You surprise me, Paul. Even without QM, this doesn’t work. Time dilation???
When two observers are in relative uniform motion and uninfluenced by any gravitational mass, the point of view of each will be that the other's (moving) clock is ticking at a slower rate than the local clock. The faster the relative velocity, the greater the magnitude of time dilation. This case is sometimes called special relativistic time dilation.
For instance, two rocket ships (A and B) speeding past one another in space would experience time dilation. If they somehow had a clear view into each others' ships, each crew would see the others' clocks and movement as going too slowly. That is, inside the frame of reference of Ship A, everything is moving normally, but everything over on Ship B appears to be moving slower (and vice versa).
I suppose the pictured
moving clock consist of atoms , some of
which have an electron that is traveling in the direction
of clock motion
therefore , logic dictates that
clock speed .87c + electron speed .9c = >c
sorry , time dilation only slows time as measured by two observers , not electrons ...LOL
if the observer is outside the spaceship
and he can see the surface spin of the electron as the spacship passes in front of him.
and he takes a measurement of the surface speed of the electron as the electron is traveling in the direction of spaceship motion.
the speed of the surface of the electron would be that
of the speed of the atom + the speed of the orbit of the electron + the speed of the surface of the electron as it spins.
.9c + .9c + electron surface speed = >c
next
if the observer is inside the spaceship
and he takes a measurement of the surface speed of the electron as the electron is traveling in the direction of spaceship motion.
the speed of the surface of the electron would be that
of the speed of the atom
( .9c he looks at the spaceships speedometer)+ the speed of the orbit of the electron + the speed of the surface of the electron as it spins.
.9c + .9c + electron surface speed = >c
PS
I'm ignoring orac , hes getting upset again.
its nice to know that there are people in physics that
use logic along with physics such as socratus in the discussion.
A quick glance over the notes I have been keeping for a few years reveals instances where I have suggested that science is inclined to invent things to explain the unexplainable. However, as long as everyone realises that these inventions are only ideas, until experiments prove (OK, I know you can’t really prove anything) or disprove them, this seems to be a reasonable form of progress.
thats just it , the dream has stop sign's in it.
take the stop sign's and speed limits down and then you can progress.
setting or determining speeds is fine , but setting speed limits is wrong as described above.
setting limits is wrong.
speed limits should only be set after ( PROPER ) verification has been performed , however you will never find any real speed limits.
this is pretty clear...
if you believe that ( NOTHING ) can travel faster than the speed of light , then nothing , not even an atom could move at all according to your belief system.
because electrons travel at or near ( in the vicinity <=> ) the speed of light.
not counting the surface speed of the electron.
every time I type on this keyboard part's of me and the keyboard are moving faster than the speed of light!!!
then there's the speed of the spin of the earth
the speed of the earth as it orbits the sun
the speed of the solar systems orbit in the galaxy
the speed that the galaxy is moving inside this universe
the speed that this universe is moving inside the cosmos.