Science a GoGo's Home Page Forums General Discussion General Science Discussion Forum Unifying theory of matter solves many puzzles

-What makes a any theory good?

1 Unifies prevailing yet presently incompatable theories, instead of adding one more incompatable theory.

2 Applies the smallest change to get the largest results.

3 Disprobable. A theory is useless if it cannot be disproven.[If I say the Universe dissapears every other second, and returns with no visible evidence, that would not be disprovable]

4 No reliance on major errors in observation or accepted theory.

5 No reliance on new forms of energy or matter.

6 No reliance on phenomenon unobserved and unneccesary by proven theory.

7 No reliance on paradoxical phenomenon. [for example: multiple universes, space surrounding the big bang "that doesn't exist", travelling in a straight line to end up where you started, or matter/energy creation from nothing]

8 No reliance on the creation of adjustable parameters.

Please see my theory:

http://higgs-gluon.com/

Congratulations.
Thats a nice well written theory.

The icing on the cake for you would be for the as yet undiscovered, Higgs Bosun to be detected and proven.
Although I suspect with the collosal energy required to display the Higgs, they would instantly disappear into the mini-black hole that was formed as a result.

Theory is a self-consistent mathematical model constrained by observation. Good theory is predictive, inclusive, and free of falsification. Theory written in the most natural way (often by greater abstraction, e.g. gauging) contrasts with theory reduced to the most elementary concepts.

Lightspeed, c, enforces maximum information transfer rate. Newton's constant, Big G, scales gravitation. Planck's constant, h, enforces uncertainty in measurement; h-bar is the fundamental unit of action. Taken together they define all of physics.

What you have,

"Space is filled with Higg's Boson, primordial particles, which individually are too small to detect."

is contrary to observation and absent all math. It is crap.

Mr. Peabody wrote:
"Recent experiments have created Electrons [Leptons] by pair production"

Anyone with even the remotest contact with serious science would know that statements such as this, without reference to a peer reviewed journal, are meaningless.

You don't have a theory ... you have a conclusion.

There are billions and billions of light-years separating the two.

Thank you, Mike kremer

The icing on the cake for you would be for the as yet undiscovered, Higgs Bosun to be detected and proven.

I believe It is detected, as Gluon. I believe it is inferred in dark matter and ionization of space.
It is observed in surface tension, and the behavior of crystals and the electronic state.

Pair production, the stretching and increase in mass of gluon resulting in the formation of two new quarks or leptons, has been observed ad nauseum in colliders. The prevailing theory is that particles recieve mass from Higgs. This practically describes my model.


statements such as this, without reference to a peer reviewed journal, are meaningless.

I apologize that I didn't keep up with my references as I developed my theory. I plan to go back and get them at some point, as well as provide anchors to definitions for the underlined words.

I expected this response.

Quoted by me:
Recent experiments have created Electrons [Leptons] by pair production"

Response:
Anyone with even the remotest contact with serious science would know that statements such as this, without reference to a peer reviewed journal, are meaningless.

I searched "lepton pair production" and got 6452 results. Here is the first one:

http://flux.aps.org/meetings/YR97/BAPSAPR97/abs/S1560008.html

I am well aware of the work ... the issue I was bringing up is that your web site apparently isn't and thus not written by someone intending for it to be taken seriously by any but the most ill informed.

QUOTED DA MORGAN:
to be taken seriously by any but the most ill informed.

You are the ill-informed one here.

You didn't know leptons were formed in pair production.

What didn't I know? What do people who read my theory not know?

"Anyone with even the remotest contact with serious science would know" that leptons have been created in pair pruduction by colliders for years.


QUOTED DA MORGAN:
your web site apparently isn't and thus not written by someone

I did my own HTML. That's what you call a web page.