Welcome toScience a GoGo'sDiscussion Forums
 Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away. Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use. So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated. The Forums General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction
 You are not logged in. [Log In] Science a GoGo's Home Page » Forums » General Discussion » Physics Forum » New Gravitation's Model + New EM Aether Register User    Forum List        Calendar         FAQ
 Who's Online 0 registered (), 136 Guests and 4 Spiders online. Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
 Latest Posts ENERGY REDIRECTION MAROSZ - ŁĄGIEWKA by newton Yesterday at 12:11 PM All about Gravitation by newton 05/21/17 03:21 PM Full explanation EM DRIVE BUILD by newton 05/16/17 08:23 PM Proton's speed respect to PULSAR A point ( MAROSZ) by newton 05/11/17 04:23 PM 2017 2nd International Conference on Communication by BERYL 05/11/17 07:11 AM 2017 6th EEM International Conference on Hospitali by BERYL 05/11/17 07:08 AM
Top Posters (30 Days)
 newton 9 BERYL 2 Kyra M 1 paul 1
 Topic Options
 #53349 - 11/09/14 03:12 AM New Gravitation's Model + New EM Aether newton Megastar Registered: 09/30/12 Posts: 1158 I very like prepare models ( I like ask my self " What will be if ?")New Aether's model In universe exist N objects N objects is sending N waves ( Electro-Magetic waves ) Everything is moving ( doppler is mixing " N " special Hz )How look one cubic meter of space ? How Many Joules are inside one cubic meters ? VERY IMPORTANT !!!above I showed that we can use basic SI units and explain Electro-Magnetic Pascal ! ( it is My Own idea ) Joul / meter^3 = Newton *m/m^3 = N/m^2 ( pascal ) MAROSZ analogy to INVERSE SQUARE LAW we have INVERSE CUBIC LAW 2x more big ball = 8x lower EM preasurewe need use 8x stronger bulb to keep the same EM preasure in biger ball Gravitaion ? When You are underwater and we have empty chamber water will go inside very fast Electrons are moving inside atoms = Electrons joust "Eat" special Hz ( EM wave ) - Electrons joust Eat energy from Aether. Earth is very big and fast truck !Czerenkow's radiation and motion inside Aether ?Below I showing Bernoli's equation and ball underwater ( Ball is making own rotation + motion ) this picture explain famous curve .Body that is moving joust hiting EM aether ( rotation or line motion ) = Czerenkow's radiation EM preasure where we will use (short future) Few weeks ago NASA SHOWED RAPORTS NASA's raport http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140006052 In 2012 I tested similar Engine in my home Please repeat my test http://youtu.be/cSsTWRt0VBATO PREPARE GOOD GRVITATION's MODEL YOU HAVE TO SEE HOW IMPORTANT ARE RADIAL FORCEhttp://maroszphysics.blogspot.com/ Top
 .
 #53352 - 11/09/14 03:42 PM Re: New Gravitation's Model + New EM Aether newton Megastar Registered: 09/30/12 Posts: 1158 Top
 #53357 - 11/10/14 08:59 AM Bulb and Rope = Bulb and Earth motion newton Megastar Registered: 09/30/12 Posts: 1158 very important problem is Air's inertia I have a problem right now http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Mry0nxUU74M/VGBy5Uta3pI/AAAAAAAACFg/B68sugnYIr4/s1600/MMR.jpg I'm very open for cooperation in home I tested 24h Earth's is making rotation in universe !!! !!! http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-gThxTVotyg0/VE_qRpbPYpI/AAAAAAAACCg/Rt8lAHpo9UY/s1600/CIMG3375.JPG WHERE IS MY CAMERA IN UNIVERSE ??? http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-QAAvQuZjtmI/UOhDTjKm0uI/AAAAAAAAAbU/_g7IkKC_K00/s1600/8x.JPG Light is pushing objects !!! ( Light Sail in satellite for example ) http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xt2orZVnMMY/VF91acc4BFI/AAAAAAAACFM/uHVRtjhKAqk/s1600/pmm.JPG HUGE PROBLEM FOR ME IS EVALUATE AIR's INERTIA !!! Where Bulb started 3D signal ? Where is "now" bulb respect to old own position ? Exist C+V ( LIGHT IS MOVING WITH BULB ???? ) I LOVE MACH ... I hope You will share my LOVE ... http://maroszphysics.blogspot.com Top
