Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online Now
0 members (), 388 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Top Posters(30 Days)
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 55
G
gan Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
G
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 55
In Malaysia, Maths and Science will be taught in Malay! What the .... I am fainted.

.
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
O
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
I am guessing that is to make it more accessible to children at school ... am I right in assuming not all children are taught english?

If so this is a very good thing Gan.


I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 55
G
gan Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
G
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 55
It is accessible for the Malays! Malaysia is a multi-race country. It's not fair for us!!!

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
O
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
WOW sorry I don't know the background of malaysia.

There are alot of science available on the internet through school extension programs.

It's a bit of a landmine trying to google it, I can try and find you reasonable options through proper channels if it helps.


I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,940
T
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
T
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,940
I guess they want to preserve traditional language and culture.
Might be better for them economically to use English or Chinese for those classes.

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,840
R
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
R
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,840
Malaysia is far from even handed in the governance of it's Malay and non-Malay populations. If you happen to be born a "son of the soil" i.e. Muslim Malay, then lucky you. If you happen to be of Chinese ethnicity, then you'll be facing a heavy burden of unequal rights and legislated deprivation - and that includes education priorities and opportunities. I quite understand Gan's concern.


"Time is what prevents everything from happening at once" - John Wheeler
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
O
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
Even for english the more complex maths and science starts to take on language and meanings that are far outside normal everyday language.

English is a 2nd language to me and I find the more technical a paper or article the easier it is for me to follow because less of the actual general everyday english nuiances trip me up.

I think you will find eventually this issue dissapears or is no worse than a person from english speaking.

So keep up the good work Amit I see you got in the top group on the tutorial.


I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,940
T
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
T
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,940
Originally Posted By: Amit


The definition is incorrect.

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,940
T
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
T
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,940
Originally Posted By: Amit
Thanks for commenting,with respect I want to ask you the exact definition of rational number.


The site says, "Rational numbers are those numbers which can be represented in the form of p/q where p and q are REAL numbers and q cannot be zero."

The rational numbers are those numbers that can be represented as the ratio of two INTEGERS in lowest terms, i.e. no common factors.


http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RationalNumber.html
has a definition that says it's the ratio of integers (and not reals). I think the statement that q ≠ 0 is redundant, since no number is defined that way anyway. The phrase where p and q are in lowest terms is missing from their definition and I think that's a mistake, as the proof that sqrt(2), for example, is irrational relies on that property.

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
O
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
Fallible is quite right the definition is wrong P and Q can only be integers.


I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
O
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
As a physicist not a mathematician I take the 1st amendment on the lowest factor part.

To me 12/16, 6/8 and 3/4 are all isomorphic and as I accept H20, water and hydrogen hydroxide also mean the same thing I have no problem with those fractions representing the same thing.

Mathematically perhaps there are standards that require all simplifications to be done so I leave that up to the experts.


I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.

Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact UsokÂþ»­¾W
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5