Science a GoGo's Home Page Forums General Discussion Physics Forum 2 mass = SYMETRY but Three mass = ASYMETRY

youtu.be ?

it has no certificate.

try youtube.com instead.

http://listofscams.blogspot.com/2011/07/youtube-links-hackvirus-alert.html

Paul
all the pistons are the same size so the mercury will move slower and will have a lower velocity than the water because
the mercury is heavier than the water.


Paul Please not forget about spring 1 VS spring 2

green (oil ) go to left and to right the same ===>
water and mercury velocity is the same !!!

for liquid capacity / time and pipe diameter = velocity

for example
spring 1 = TANK 1
spring 2 = TANK 2



we can very precission change preasure in tank 1 and tank 2
during person inside boat is pushing.

we can steering the process to keep the same speed
inside pipe full of water and full of mercury

Preasure inside tank 1 and tank 2
it is different resistance for (green) oil .
Green oil joust pushing in one and the same time water and mercury

the same energy will go to left and to right side
( Force x distance x time = the same )
and velocity inside pipes must be the same


only radial force will be different !!!


we can use nozzle ( spring 1 big diameter , spring 2 small diameter )



we can use two taps ( spring 1 mercury = full open )
( spring 2 - water minimal open )

no , the water and mercury velocity will not be the same.

unless you use something that will have different resistance
to the pistons that push the mercury and water.

if you use tanks with different sized orifices to allow the pistons
to move at the same velocity then you will have achieved the same thing
that springs with different strengths would have achieved.

theres really nothing special or new about this , reactionless propulsion
has been around for a long time its just that
theres more money to be made by using a propulsion system
that throws mass ( expanding gasses )in a direction
or causes mass to be thrown in a direction via an
explosion ( expanding gasses ) that pushes against a pistons surface.

if fuel were free we would no longer need fuel.

because fuel is only used because it cost money.

another way to think of the cost of fuel is that
it is a convenient way for the rich to have some of the money
that they have passed out for labor wages passed back
to them so they can pass it back out again the next week.

fuel prices have become a throttle or a valve used to
control the amount of money
that workers can put into a savings account , because
people having money in a savings account cost the rich money.

a = F/the mass of water being forced to move (01 g/cm^3)

a = F/the mass of mercury being forced to move (13.534 g/cm^3)

theres a big difference in mass so the water will accelerate faster than the mercury.

this means that the water side piston will move further
because it starts moving first and it moves faster than the mercury side piston.

unless you compensate for the difference in mass.

Preasure P1 and P2 is variable
During person is pushing "central piston" special taps system is able steering and control process - green liquid will go left and right symetry !

I think around 10 people have told you aren't even eligible for the Nobel prize this will be about the 3rd time I have and Paul pointed it out above, but you aren't a stupid at all are you .... now go take you meds like the men in white coats tell you

You can't even convince the crazies like Prof Andy and Paul what chance do you think you have with actually intelligent people ... few more years to go lets see how you hang in there.

ORAC, PAUL below three mass experiment

http://youtu.be/FgsJrimgPiQ




In above Ytube You can see two experiments

exp.1
4 : 24 ( four minutes and 24 sec. )
three the same mass M

..............EARTH
MV---> {pipe - three way } ---> MV
...............M

exp.2
7:55 -- small mass m

..............EARTH
MV---> {pipe - three way } ---> MV1 !!!
...............m

m<<<M
******************************************


exp. no 2

DID YOU SAW --- V1 !? V1 <<< V

WHAT IS MORE IMPORTANT ??? MV or ENERGY !

NEWTON = SIR - people like Me or Lagiewka = not reach person who step by step working ...





INVERSE SQUARE LAW = SECRET RULES FOR ABOVE PIPE
and MY BOAT and GENERAL IN ALL SECRETS NEW PHYSICS
in 2012 I made in home MICHELSON MORLEY but Inverse Square Law
wersion !!!


I wrote 4 principels it is future for physics
http://marosz-physics.blogspot.com/

YOU CAN USE MY MODEL AND START REBUILD YOUR KNOLEDGE ABOUT ATOMS and BINDING !!!

WE DON't KNOW NOTHING RIGHT NOW

I WROTE mail to Dr ILUK ( in 2010 --2011 ) I described very similar experiment to MR Lagiewka

ILUK told me that I'm Idiot


three way pipe it is special example small radius and pipe

( Newton = past , Einstein supported his theory by fiction )
physics right now = zero true ! only fiction

ORAC CALL TO MIT or LIGO OR ANY UNIVERSITET AND SHOW THEM TRUE

YOU WILL SEE HOW PEOPLE ARE OPEN FOR GOOD EXPERIMENT

THREE MASS few DESK VS 400 years HISTORY in physics

WHAT IS FOR YOU QUANTUM ? - for me speculation
HIGS ??? HIGS ??? no ... physics is more simple !!!
CERN ??? LIGO ??? many people who are not awarness what they are doing !!!


very cheap test ( camera --- Balb ---> 30 km/s )

KOPERNIK stoped SUN
MAROSZ space and TIME





My first pictures
( brightness - photoshop 10 histogram) west ( -30km/s ) and East (+30 km/s )

> http://youtu.be/O9k-zidfJZg


( I WROTE 4 principels .. it is not the end but first very important step for next step ... ORAC ALL WHAT YOU SEE IN BOOKS = FALSE !!! not EXIST SYMETRY !!!

