Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online Now
0 members (), 66 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Top Posters(30 Days)
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 16 of 16 1 2 14 15 16
Orac #40249 09/20/11 03:06 PM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,858
B
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
B
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,858
Originally Posted By: Orac
It's called ironic statement Preearth (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony) ... somehow I don't think Bill G really believes it ... just a guess by me!


Drat Orac, you saw right through me.

No I don't believe the moon landings were a fake. One of the huge problems with faking the moon landings would have been the huge size of the conspiracy, involving thousands of people from all around the world. There just isn't any way to get that many people involved in the cover up and not have anybody let it out.

Bill Gill


C is not the speed of light in a vacuum.
C is the universal speed limit.
.
Bill #40257 09/20/11 09:21 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,570
B
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
B
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,570
Bill, that's the sort of response I was looking for to my "thought experiment". I suspect it would be impossible to achieve such a task without someone seeing it; conversely, I think it would be impossible to pretend to do it without “sussed out”.


There never was nothing.
RM #43129 04/08/12 06:11 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,570
B
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
B
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,570
Fat Freddy, how's your cat?


There never was nothing.
RM #47017 12/23/12 01:31 PM
R
Rocky
Unregistered
Rocky
Unregistered
R
Look what I just came across.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/conspiracy...#post1061019785

It pretty much looks like the missions were faked.

#47027 12/24/12 02:01 AM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,570
B
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
B
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,570
Welcome to SAGG, Rocky

Recently David Attenborough admitted that some of the animal footage in his series was photographed in captivity to obtain better results. This does not mean that his progs are fakes, or that he has not been to the locations shown.

If you discount all the possible evidence for faked photography, how much is left?

Last edited by Bill S.; 12/24/12 02:03 AM.

There never was nothing.
Page 16 of 16 1 2 14 15 16

Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact UsokĀž»­¾W
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5