0 members (),
388
guests, and
4
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 55
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 55 |
In Malaysia, Maths and Science will be taught in Malay! What the .... I am fainted.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
Megastar
|
Megastar
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819 |
I am guessing that is to make it more accessible to children at school ... am I right in assuming not all children are taught english?
If so this is a very good thing Gan.
I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 55
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 55 |
It is accessible for the Malays! Malaysia is a multi-race country. It's not fair for us!!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
Megastar
|
Megastar
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819 |
WOW sorry I don't know the background of malaysia.
There are alot of science available on the internet through school extension programs.
It's a bit of a landmine trying to google it, I can try and find you reasonable options through proper channels if it helps.
I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,940
Megastar
|
Megastar
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,940 |
I guess they want to preserve traditional language and culture. Might be better for them economically to use English or Chinese for those classes.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,840
Megastar
|
Megastar
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,840 |
Malaysia is far from even handed in the governance of it's Malay and non-Malay populations. If you happen to be born a "son of the soil" i.e. Muslim Malay, then lucky you. If you happen to be of Chinese ethnicity, then you'll be facing a heavy burden of unequal rights and legislated deprivation - and that includes education priorities and opportunities. I quite understand Gan's concern.
"Time is what prevents everything from happening at once" - John Wheeler
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
Megastar
|
Megastar
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819 |
Even for english the more complex maths and science starts to take on language and meanings that are far outside normal everyday language.
English is a 2nd language to me and I find the more technical a paper or article the easier it is for me to follow because less of the actual general everyday english nuiances trip me up.
I think you will find eventually this issue dissapears or is no worse than a person from english speaking.
So keep up the good work Amit I see you got in the top group on the tutorial.
I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,940
Megastar
|
Megastar
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,940 |
The definition is incorrect.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,940
Megastar
|
Megastar
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,940 |
Thanks for commenting,with respect I want to ask you the exact definition of rational number. The site says, "Rational numbers are those numbers which can be represented in the form of p/q where p and q are REAL numbers and q cannot be zero." The rational numbers are those numbers that can be represented as the ratio of two INTEGERS in lowest terms, i.e. no common factors. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RationalNumber.htmlhas a definition that says it's the ratio of integers (and not reals). I think the statement that q ≠ 0 is redundant, since no number is defined that way anyway. The phrase where p and q are in lowest terms is missing from their definition and I think that's a mistake, as the proof that sqrt(2), for example, is irrational relies on that property.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
Megastar
|
Megastar
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819 |
Fallible is quite right the definition is wrong P and Q can only be integers.
I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819
Megastar
|
Megastar
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,819 |
As a physicist not a mathematician I take the 1st amendment on the lowest factor part.
To me 12/16, 6/8 and 3/4 are all isomorphic and as I accept H20, water and hydrogen hydroxide also mean the same thing I have no problem with those fractions representing the same thing.
Mathematically perhaps there are standards that require all simplifications to be done so I leave that up to the experts.
I believe in "Evil, Bad, Ungodly fantasy science and maths", so I am undoubtedly wrong to you.
|
|
|
|
|