Do you have your answer now paul?
I had my answer before I read it anywhere or heard it anywhere.
logic answers my questions.
it wasnt like I didnt already know the answer , and you certainly dindt answer the question I asked.
I was only trying to find out why you posted what you posted.
Implying there is a 'center', in an 'ever expanding' anything. Too many "What if...?" speculations in your theory.
Your own argument unraveled itself before it started... like it was faster than the speed of...
Science is not wrong, it's just waiting to be proven otherwise. Burden of proof is upon you.
if an object close to or approaching the periphery of our universe is seen as traveling faster than the speed of
light the explanation given is that the object is
not really traveling faster than the speed of light , it only
appears as if it is traveling faster than the speed of light because the space around the object is expanding at a rate
that is faster than the speed of light which causes the object to appear like it is traveling faster than the speed of light.
my thoughts on this.
the method or means of propulsion has nothing to do with
the common science claim that nothing ( no thing ) can travel
as fast or faster than the speed of light.
it does not matter how the object has achieved its faster than light speed , its speed is the only thing in question and that question is , if an object can travel as fast or faster than the speed of light.
clearly an observer at the center of our universe can measure the faster than light object as traveling faster than the speed of light as the object moves outward away from the center of the universe.
science is wrong about the falsely claimed claims it has inserted into the minds of its students and continues to insert those falsities.
and I was right...