Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use. So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.
are you saying that the wheel in question can not be fully explained under current scientific laws?
is science really that weak?
my gosh , science is deeply involved in allowing things to just pop in and out of existence , and those things can pop in and out of any universe they choose , why is this simple machine causing such an uproar?
think about the ball as being a car.
and the magnet as being a wench.
if you connect the wench to the car and pull the car towards the wench then naturally the wheel will begin to turn as the wench pull's on the car.
when the car reaches a certain height the wench slips and some of the cable feeds out , this causes the car to fall slightly , then the wench begins to pull the car again. this repeats every time the car reaches a certain height.
all the while the wheel keeps turning.
that's a pretty simple explanation , that only requires a sagg level of thought process.
this might be how it works.
the magnet pulls on the ball , the ball rolls toward the magnet , the wheel turns.
as the wheel speed's up the wheel is constantly pushing against the ball causing the ball to fall and the magnet lift's the ball back up to its former position.
also the bars that are passing above the ball directly further in from the ball may be providing compressed air that pushes against the ball.
in the video the magnet is rocking the ball back and forth which tells me that when the magnet picks the ball up the ball travels a little further than the point that the magnet can hold it at , so the ball drops due to
gravity, friction from the turning wheel, air pressure and an eddy current ( as described below ).
and it could be that the metal bars ( if aluminum or copper ) are causing a scientifically explainable force to be placed on the ball as the bars pass the ball as shown in the above eddy current video's.
but since you cant comprehend it , because you have been taught that it can't work then you deny it.
how scientific is that?
how do we know that the ball is solid steel / iron?
it could have an copper or aluminum core that provides for an eddy current...
just saying something wont work is not scientific.
3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.
I think you might have a mis-spelled word. Is "winch" what you are looking for when you wrote "wench". Because a "wench" is a girl with loose morals. Or did you mean to say "wrench"? I'm a bit confused.
If you don't care for reality, just wait a while; another will be along shortly. --A Rose
I do know, it wouldn't be perpetual, and it wouldn't be 'free energy'.
no you dont.
and BTW what are you hosers doing to your wildlife up there to make them want to hang around down here so long , there getting so thick , we have to thin them out.
3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.
You used the wrong 'there' again Paul. For someone who can make perpetual motion, you should have this by now. I know I'm nitpicking, but it is very hard to read your posts with the spelling errors and lack of proper punctuation.
"don't" notice the little thinger between the n and the t? Use it manno, proper writing will be a cornerstone to getting your perpetual motion papers recognized by the 'science cultists'. I'm only trying to help. Proper trolling starts with proper use of the language one is trolling in. Unless, of course, you are trolling a forum that specializes in said language. Then, by all means, troll away.
I do know, it wouldn't be perpetual, and it wouldn't be 'free energy'.
no you dont.
and BTW what are you hosers doing to your wildlife up there to make them want to hang around down here so long , there getting so thick , we have to thin them out.