Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online Now
0 members (), 181 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Top Posters(30 Days)
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
N
newton Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
N
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
Hubble's law

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble%27s_law


mathematica is telling Us that Red [censored] it is not final Evidence
that we have Expantion !

rotation aslso is able give Red Shift




Very simple test





.
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
O
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
I will respond to this one because it contains an obvious huge layman error

There are actually three types of redshift normal motional redshift, gravitational redshift and cosmological redshift and they all behave differently and have different formula.

Lets try to put this in really simple terms for you Marosz

Normal motion doppler shift is about the change in light which is approaching, receding because of the motion of the object relative to you, you understand this one. Cosmological redshift is about what happened to the light while it is in transit.

When we look at redshift data from stars and galaxies it contains both redshifts in different amounts and if it is important you need to do a detailed analysis to separate them out.

The formula for the two different forms is given here

http://burro.astr.cwru.edu/Academics/Astr328/Notes/Redshift/redshift.html

The image at the bottom shows an example of testing a star or galaxy against a cosmological redshift to make sure it is correct. If I ran the analysis against motional redshift formula the result is so far out it would be hard to represent.

I have left out discussion on gravitational redshift which you can also measure and has been confirmed.

So this whole idea is completely wrong but that never seems to bother Marosz !!!!!!!!

What I will warn you is if you try this on a normal physics forum they will ban you because it is to stupid for them to bother with.

Last edited by Orac; 01/25/16 02:20 AM.

I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
N
newton Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
N
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
Great Orac

Your own Words :
"There are actually three types of redshift normal motional redshift .... "



DO YOU LIKE Michelson Morley TEST ?
DO WE HAVE DOPPLER ?




why they writing in books FALSE about ZERO



I WANT TO ASK YOU ALSO ABOUT FUNDAMENTAL EXPERIMENT
FOR QUANTUM MECHANIC


around single electron we have many waves


Waves are hiting electron and going back




DO YOU LIKE QUANTUM PHYSICS ?
YOUNG's EXPERIMENT = TRUE OR FALSE ?

https://youtu.be/3_BzTMeV4HI


ELECTRON is at ONE TIME in two places ????

ORAC ... we are not childrean all is very LOGIC
we can find DOPPLER on screen and we can read

P=mV for electron with huge precission !!!


DO I LEARN YOU ? or I'm Idiot ?

MY TEST = DISCOVERY OR NOT ?






GALILEO ????
EXIST ALSO DOPLER FOR DYNAMICA "FORCE SHIFT" !!!





EACH COLOUR = not the same force !!!



Can You find materials in books about my work ?
I'm first ... person or I copied my work ???








Galilean relativity ????? ?*********************************************************
Imagine a person inside a ship which is sailing on a perfectly smooth lake at constant speed. This passeneger is in the ship's windowless hull and, despite it being a fine day, is engaged in doing mechanical experiments (such as studying the behavior of pendula and the trajectories of falling bodies). A simple question one can ask of this researcher is whether she can determine that the ship is moving (with respect to the lake shore) without going on deck or looking out a porthole.
Since the ship is moving at constant speed and direction she will not feel the motion of the ship. This is the same situation as when flying on a plane: one cannot tell, without looking out one of the windows, that the plane is moving once it reaches cruising altitutde (at which point the plane is flying at constant speed and direction). Still one might wonder whether the experiments being done in the ship's hull will give some indication of the its motion. Based on his experiments Galileo concluded that this is in fact impossible: all mechanical experiments done inside a ship moving at constant speed in a constant direction would give precisely the same results as similar experiments done on shore.
The conclusion is that one observer in a house by the shore and another in the ship will not be able to determine that the ship is moving by comparing the results of experiments done inside the house and ship. In order to determine motion these observers must look at each other. It is important important to note that this is true only if the ship is sailing at constant speed and direction, should it speed up, slow down or turn the researcher inside can tell that the ship is moving. For example, if the ship turns you can see all things hanging from the roof (such as a lamp) tilting with respect to the floor
Generalizing these observations Galileo postulated his relativity hypothesis:
???
any two observers moving at constant speed and direction with respect to one another will obtain the same results for all mechanical experiments
???
(it is understood that the apparatuses they use for these experiments move with them).
In pursuing these ideas Galileo used the scientific method (Sec. 1.2.1): he derived consequences of this hypothesis and determined whether they agree with the predictions.
This idea has a very important consequence: velocity is not absolute. This means that velocity can only be measured in reference to some object(s), and that the result of this measurment changes if we decide to measure the velocity with respect to a diferent refernce point(s).


[b]Imagine an observer traveling inside a windowless spaceship moving away from the sun at constant velocity. Galileo asserted that there are no mechanical experiments that can be made inside the rocket that will tell the occupants that the rocket is moving . The question ``are we moving'' has no meaning unless we specify a reference frame


[/b](``are we moving with respect to that star'' is meaningful). This fact, formulated in the 1600's remains very true today and is one of the cornerstones of Einstein's theories of relativity.
***************************************************************

HISTORY

1600 Galilean relativity /Natural Fall Law

1861 J. C. Maxwell, published his theory of electromagnetic fields and radiation, which shows that light has momentum and thus can exert pressure on objects.

1901 P. N. Lebedev EXPERIMENTAL EXAMINATION OF LIGHT PRESSURE


2012 MAROSZ NOT exist C+V !!!!!!

Situation A : I turned ON Em Source and nothing happen
Situation B /C : I turned ON Em Source and I started slowing down !
EUREKA I CAN FEEL MOTION WITOUT "SEE" MOTION !




MAROSZ(me) we are mowing respect to own OLD position this fact we can easy mesure ! Dynamica it is absolute frame below I showing rocket without windows and person inside !












Last edited by newton; 01/26/16 08:58 AM.
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
N
newton Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
N
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
VERY VERY INTRESTING PROBLEM FOR PHYSICS

PLEASE read about EM drive in web

2011 Grover Swartzlander first began to examine a revolutionary concept in optical physics after studying the flight of a moth. He watched the animal use its wings to create lift, which led to flight. Swartzlander asked : Could light be used to create the same effect?

https://youtu.be/PabPQbCnJz4


MAROSZ My test + Swartzlander ?




EM drive !!!




C postulate !!! FALSE



Gearbox for EM drive




NEW TYPE MY OWN EM DRIVE ENGINE
perpendicular wing





NATURAL MOTION DEFINITION

short time ago in Past SUN was in point p1..p2..p3.


p1..p2...p3...SUN >>>

Sun will be in point p4..p5....pn




Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact UsokÂþ»­¾W
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5