Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online Now
0 members (), 181 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Top Posters(30 Days)
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 47
L
Member
OP Offline
Member
L
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 47
The origin of micro Comets and Ball lightning.
(What goes DOWN sometimes goes UP)
25 years ago during heavy thunderstorm in the Netherlands, a photo camera with automatic shutter recorded strange bead lightning streaks with interesting curvature.
At the end of some streaks a fire ball was visible.
Reconstruction of the curvature of the bead lightning suggested that all the streaks should have some relation to each other and the same frequency.
See: Rigid Gluonium Knots and Ball lightning
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/02/3-d-pictures-in-sky-written-by.html

Could it be, that electromagnetic wave interference (with the same wavelength) was responsible for this phenomenon?
The answer was YES if there was also an x-ray (or Gamma-ray) component into play.
Why do we need this x-ray phenomenon? Because not all lightning strokes produce bead lightning or fireball ball lightning.
There must be some irregular component responsible for the incidental emerging of Ball lightning and Bead lightning.
This component could be found in the recent experiment results of professor J.R.Dwyer, ( Geospace physics lab,FIT). He discovered the x-rays emission from laboratory sparks and lightning strokes.
(see: The observation of x-ray bursts produced by 1.5 MV laboratory sparks in air
http://my.fit.edu/~jdwyer/AGU2005poster.doc )
Recently also M.Rahman (Upsala university Sweden) made comparable experiments: “x-rays from 80 cm long sparks in air” with x-ray emission results, see:
http://www.lightning.ece.ufl.edu/PDF/AGU/Rahman_et_al_2008.pdf

However, if strong electromagnetic radiation and accompanying x-rays are responsible for ball lightning, then perhaps also (larger) ball lightning effects could be found in space at places with high discharge energies like so called SPRITES and ELVES or even near the solar surface by so called BIRKELAND currents.
Judge for yourselves and look at the slow-motion video of Langmuir University of sprites and elves. See under: “Sprites and Elves as the origin of small Comets and large Ball Lightnings”
http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/2009/02/sprites-and-elves-as-origin-of-small.html
What you see is the production of lots of fireballs going down and partly after a while going up again!!! Just like the solar photo presenting at least four fireballs going down and ONE going upwards!! See; “Small Comet production by Solar Birkeland current interference” http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/

Leo Vuyk.

.
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 47
L
Member
OP Offline
Member
L
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 47
Postulate:
All Comets are originated as “Small Comets”, by Birkeland magnetic field interference near to the solar surface as is shown in the photograph. http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/
mentioned before.
All these Comets where able to produce or gather enough water molecules, during their journey away from the sun, to be influenced by the solar gravity field and become an elliptical orbit around the sun.

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 498
Z
Superstar
Offline
Superstar
Z
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 498
OK, how we can falsify such hypothesis?

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 47
L
Member
OP Offline
Member
L
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 47
Falsification could be possible by catching a fireball inside elves and sprites. How ? by flying through the area with metal fishing nets observed by high speed cameras.

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 47
L
Member
OP Offline
Member
L
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 47
A second falsifiation could be, to use the combination of x-ray and electomagnetic interference in a high energy lab of course!


Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact UsokĀž»­¾W
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5