Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online Now
0 members (), 181 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Top Posters(30 Days)
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,136
P
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
P
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,136
well since were the only ones in the discussion that knows how to do math I suppose you would have a need to sit it out.

Im certain that when you find an opportunity to provide
lip service then you will step back in , since that is
really all you know how to do when science , and possibly
k12 math is involved.

you really are a piss poor example , even of someone that
holds a tiny amount of worthwhile knowledge laugh





3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.
.
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
O
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
Cool so you have put your maths and your reality on the line. Do you want to up the stakes and put your GOD on the result?

So how about it do you really believe or not?

Tell you what to sweeten the deal I will put it on the line. If you are right I will convert to the religion of your choice and give up science and spend the rest of my life promoting the religion.

Now all I need is Marosz to put his theory on the line and this could be worth doing smile

Last edited by Orac; 05/19/14 08:18 AM.

I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
N
newton Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
N
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
LAGIEWKA's EXPEIMENT
( POLAND 02/04/2013)


Part 1
4 : 24 three the same mass M



Part2
7: 55 small mass m asymetry ( m <<< M )




NOTICE !!!

AFTER COLLISION
( small mass will take close to 100 % energy Eo )


M*V -----> { three way pipe } M*Vx -->

Perpendicular direction is neutral for momentum



ORYGINAL SOURCE
http://youtu.be/FgsJrimgPiQ




WHERE IS CAMBRIDGE and MR SMITH

Who is MR SMITH ?

http://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/f1/understanding-the-j-damper/


He copied Lagiewka's Solution 100 %
and even don't know how it work !!!


YOU WANT TO COPY NEXT TOOL FROM POLAND
AND USE MY WORK !

( befor "NEXT MR SMITH" WILL USE MY TALENT PLEASE CALL ME I WILL PREPARE BETTER TOOL on web I not showed all smile

EINSTEIN = IDIOT


MAROSZ's INERTIA FRAME



MICHELSON MORLEY BRIGHTNESS VERSION
Poland 2012 first test






Discovery : brightness of pictures West and East are not the same
Reason ? Eart's Velocity 30 km/s = 30 000 000 mm/s
(NIKON 5000d remote start, zero outsite light ,stative, manual set ,
time 10s , F 8 , Iso 200 - /10 cm to bulb / filtre is important !!!)

first test
> http://youtu.be/XF_npmQ8kGY

first pictures ( brightness - photoshop 10 histogram) west ( -30km/s ) and East (+30 km/s )
> http://youtu.be/O9k-zidfJZg


author
MY PATENTS AND DESIGN VISION
http://tesla4.blogspot.com


MAROSZ 4 Principles ( NEW MECHANIC )
http://marosz-physics.blogspot.com/




Last edited by newton; 05/19/14 08:47 AM.
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
O
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
So do you want in on the bet then Marosz.

If you are right and the boat actually propels itself along like a normal boat I will immediately give up science and you can send everyone here I and will explain that physics is wrong along with having to convert to a new religion because of my bet with Paul.

However if the boat doesn't move forward and just sits there and rocks and rolls as the mass changes around with each piston pump you have to give up the theory and science and never come up with any more great ideas smile


I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
N
newton Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
N
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
GOOD TIP PHYSICS =ENERGY and energy exchange process "

ZERO THEORY only OBSERVATIONS !!!

use dynamica not eyes ( sometimes eyes = mistake it is not important what You see because see = illusion and speculations ( relativistica + Quntum = I never SAW THIS WHAT I DESCRIBING IN MY IMAGINATION !!! )



( Forces and momentu = NEWTON's idea - sometimes people making mistake. The problem is that people not like study problems. People joust are using books without brain ( not exist absolute true we all have to study !!! )



MArosz' Four Principles
1 ( not exist line motion in universe )
2 radial forces can redirect energy without reaction



3 INVERSE SQUARE LAW and GRAVITATION


4
Gravitation mass it is not the same what INertia mass

one mass

M ----> V



two mass 1/2 M

1/2 M ----> V ..........distance L .........1/2M ----> V


Inertia is the same for one mass M or two mass 1/2 M
but gravitation ???

There is no middle point of mass
in 1/2 distance L center

why ?

because exist Inverse Square Law and milions STARS around US


MAROSZ DISCOVERY

Galilleo's Natural Fall Down Law +
+ one paragraph more ( absolute motion & Inverse Square Law)


m----Earth----m ===> 30 km/s

Mass m left and right will never fall down on planet in one and the same time ( exist other Intensity of gravitation ) and
absolute kinetic energy !!!

WHY WE HAVE WINTER AND SUMMER



ENERGY IS GOING ISOTROPY RESPECT TO POINT WHERE LIGHT STARTED


















Last edited by newton; 05/19/14 11:08 AM.
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,136
P
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
P
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,136
orac

first off , I think your as dumb as a brick laugh.

and you never have exhibited any evidence to counter my
evaluation of your intelligence.

in fact if I had to guess I would say that a brick is
probably smarter than you are sick

I suppose you could counter my claims by pointing out that
bricks cant think , right? whistle

let me ask you a question mr brick brain , if you don't think
that his idea has value , then why do you think that race tracks have banked turns.

are race tracks banked to keep the asphalt from slipping off the track in the turns.

and about your bet , I only use bricks to prop things up
with.

which is currently what science uses them for
and you are a living testament of that fact.




