Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online Now
0 members (), 619 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Top Posters(30 Days)
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#32866 12/09/09 08:26 AM
J
J. Oroszkowski
Unregistered
J. Oroszkowski
Unregistered
J
Just a thought -

From the perspective of a stationary observer, time dilates as an object moves closer and closer to the speed of light. I know that it's experimentally not possible (at the moment) to surpass the speed of light, but... if an object were to reach the exact speed of light, then would time theoretically stop for that object? And if an object were to be moving faster than the speed of light, then would that object be moving backwards in time? It strikes me as kind of odd that something so abstract to us could be affected by a physical object's speed. Any ideas are welcome!

.
#33330 02/04/10 03:09 AM
D
dogbrain
Unregistered
dogbrain
Unregistered
D
At no moment will anything ever travel faster than C. Predicting what is occurring on a ship approaching C is strictly a mathematical calculation. From the frame of reference of an observer on the ship the rest of the Universe would appear to be moving very fast. Time dilation is relative only to the observers frame of reference (clock). An observer falling into a black hole would see the rest of the Universe speed up.

#33335 02/05/10 01:21 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,840
R
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
R
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,840
It's worth mentioning that things can (and do) travel faster than c relative to each other - they just don't travel though space faster than c.


"Time is what prevents everything from happening at once" - John Wheeler
#33337 02/05/10 05:42 AM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 498
Z
Superstar
Offline
Superstar
Z
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 498
Originally Posted By: J. Oroszkowski
if an object were to reach the exact speed of light, then would time theoretically stop for that object? And if an object were to be moving faster than the speed of light, then would that object be moving backwards in time
This is logical and basically true insight. For photon local time virtualy stops and tachyons are claimed to travel backward in time.

Zephir #33361 02/09/10 11:37 AM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 498
Z
Superstar
Offline
Superstar
Z
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 498
This animation demonstrates it in rather illustrative way: if we consider light speed invariant with respect to observer, then the speed of light spreading for object moving by near luminal speed simply should stop - which could be interpreted like if speed of time would cease to zero.



Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact UsokÂþ»­¾W
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5