Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online Now
0 members (), 628 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Top Posters(30 Days)
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
N
newton Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
N
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
WHY BELOW POST IS ABOVE HIGGS ? is more important than Higgs party version ?

We can always be sure that if there is a party and exist people who are on party always exist questions:

how They dance = how are they moving ?
Where they were in past?
Where they are right now ...
How we feel that they are in party or they joust back to home .
If they dance very fast we can not see them but we can feel that they run very fast near our own position ...we feel vodca in breath but we not see them ?



To Understand below model of party please study

Inverted Square Law ( old greece )
1730 J bradley
1842 Doppler
1930 Tolman brightness test

VERY IMPORTANT INFO not EXIST C+ Vsource
VERY IMPORTANT INFO everything is moving
VERY IMPORTANT INFOR You NEVER SEE and FELL real fresh
position masses around You

APPARENT POSITION = some mass was there in past after many years You feel old posiition other mass

Each mass Has got own local apparent points

I was in point 1 ....I'm in point 2 ...I will be in point 3
it is real and only one true motion definition

http://youtu.be/hLkk0MxjI54

Y tube about HIGGS party ( people from party not EXIST or exist they are apparent points in my model ? )
Very important question is how many people dance and how they are moving ?

http://www.hep.ucl.ac.uk/~djm/higgsa.html


In my movie I explained gravitation mass definition
exist also Inertia mass propblem

Inertia mass = kinetic Eanergy

Inertia mass zero = that body not has got local apparent points
it is stationary body

Gravitatin mass can be zero then Inertia mass is very huge

Perpedicular to motion = neutral direction
( people who like AIKIDO know very good above rule )

in my yTube I expleined gravitation mass m ( it is about -like mass m cooperate with the universe )

below picture I showing Inertia problem how to recognize own motion ( if You push mass m on Your table You will be able recognize problem - finger feel lower or more higher resistance it is inertia)






http://old-physics.blogspot.com/

Last edited by newton; 11/23/13 03:53 PM.
.
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
N
newton Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
N
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,209
DEAR NOBEL PRIZE COMMISION please stop give NOBEL's Prize to people who only like mathematica - and have nice marketing ( party animation )

My above post also can be very easy describe by other person who like mathematica/My model of party made a lot of more greate people than - 18 000 unknowed authors in CERN . Who is real author ?
Please start GIVE PRIZE TO PEOPLE WHO ARE ABLE USE KNOWLEDGE IN REAL LIVE ( Please show me machine that is using Your idea this machine must help people and be real !!!)" it is not my voice but Mr NOBEL opinion.
Please respect Mr Nobel opinion or similar to me people will step by step destroy this what people without imagination call "true" without understand why it is "true".

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,570
B
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
B
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,570
Come back Pre, all is forgiven!


There never was nothing.
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
O
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
Haha very true.

I was thinking he was a troll but he appears to actually believe this junk.

I will show you why he hates mathematics it is actually very funny make sure you enlarge each of the images and read them ... trust me it's worth it laugh

http://maroszmaciej.blogspot.com.au/

I really loved the comment
Quote:

Today 17/06 I spoke with a professore. He didn't want to believe that we can easily estimate that: point 1 eliminates, point 2


The poor prof must just about have died when he saw this smile

He really can't understand the problem you just reduce mathematics down the same way he does physics ignoring any error along the way that doesn't agree with your proposed answer and drawings.

He treats mathematics exactly the same way he treats physics and he just ignores everyone pointing out the errors smile

So you can't use physics or mathematics to show his error because he just makes up his own ... hence it's best just to run away laugh

Last edited by Orac; 11/25/13 03:55 AM.

I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.

Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact UsokÂþ»­¾W
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5