Science a GoGo's Home Page Forums General Discussion Climate Change Forum Climate change information sources

"Seven Answers to Climate Contrarian Nonsense"
by John Rennie @ Scientific American. (Author is the previous editor in chief of SciAm.)

November 30, 2009

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=seven-answers-to-climate-contrarian-nonsense

Course on Global Warming from University of Chicago.

"Global Warming: Understanding the Forecast"

http://geoflop.uchicago.edu/forecast/docs/index.html

Site contains video lectures and online interactive computer models.

"Columbia Journalism Review" analyzes news coverage of the hacked emails.

http://www.cjr.org/the_observatory/hacked_emails_and_journalistic.php

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/05/start-here/

"RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists."

What's the hype about "bombshells" ?

http://deepclimate.org/about/

Doing a good job of propping up the creaking edifice TFF.

Just like the moon-hoaxers, creationists, and other science denialists, climate change denialists misunderstand science as a game of "gotcha." It's all about the rhetoric.

Meanwhile, what do the qualified scientists tell us? The ones who aren't ideologically driven like CATO or CEI or paid for by oil interests?

http://www.aaas.org/policy_pos.shtml

You see, at least we have some common point, after all.

Here's a good one.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/


I like this approach. It's necessary. It's sort of a canonical list of refutations of creationist, er, anti-agw rhetoric.

some of these boulders look like they weigh several thousand pounds , but

I thought boulders would sink in water I suppose the idea I subbmitted to the D.O.E. about using turbines in a pipe for thousands of miles on level ground must have been wrong.

because supposedly the turbines would have slowed the flow of the water , unlike these boulders I suppose its because the water just lifts the boulders and carries them with it.

and turning a turbine blade would be too much work for water to do.

theres no doubt about it , were getting plenty of rain water to use the pipe idea now , and not even use a pump at each end.

plenty.