The great republican party has done it again.
When a states people pay taxes to its Federal Government that
Government has certain responsibilities to the tax payers of that state.

however the highly intelligent members of the republican party (LOL) , have decided to allow assistance to the State of Vermont as long as equal reductions are made to the Federal Governments spending.

32.7 percent of the voters in Vermont voted republican in 2008

I would be willing to wager that in 2012 that 32.7% will drop to below 1% given that Vermont has now gotten a first hand dose of representation from the republican party.

perhaps the republican states should begin to repay the government assistance that they recieved in the past and present and that money can be used to lower the government spending.


http://motherjones.com/mojo/2009/04/texa...times-any-state

Quote:
David Riedman, a public information specialist at FEMA, explained to me that a major disaster declaration is issued when a governor "determines the state's resources are overrun." From that point forward, the federal government, under federal law, is required to reimburse the state for at least 75 percent of the cost of recovery. Help is primarily targeted at rebuilding roads and bridges, debris removal, and reparing damage to public buildings. In the relief efforts that are still under way from the damage done by Hurricane Ike, the federal government is reimbursing Texas for 100 percent of all expenses, according to Riedman.

In fact, since FEMA's record-keeping began, Texas has received federal disaster assistance more times than any other state. From FEMA's website:


Federal Law , mandates assistance not some group of anti american politicians.

even though the State that requires assistance is not considered a republican state the Federal Government is not prejudice.

Is it wise to deny emergency assistance to any state knowing that ( rick perry ) your prime candidate for the Presidency of the United States is the governor of the state that has recieved more assistance than any other state in the UNION?

of course by me using the word wise in reference to republicans I may be taking on a tremendous amount of ridicule from those who just know that the words wise and republican do not belong in the same local vicinity.

is there a reason why republicans think that texas is better than Vermont?

should the Federal Government suspend all emergency assistance to texas and all other states that are currently recieving emergency assistance , until that spending has been paid for through government spending reductions.

or should the government follow and uphold the Federal Laws.










3/4 inch of dust build up on the moon in 4.527 billion years,LOL and QM is fantasy science.