MACH was great Engineer - Einstein = great manipulation and false

I IMPROVED GALILEO NATURAL FALL DOWN LAW

http://tesla4.blogspot.com/

there will be no difference in the air pressures in tank1 and tank 2 and the system will equalize.

you need 4 air tanks , two in front and two in back.

you also need to isolate the front from the back or the
tanks will equalize pressures.

you will need two sets of center pushing pistons that apply the
force to the green fluid.

also your pictures are so tiny that I have to zoom to 400% in order to understand them.

I will not click on your video links because they are stored
on a known / documented / advertised virus prone or infested
web site.

you need to get a you tube account for your videos if you want me to look at them.

STOP PAUL YOU ARE WRECKING MY BUSINESS IT IS A GREAT THEORY

Here is my latest school bus design all you need is to pump water around



It's such a good theory I really love it.

I also fully support the idea that energy and fuel is just a way to keep the poor under control

Those dastardly clever rich people .. weird part I come from a poorer country than poor Marosz.

Below Oryginal MR Lucjan Lagiewka Experiment

http://youtu.be/FgsJrimgPiQ

exp.1

4 : 24 ( four minutes and 24 sec. )
three the same mass M

..............EARTH
MV---> {pipe - three way } ---> MV
...............M

exp.2
7:55 -- small mass m

..............EARTH
MV---> {pipe - three way } ---> MV1 !!!
...............m

m<<<M
******************************************

Paul You have right
4 tanks and 4 different and full variable preasure ( during person is pushing piston e .
( single tank is big ===> level of liquid is close to constant during person is pushing )



01 of May 2014
first test in Home

My turbine move up green bucket.
I'm using 12V pomp from automotive
( glass cleaner pomp in your car 10 USD and two different diameters pipe ( 6 mm and 8 mm ) )



EN http://youtu.be/yI5xD5d0mmw
PL http://youtu.be/5FVBddDUAiM

How big radial forces we have inside small and big pipe ? please tak pencil in Your hand and write equations from secoundary school !!!







I'm very open for Cooperation with CAMBRIDGE
DEAR CAMBRIDGE TEAM befor "next SMITH" will statr copy my idea
please contact with me ---> author is always person who can improve own tool - MR SMITH we speak about new physics You even don't know what You did - Mr Lagiewka made first test in 1980 or more early

INVERSE SQUARE LAW it is very good old physics

pipe d and 2d and we have 4x biger radial forces
pipe d and 3d and we have 9x biger radial forces


In 2012 in Poland I made Michelson Morley but Inverse Square Law version Please ask about below picture any Astronomer that You respect !!!




Doppler it is very natural problem Bulb in the universe
look like below picture is showing ( there is no C+ Vearth )



INVERSE SQUARE LAW


More far from place where signal started = lower intensity of signal
( "lower brightness" )
1R = X , 2R = X/4 , 3R = X/9
X- brightness, R- radius
the same energy portion but different area

there is no any Einstein False exist only different intensity
and absolute constant motion



Above test must be repeat in LIGO :
http://www.scienceagogo.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=51368#Post51368

ORAC ORAC

Light for distance Y+ need time t
during this time camera is moving and Earth is moving



How works camera ? (VERY OLD GREECE )

ok , you almost have it.

you need 2 of the (e) items.

so that you will have 4 pistons in the center.

ie...

ea,eb,ec,ed

ea and eb cannot be allowed to apply pressure on each other.

likewise

ec and ed cannot be allowed to apply pressure on each other.

because the pressure in tanks (B) and (D) will be higher than the pressure in tanks (C) and (A) and this higher pressure
will equalize with the tanks (A) and (C) and when these tanks equalize then you will no longer have the ability to have exact fluid velocity of water and mercury.

there must be a partition between ea and eb in the picture.

there must be a partition between ec and ed in the picture.

like this

tank A <------eb | ea------> tank B
tank C <------ed | ec------> tank D

you will have 4 hydraulic systems that are independent
of each other yet are controlled by a central pressure
apparatus ( the 4 pistons in the center ).

draw another picture with the changes above and post it.

Can I offer a name for the boat HMS Titanic.

You guys have to build it ... please do it.

I have to ask do you mind if I condense all this material to show how brilliant this is to other scientists, I feel such brilliance should be given a forum?

Now please don't let me interrupt I want to see the final design and can we get numbers on sort of weights and sizes to speed of HMS titanic?

I think your out of your league here orac , this type of
thing requires actual math and reality.

and those two things are not the type of things that you understand.

and why would we have to build anything?

To show your true genius, and you are right I don't understand your version of maths or reality

I mean do you believe it will work or not?

As they say put up or shut up ... the result will be funny I assure you

I think the mercury is a bit dangerous probably go for a mud slurry you just need a specific gravity weight differential right?

thats why I said your out of your league.

as soon as newton draws the new picture we can then
put the math up.

not that math means anything to you unless it incorporates
the speed of light

in which case the math would be fake math which you by
association must understand because it too is fake.

and unlike you I think that mercury was a good choice for this
due to its low viscosity and if he uses glass as the hydraulic pipes the surface tension between the mercury and glass will be negligible.

Ah so this is like GOD I just have to believe you he exists. The fact you are a complete religious whackjob who thinks science ate baby Jesus and is out to extract some revenge on science we should discount and ignore as not relevant.

Perhaps you should go and pray I mean the all powerful GOD should be able to knock over pathetic weak science or is that why you don't want to put it to the test its an epic blockbuster ... SCIENCE versus PAUL'S GOD ... NEWS AT 7.

Sorry I am going to bait the hell out of you because you really need to do the experiment there is a lesson in it for you.

Not sure you are going to convince to many with your argument, but hey don't let me distract you two geniuses this is pure gold you do all the maths you like with Marosz I will watch the result of your great claims