3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
O
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
So put your GOD on the line, I have put my science beliefs on the line but you are being gutless.

Come on do it or stop talking, you are all mouth.

What the religious don't have backbones ... you are so sure you are right what can go wrong laugh

We don't need to argue and make a scene in the forum we have a straight test your god and his science versus my science. Let the HMS titanic sort out if your GOD or my science is stronger can't get fairer than that and save a lot of unseemly arguing because our maths and physics don't agree even according to you.

So come on put your belief on the line ... are you a real believer or not, I am and I have gone all in.

Last edited by Orac; 05/19/14 02:54 PM.

I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,136
P
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
P
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,136
well orac since you don't understand physics the below
will seem like a miracle to you , and you will be scratching
your brick trying to figure it out.

believe me its only applied knowledge , theres nothing
miraculous about it.

the guy in the video seems to know you orac , I keep hearing
one of my favorite carefully chosen descriptions of you in the video.



orac, I see you have applied your knowledge of the physical world
and made a video also.











3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
O
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
Again I have no intention to argue this with your and Marosz because there is no need.

WE HAVE A TEST PUT UP OR SHUT UP.

I am willing to walk away from science if I am wrong what are you worried about you are sure I am wrong.

Oh I am terrified by your video evidence and yet still I won't back down .... crazy hey I really want to get converted ... I am going to be the best goat god worshiper ever.

For a religious man you don't have very much faith.

What the good ship HMS Titanic not going to save us all from the flood?

I have to say you are not a patch on Rev K who for a start would not be stupid enough to get in the position you have put yourself and if he ended there he would have the faith to follow his conviction. I walked you right into this and you didn't even see it coming.

So how does it feel to be out faithed by a lowly janitor who believes in science ... feeling a little trapped perhaps laugh

No amount of abuse will save you Paul you either have faith or you don't and you have answered the question as a have I.

I wonder if your pollack mate has more guts and faith than you, is he a true believer smile

Last edited by Orac; 05/19/14 03:28 PM.

I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,136
P
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
P
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,136
Quote:
I am willing to walk away from science if I am wrong


wow , what a prize. (( not really )LOL)
that is very tempting orac. (( not really )LMFAO)
hopefully the people at the disney studios quantum studios wont get wind of your offer to improve science
and join in with their immense vastness of BS nothingness
and place the same wager.

can I sell you some bear stearns stock? its obvious that
you value worthlessness because you seem to think that
your offer to walk away from science would have some value
that could be used in a wager , from what I have observed
you either never approached science or you walked away from
science years ago.











3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
O
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
That the best you got Mr Faithless.

You were tested and failed.

Pretty sure that ends this thread because neither of you really believes as has been demonstrated.

Last edited by Orac; 05/19/14 03:38 PM.

I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,136
P
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
P
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,136
so when you apply your brick brain to a problem
it tells you that all you have to do is write a
bunch of BS in order to achieve a solution to the
problem?

then it tells you that you are the victor because of
the BS you have written.

and that all of the involved parties interested in solving
the problem should just take your BS as a solution to the
problem and walk away from it.

I would laugh with you orac , if I were I not laughing at you.


3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
N
newton Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
N
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
Mr Lagiewka live 70 km from my home

I spoke with him about my own Idea

He told me that he want to measure absolute Earth motion
and he want to use classical mechanic

His words was inspiration to my test

Michelson Morley Brightness ( Inverse Square Law Version )

later I started think about gravitation

for gravitation and for light ( inverse square law = the same problem - we have wery similar equations in books )


ENERGY RISE UP ISOTROPY but ISOTROPY ONLY RESPECT TO POINT WHERE
WAVE STARTED AND ONLY IN IDEAL SYMETRY VACUUM


FOR EXAMPLE IN AIR WE HAVE INERTIA PROBLEM


sensor ---->30 km/s AIR ----> 30 km/s <<< Light


Light >>> AIR ----> 30 km/s sensor ---->30 km/s


AIR = conveyer ( machine that is transporting light )

Air not give ISOTROPY resistance for ligth


EACH ANIMAL FEEL THAT RIVER IS MOVING !!!!

transport inside air = different energy lost for Each direction


AIR = MEDIUM

the same medium = electric wire for electrons


+.........electric wire .........- ---> 30 km/s

-.........electric wire..........+ ----> 30 km/s


To wake up electrons ( +/- or -/+ ) we will use not the same energy ( direction and medium motion is important )

electron = mass m

electron is inside wire

wire and Earth are moving around SUN we have radial forces and
speed problem (Energy respect to stationary space )


Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact UsokÂþ»­¾W
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5