Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online
0 registered (), 291 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
welcome to the newly developing glaciation period.
by paul
10/24/19 03:23 PM
Potatoes on Mars
by paul
10/24/19 02:55 PM
Fishing , baiting the hook.
by paul
10/24/19 02:43 PM
F=mv ... mv=F
by paul
10/24/19 02:37 PM
Do we have a moderator?
by paul
10/23/19 12:30 AM
Is there anybody out there?
by paul
10/23/19 12:22 AM
Top Posters (30 Days)
paul 13
Page 16 of 16 < 1 2 ... 14 15 16
Topic Options
#40249 - 09/20/11 03:06 PM Re: fake moon landing [Re: Orac]
Bill Offline
Megastar

Registered: 12/31/10
Posts: 1858
Loc: Oklahoma, USA
Originally Posted By: Orac
It's called ironic statement Preearth (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony) ... somehow I don't think Bill G really believes it ... just a guess by me!


Drat Orac, you saw right through me.

No I don't believe the moon landings were a fake. One of the huge problems with faking the moon landings would have been the huge size of the conspiracy, involving thousands of people from all around the world. There just isn't any way to get that many people involved in the cover up and not have anybody let it out.

Bill Gill
_________________________
C is not the speed of light in a vacuum.
C is the universal speed limit.

Top
.
#40257 - 09/20/11 09:21 PM Re: fake moon landing [Re: Bill]
Bill S. Offline
Megastar

Registered: 08/20/10
Posts: 3570
Loc: Essex, UK
Bill, that's the sort of response I was looking for to my "thought experiment". I suspect it would be impossible to achieve such a task without someone seeing it; conversely, I think it would be impossible to pretend to do it without “sussed out”.
_________________________
There never was nothing.

Top
#43129 - 04/08/12 06:11 PM Re: fake moon landing [Re: RM]
Bill S. Offline
Megastar

Registered: 08/20/10
Posts: 3570
Loc: Essex, UK
Fat Freddy, how's your cat?
_________________________
There never was nothing.

Top
#47017 - 12/23/12 01:31 PM Re: fake moon landing [Re: RM]
Rocky
Unregistered


Look what I just came across.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/conspiracy...#post1061019785

It pretty much looks like the missions were faked.

Top
#47027 - 12/24/12 02:01 AM Re: fake moon landing [Re: ]
Bill S. Offline
Megastar

Registered: 08/20/10
Posts: 3570
Loc: Essex, UK
Welcome to SAGG, Rocky

Recently David Attenborough admitted that some of the animal footage in his series was photographed in captivity to obtain better results. This does not mean that his progs are fakes, or that he has not been to the locations shown.

If you discount all the possible evidence for faked photography, how much is left?


Edited by Bill S. (12/24/12 02:03 AM)
_________________________
There never was nothing.

Top
Page 16 of 16 < 1 2 ... 14 15 16



Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor
Facebook

We're on Facebook
Join Our Group

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact Us
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.