Einstein speaking on the publication "The One Hundred Authors Against Einstein", said why 100 it would take only one falsification to make me wrong. No-one in science remembers or even cares about the authors who made fools of themselves smile
LOL , I could care less about the 100 authors that knew that
Einstein was wrong ... for me it only took a few minutes looking at the math he used to prop up his theories to make that decision.
and books that contain only words that describe a theory
accompanied by designer math to prop up that theory mean as much ( actually less ) to me as a piece of gum stuck to the bottom of my shoe ( because the gum is real ).
for instance einsteins dictation about the physical speed of light.
Absolutely and we even encourage it, believe anything you like so long as it is consistent, testable and fits all known data
the speed of light is known , a photon travels at the speed
of light , a photon has mass , so at first the followers of Einstein claimed that light had no mass in order to pacify
and further prop up einsteins theories (
fits all known data ) a theory is not data , data is collected from observation and experiment not words in a book
or the accompanying designer math in a book.
now it is known that a photon has mass.
but if you write a program to predict the speed of a
photon of light using einsteins math then even light cannot travel at the speed of light.
HE WAS WRONG !!!
it would take only one falsification to make me wrong
the victors write history.
BE IT RIGHT OR WRONG !!!
BE IT SCIENTIFIC OR NON SCIENTIFIC !!!
Absolutely and we even encourage it, believe anything you like so long as it is consistent, testable and fits all known data
about the testable part ...
test results that have built in Einstein designer math
built into the measuring equipment will always be wrong.
Absolutely and we even encourage it, believe anything you like so long as it is consistent, testable, and fits all known data
now about the consistent part ...
a guess or a prediction is not a consistency.
Absolutely and we even encourage it, believe anything you like so long as it is consistent, testable and fits all known data
which leaves you with the actual reality of.
Absolutely and we even encourage it, believe anything you like.
what I like the most about the classical physics discipline
is that it never has depended on a belief system the way the undisciplined BS physics does , unlike the diverse BS physics the foundation of classical physics is built from solid tried and true reality.
religion is about spirituality and belief and faith and science is not a religion or a belief system or about faith.