to establish the often no so minor science behind it. Grew up watching shows like Professor Julius Sumner Miller and his kitchen experiments and his "Why is it so?" A great introduction into science. Professer Miller was famous only on Australian TV but I'm sure there were similar shows in other parts of the world.


Regards


Richard


Sane=fits in. Unreasonable=world needs to fit to him. All Progress requires unreasonableness
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,164
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,164
Not at all Richard, I liked your musings. My comment was directed, hypothetically, at those who also might enjoy your take on things, but not follow up -maybe thinking it was too hard or complex. I suppose wading thru my rantings on the wikipedia 'talk' page might be asking a bit much, but the basic testing of whether hot showers suck and cold showers blow or suck -and by how much, shouldn't take too much time. Maybe a thread entitled Suck or Blow would attract more attention....LOL
~~Sam


Pyrolysis creates reduced carbon! ...Time for the next step in our evolutionary symbiosis with fire.
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,164
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,164
My main interest with this question is that this has become accepted dogma just based on one scientific paper. I get the feeling that you understand my objections to deciding an issue based on just one paper; especially one that only examines one side of the issue.
~Sam


Pyrolysis creates reduced carbon! ...Time for the next step in our evolutionary symbiosis with fire.
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 174
J
Senior Member
Offline
Senior Member
J
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 174
A cold shower does not produce this effect to anywhere near the same extent. A hot shower heats the air that ends up rising with the steam. The cold air near the floor fills the void by pushing the shower curtain in. Counteracting that force by making the water spray against the curtain can help. Magnets in the curtain can help somewhat too. I know it is hot water because while the effect is happening, I can counteract it every time by reducing the heat of the water. Likewise, increasing the flow rate of the hot water increases the movement of the shower curtain again.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,164
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,164
Thanks John, that's what I was hoping to hear. For my shower cold water even makes the curtain move outward pressing it up against the lip (maybe it's more noticable in a shower "stall" like I have). So far, I've not heard anyone speak to outward movement like that, but I've got a very small bathroom too. As Richard conjectured, bouyancy effects may be more pronounced the smaller the room. That'd explain why I noticed a bigger difference with the door closed too. Thanks again....
~Sam


Pyrolysis creates reduced carbon! ...Time for the next step in our evolutionary symbiosis with fire.
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,164
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,164
Don't know why I didn't think... I've got an upstairs bathroom (full size w/ tub and curtain). So it definitely supports the buoyancy side of things. With the bigger room the cold effect seemed about neutral, but I taped the sides of the curtain shut. That led to a slight outward billowing. With hot water I got about a 4 inch deflection inward of the bottom of the curtain and when I opened the door, it went up to about 6 inches. I noticed just moving around in the bathroom and opening/closing the door caused disturbances in the curtain too. Luke, I feel a disturbance in the bathroom. smile
~Sam


Pyrolysis creates reduced carbon! ...Time for the next step in our evolutionary symbiosis with fire.

Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact UsokÂþ»­¾W
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5