Science a GoGo's Home Page Forums General Discussion Physics Forum CERN/OPERA - IKARUS - TSOLKAS

An interesting experiment !

http://www.tsolkas.gr/html/cern-opera-ikarus-en.html


Christos A. Tsolkas

Well, in essence, that experiment has been performed many times, and the 2 pulses will always be found to be separated by less than the pulse transmission time. It is very well understood, because the difference in the timing is generated by the Doppler Effect. This has absolutely nothing to do with relativity.

Bill Gill

RELATIVITY THEORY: END !

http://tsolkas.gr/html/endof.pdf

at www.tsolkas.gr


Christos A. Tsolkas

TO: University Physics Professors
Dear Sirs,
As of today, (January 21, 2009), please stop teaching the Theory of Relativity!
The Theory of Relativity is finished for good!!!

Christos A. Tsolkas
=======.

What is about such interpretation ?

Einstein’s SRT: what is it about?
1.
One of Einstein’s postulate says that particle – quantum of light -
moves in a straight line with constant and independent
speed c=1 .
2.
The other Einstein’s SRT postulate says that movement is
relative conception. The name of Einstein’s article is :
“ On the Electrodynamics of moving Bodies.”
Einstein wrote about moving of ‘Electrodynamics Bodies’ (!)
It means he wrote about particles like quantum of light, electron. (!)
And then this other Einstein’s postulate must be understand as:
‘every speed , even the speed of quantum of light is relative.’
It means that quantum of light can have
two kinds of motions: constant and relative.
3
SRT is theory about relativity of speed,
including the motion of quantum of light. (!)
SRT explains only the behavior of Quantum of Light ( ! )
The essence ( ! ) of Einstein’s SRT is hidden in the question:
What will be happen if the electrodynamics particle – quantum of light –
changes its constant - straight movement ?
=========.
All the best.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus.
==============..
P.S.
Book: Lee Smolin, The Trouble With Physics, p. 226.
"Einstein's special theory of relativity is based on two postulates:
One is the relativity of motion, and the second is the constancy
and universality of the speed of light.
Could the first postulate be true and the other false?
If that was not possible, Einstein would not have had to make two
postulates. But I don't think many people realized until recently
that you could have a consistent theory in which you changed only
the second postulate."
==.

To Christos A. Tsolkas

Perhaps you missed the news Neutrinos don't travel faster than light it was timing error with a fibre optic cable.

http://phys.org/news/2012-06-einstein-neutrino.html

You will also note Gravity Probe B upheld GR as being correct.

So your whole argument is in tatters and as Bill Gill has explained to you this subject is long since closed for science.

Now if you can't accept that you then have to invoke conspiracy or some other lunatic explaination as to why the whole of science has conspired together to accept this result and that would be _______________________________

Feel free to fill in your appropriate nutcase explaination of why every scientist around the world has conspired to make this happen.

Now lets see if you are intelligent and logical and can accept the inevitable and compelling answer or are we the stereotypical pseudoscience whack job.

To Socratus you are showing signs of alzheimer's which is quite common for those around 68. We showed you that all of that is false so you are either suffering memory retaining problems or deliberately lying.

So you either need to see a doctor about your alzheimer's or else see someone about that lying problem.

If you are of the faith the bible has some good discussion on lying

http://www.grace4u.org/Topical/landrum_ss/Lying.htm

An interesting experiment,

http://tsolkas.gr/html/ANNOUNCEMENT_Aug2012.pdf

at www.tsolkas.gr



Christos A. Tsolkas

Attention !

It is essential to conduct the J.P. Cedarholm – Townes experiment (1959) on a moving vehicle relative to the Earth’s surface in order to establish whether the Theory of Relativity is accurate or not.

Otherwise, we will never be able to say with certainty that the Theory of relativity is true, no matter how many experiments are performed and verified.

Conclusion


Consequently, if the J.P. Cedarholm - C.H.Townes experiment (1959) is performed (using an experimental device that is in motion relative to the surface of the Earth) and it yields a POSITIVE result, then the Theory of Relativity (Special and General) is 100% FALSE!!!!

more, at www.tsolkas.gr


Christos A. Tsolkas

I have no idea what your experiment consists of, but there have been many many experiments that show relativity works just fine for any movement in any direction relative to almost any frame of reference. For it to be 100% wrong you are going to have to come up with something more than that.

Trying to argue with success is a hard job. And relativity is one of the more successful theories.

Give it up ABCD, you just aren't going to win.

Bill Gill

Should one be a just little suspicious, perhaps?