Science a GoGo's Home Page Forums General Discussion Not-Quite-Science Forum 23 Exective Oreders concerning gun laws

Im sorry but I cant see where the hype has grounds
for acceptance in main stream conspiracy.

here are the supposed "23 Executive Orders?".

http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/20...-the-president/

and here is a list and archive of actual Executive Orders , try to find something that even relates to gun control.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/executive-orders?page=1

does anyone know where I might find some instance of
gun control laws that have been put into force since
President Obama was elected in 2008?

anything?

I can't say that I know of any gun CONTROL laws, but here in Oklahoma the legislature passed an open carry law. Now any adult with a permit can carry a gun, either concealed or in a holster on their belt. To get a permit you have to take a special course and get a background check.

I think there was some small town that passed a law requiring that every household have a gun. But I just saw another news story that it had been rescinded.

Bill Gill

Its like the laws concerning guns are becoming more lenient
than strict.

the only real changes are in the background checks , which is
not a bad idea.

Im not certain why someones doctor would have a need to
ask if you have any guns in your home , but with the prices
they charge , I can understand how a doctor might find that
information helpful , I only have 5 carrier groups complete
with air wings.

but I dont go to the doctors, so nobody knows about that stuff.

I guess that the reason that there are limits on magazine
capacities is to give the opfor a fighting chance since they
would be outnumbered by a ratio of 1000 to 1 in most cities.

I personally want one of the backpack magazines that hold
a case of ammunition and auto feed the ammo to my 2 arm mounted mini guns.



plus , I just noticed that I misspelt words in the tittle
of this thread so Im correcting that now.

I don't have any guns, and don't really feel any great need to have one. I can't think of any really practical reason to have a 30 round clip in a rifle. But it is really neat! Just think of being able to go hunting without having to carry a load of ammunition. You can just load your rifle in the morning and shoot all day.

Some people may not think of being neat as a reason to have a big magazine, but after all there are a lot of people that load their cell phones up with apps that they don't need, bur are neat. So why not gun owners?

Bill Gill

I agree that a 30 rnd magazine is neat , but check this
out , talk about adding apps.



anyway the main issue with the establishment regulating guns
and ammo is that they are telling the Citizens that they want
to infringe on the Citizens ability to defend the Constitution.

thats what its always been about , someone started the hunting
bit , but its never been about hunting.

its always been about the Constitution.

something I find funny is the new Military training manuals
define someone who is a extremist as being someone who would
deny people of their civil rights.

or someone who would recruit someone into a group that would
deny people of their civil rights.

isnt that what the Military has been training to do?

and doesnt the Military recruit its members into its group?

so the Military manuals define the Military as being an extremist group.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/2161-docs.pdf

its a big document , try finding the word (extremist)with your browser , I get 96 instances of the word in the document.

under A. Definitions







etc...

so if someone is a member of the U.S. Military and he receives
an order to take a weapon away from a citizen for the sole purpose of depriving the Citizen from having the ability to
defend the Constitution in the absence of declared martial law
then the issuing officer and the entire chain of command above that officer who passed the order down to him should be placed under arrest to prevent further violations of DOD 1325.6

under a declaration of martial law the citizens civil rights are withdrawn.