Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online
0 registered (), 224 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Is there anybody out there?
by paul
Today at 03:58 AM
Top Posters (30 Days)
True 1
paul 1
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3
Topic Options
#50035 - 10/11/13 07:19 PM Re: What to do to get NOBEL prize for amatore test ? [Re: Orac]
newton Offline
Megastar

Registered: 09/30/12
Posts: 1209
DRIFT ROTTION

EARTH's own omega in PPoland 1,8 km/s
15 % for 30 km/s is true
for 1/8 km/s I can not measure so small brightness problem


Earth's angle to ellipse around sun = 66.66 degrees

When I made test inside air ( one year ago ) I move up camera on the special table 24 degree
the brighntnees of picture was and is and will be proportional to angle

66.66 degrees and ideal flore leve = that camera has got 24 degree angle to 30 km/s

I move up camera near 24:00

camera ( 24:00 ) Poland
i
i
i
i
i
ERARTH's CENTER -----> 30 km/s

66.66 angle and erth self rotation = that my camera measure many angle to 30 km/s in all 3d direction



DEAR ORAC MY ARGUMENT IS VERY GOOD
SELF ROTATION = rotation but radius is very big
the same 220 km/s

very nice test = ideal perpendicular aberration


The Rocket has got two arms at the end of each arm we have source of signal (source is sending electromagnetic waves - for example Edison's Bulb )




I'm waiting to see #3D image ( velocity image of the earth in micro world below single athom )
Thea same athome we shoud measure in all 3d dirction microscope WE WILL SEE 3d ELLIPSE




below picture explain "theoretical example system for rocket"
two cameras measure rotation ( omega)
one camera can measure line velocity



DEAR ORAC MY SYSTEM CAN SHOW LINE VELOCITY
EACH LINE VELOCITY CAN EXPLAIN EACH OMEGA ( we must know only radius )


Edited by newton (10/11/13 07:20 PM)

Top
.
#50036 - 10/11/13 07:28 PM Re: What to do to get NOBEL prize for amatore test ? [Re: newton]
newton Offline
Megastar

Registered: 09/30/12
Posts: 1209

THEORY FOR MY TEST IN HOME ?



link t above picture
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-KI2cl357Lyk/UgeORFNsAFI/AAAAAAAABHo/xRsMVPkcRBY/s1600/CIMG2579.JPG

NOT EXIST C+ V earth
LIGHT STARTED IN APPARENT POINT
SENSOR ALWAYS SHOWING ABBERATION IF EARTH AND BULB ARE MOVING

Top
#50037 - 10/12/13 03:20 AM Re: What to do to get NOBEL prize for amatore test ? [Re: newton]
Orac Offline
Megastar

Registered: 05/20/11
Posts: 2819
Loc: Currently Illinois, USA
Wow you really answered the questions didn't you laugh

So I take it you accept the idea is falsified .. that makes what 8 false tests to your theory ... science doesn't allow one.

So you theory is dead and buried to science smile

Oh look new pictures ... like why would I bother even discussing more garbage, 8 is enough I think.

Bye lunatic.


Edited by Orac (10/12/13 03:34 AM)
_________________________
I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.

Top
#50038 - 10/12/13 04:10 PM Re: What to do to get NOBEL prize for amatore test ? [Re: newton]
newton Offline
Megastar

Registered: 09/30/12
Posts: 1209
LUNATIC

below animation = fact ? ( Orac it is fact for You ? physics books please study )

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Aberrationlighttimebeaming.gif


What it is apparent point ? Is that point moving with the source or it is stationary point ?

Blue arrow represent one single radial 3D ball wave
( below picture = fact for You or mistake ? )

Beam's shape ( not exist source of light that is sending ideal one line beam )



Point source S is radiating light equally in all directions. The amount passing through an area A varies with the distance of the surface from the light.


WE ALL KNOW THAT EINSTEN TOLD THAT WE CAN NOT RECOGNIZE WE ARE MOVING OR THE SOURCE IS MOVING

What if we will have full information about the source
( electric power + light power + real colour of light )
Person with very good camera can read Apparent distance he can see new position each waves



between bulb and rocket exist distance Y during ligh from bulb is going to touch the rocket's wall ( sensor )

Rocket is moving or not moving ?




We have two type of aberration ( perpendicular ) and parallel

Light signal that SUN started 6 minutes ago we see on the Earth ( What Earth and Sun Are doinng durning these 6 minutes

below winter distance what will be after 6 months




Can we measure above efect in home
Yes good photographer can simulate any distance it is only few sets on camera or dark filtre




WHAT I LEARNED FROM ORAC

MEDIUM RESISTANCE ???

light ---> medium ( air ) -----> 30 km/s <----Light

In my test air ( or water can give not the same resistance for light - absolute medium's motion is important ) ( air is moving with Earth 30 km/s and can block the light


Inside vacuum I already showed solar system WE CAN IGNORE STUPID PERSON but not many years of photography and very simple test

First Michelson Morley tool was also not perfect it is very natural for NEW tools - My tool use light and Is able explain West -East direction ( special astronomy time is important -that is not Deviation from zero for water I see 15% different volume of brightness )

I wait for people who will help test my tool we wil create alternative for All what is right now inside books ( it will be revolution )

Thank You
Maciej Marosz
Engineer and Inventor
http://tesla4.blogspot.com/

Top
#50146 - 10/27/13 12:36 PM Re: What to do to get NOBEL prize for amatore test ? [Re: newton]
newton Offline
Megastar

Registered: 09/30/12
Posts: 1209
Doppler we can measure Red/Blue and !!! Intensity shift !!!

http://youtu.be/fT-D-J2HmDs

more simple explain
http://youtu.be/PNYiejnl0t0

Perpendicular test version
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VY625g-0Qd8

Gravitation and apparent distance problem !!!
http://youtu.be/DUW3zDAUksc

Top
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3



Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor
Facebook

We're on Facebook
Join Our Group

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact Us
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.