Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online Now
0 members (), 388 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Top Posters(30 Days)
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 104
N
Senior Member
Offline
Senior Member
N
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 104
Just to add on: Distance can increase faster than light... but distance has no standing mass. Interesting stuff.

Do you have your answer now paul?


Laziness breeds innovation
.
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,136
P
paul Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
P
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,136
Quote:
it is still possible for the distances between faraway galaxies to increase faster than the speed of light, due to the rate at which the space between them is stretching.


space is not expanding like science wants you to believe , they
use that additional lie because of the original lie that they
used " nothing can travel faster than light ".

thats all that is.

if that were truly the case then all stars in all the
galaxies , would be expanding away from the center of
their respective galaxy.

also all the planets in all the solar systems would be expanding away from their respective sun.

because there is space in between everything in the universe.

thats the way physics works , even if science wants you
to believe even more lies so that they wont loose face.











3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,136
P
paul Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
P
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,136
Quote:
Do you have your answer now paul?


I had my answer before I read it anywhere or heard it anywhere.

logic answers my questions.

it wasnt like I didnt already know the answer , and you certainly dindt answer the question I asked.

I was only trying to find out why you posted what you posted.

Quote:
Implying there is a 'center', in an 'ever expanding' anything. Too many "What if...?" speculations in your theory.

Your own argument unraveled itself before it started... like it was faster than the speed of...

Science is not wrong, it's just waiting to be proven otherwise. Burden of proof is upon you.


if an object close to or approaching the periphery of our universe is seen as traveling faster than the speed of
light the explanation given is that the object is
not really traveling faster than the speed of light , it only
appears as if it is traveling faster than the speed of light because the space around the object is expanding at a rate
that is faster than the speed of light which causes the object to appear like it is traveling faster than the speed of light.

my thoughts on this.

the method or means of propulsion has nothing to do with
the common science claim that nothing ( no thing ) can travel
as fast or faster than the speed of light.


it does not matter how the object has achieved its faster than light speed , its speed is the only thing in question and that question is , if an object can travel as fast or faster than the speed of light.

clearly an observer at the center of our universe can measure the faster than light object as traveling faster than the speed of light as the object moves outward away from the center of the universe.

science is wrong about the falsely claimed claims it has inserted into the minds of its students and continues to insert those falsities.

and I was right...


3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 104
N
Senior Member
Offline
Senior Member
N
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 104
paul, are you, by any chance, affiliated with Westboro Baptist Church?

I ask out of curiosity. You just seem like the type.

Also, your post makes little to no sense. I'll let you read over this thread again and figure out why. The answers are there, and just a hint; they aren't in your posts. Good luck buddy.


Laziness breeds innovation
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,136
P
paul Offline OP
Megastar
OP Offline
Megastar
P
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,136
Quote:
Just to add on: Distance can increase faster than light... but distance has no standing mass. Interesting stuff.

Do you have your answer now paul?


yes that pretty much sums it up , thank you my friend.

this should be interesting to you also , not that it has any value either.

light can increase faster than distance...but light has no standing mass.

I have truly enjoyed our little conservation neohappy but
we have reached the pinacle and I see no further horizons
for us to pursue.

Im jumping off now , have fun.


3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact UsokÂþ»­¾W
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5