 #53371 - 11/11/14 03:47 AM Mathematical Evidence False - Michelson Morley. newton Megastar Registered: 09/30/12 Posts: 1158 Secoundary School mathematica and Evidence Michelson Morley False author Maciej Marian Marosz ( Poland ,city Walbrzych ) 11-11-2014if C + V or C- V = TRUE ===> below drawing is FALSE ( EM wave are not able make rotation with bulb respect to hand because not exist C+V) http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Mry0nxUU74M/VGBy5Uta3pI/AAAAAAAACFg/B68sugnYIr4/s1600/MMR.jpgwe are sure that not exist C+V or C - V respect to hand ( bulb is making rotation but EM wave joust making 3D background C speed only ) matematica : line motion for matematica = rotation with infinity radius ( easy to imagine and evaluate how big mistake we make for each radius )below rocket is making rotation (infinity radius) - it is analogy to situationthat I showed Bulb -------rope----X . Light for distance L need time T during this timerocket is escaping from point 1,2,3,4...http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xt2orZVnMMY/VF91acc4BFI/AAAAAAAACFM/uHVRtjhKAqk/s1600/pmm.JPGExperiment :Camera is open 24 h and registering point http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-gThxTVotyg0/VE_qRpbPYpI/AAAAAAAACCg/Rt8lAHpo9UY/s1600/CIMG3375.JPGX1.....................radius.................camera....1m....doth I'm sure that me and bulb and camera during 24h test are making rotation respect to some point X1 ( far far point in universe ) http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-QAAvQuZjtmI/UOhDTjKm0uI/AAAAAAAAAbU/_g7IkKC_K00/s1600/8x.JPGExperiment Part 1 > http://youtu.be/wkz0qD17IvY Part 2 > http://youtu.be/jjqt7Iz_UDQconclusionhttp://2.bp.blogspot.com/-mF862RHQBNA/VE_qFhdTZTI/AAAAAAAACCY/V3Q8y_GDAGA/s1600/25.jpgMichelson Morley Made Mistake ( it is FALSE experiment ) we can evaluate Our own constant linear motion : we need use only C and read L from picture during test During real experiment I relize that object (doth) is able become biger/shorter http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-arWCkT9Vr04/UwC7Q3qM0uI/AAAAAAAABlI/fJuRtMqUzbw/s1600/x.JPGmore problems in test http://maroszphysics.blogspot.com/******************************************************Mtematyczny Dowód Fałszu Testu Michelson Morley ( szkoła średnia ) ( pokazuje również prosty test do wykonania w domu ) Maciej Marian Marosz ( Polaska , Walbrzych 11-11-2014) Jeśli C + V LUB C- V Istnieje ===> poniższy rysunek jest Fałszywy ( fale EM nie mogą okrążać ręki razem z żarówką bo musiały by mieć prędkość C+V lub C-V względem ręki )http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Mry0nxUU74M/VGBy5Uta3pI/AAAAAAAACFg/B68sugnYIr4/s1600/MMR.jpg fale EM nie okrążają ręki razem z żarówką a jedynie tworzą 3D tło ( tylko żarówka okrąża rękę ) Róch liniowy to obrót o nieskończenie długim promieniu ( łatwo to udowodnić i podać pomyłkę (odchyłkę od linii ) dla dowolnego Rponiższa rakieta rotuje na nieskończenie długim promieniu.to analogiczny przypadek do pokazanej żarówki na linie http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xt2orZVnMMY/VF91acc4BFI/AAAAAAAACFM/uHVRtjhKAqk/s1600/pmm.JPGświatło nadane w punkcie 1,2,3,4... na pokonanie dystansu L potrzebuje czasu T w czasie tym rakieta pokonuje drogę S . Czoło fali udeży rakietę trochę dalej od lini normalnej Na zdjęciu pokazałem również że światło odpycha ciała w które uderza ( żagle świetlne stosuje się jako dopalacz obecnych satelitów)Na rakietę która stoi nieruchomo i porusza się zadziała inny moment siły Eksperyment kamera jest nieruhoma i otwarta 24h / rejestruje punkt swiatła który kreśli linie !http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-gThxTVotyg0/VE_qRpbPYpI/AAAAAAAACCg/Rt8lAHpo9UY/s1600/CIMG3375.JPGX1......................................kamera....1m....kropka Jestem pewien że kamera i żarówka w czasie 24 godzinnego testu wykonuje obrótwzględem odległego punktu w przestrzeni X1 http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-QAAvQuZjtmI/UOhDTjKm0uI/AAAAAAAAAbU/_g7IkKC_K00/s1600/8x.JPGEKSPERYMENT Cz 1 > http://youtu.be/dNveMtyYHaU Cz2 > http://youtu.be/jjqt7Iz_UDQWniosek http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-mF862RHQBNA/VE_qFhdTZTI/AAAAAAAACCY/V3Q8y_GDAGA/s1600/25.jpgMichelson Morley to fałszywy eksperyment możemy okreslić dystans L i wyznaczyć swoją prędkość stałą na podstawie stałej C i Odczytanego ze zdjęcia L w czsie testu odnotowałem również inny fakt obserwowany obiekt może być większy mniejszy dla matrycy aparatuhttp://3.bp.blogspot.com/-arWCkT9Vr04/UwC7Q3qM0uI/AAAAAAAABlI/fJuRtMqUzbw/s1600/x.JPGwięcej problemów :http://maroszphysics.blogspot.com Top
 #53407 - 11/19/14 09:37 AM NEW NATURAL FALL LOW newton Megastar Registered: 09/30/12 Posts: 1158 Above Law is for N objects Can we use it for 2 objects ? Folow the rules or break them ALL http://maroszphysics.blogspot.com Edited by newton (11/19/14 10:33 AM) Top

 Hop to: General Discussion ------   General Science Discussion Forum   Not-Quite-Science Forum   Sci Fi Forum   Physics Forum   Climate Change Forum
 Newest Members debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT 865 Registered Users
Sponsor
 Facebook We're on FacebookJoin Our Group

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact Us
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.