Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online
0 registered (), 207 Guests and 5 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Top Posters (30 Days)
Topic Options
#30848 - 06/06/09 05:49 PM A Brilliant IDEA
ABV Offline
Member

Registered: 06/06/09
Posts: 56
The two words about IDEA.
Letís take 2 rolling abodies on a track a Thin Ring and a Solid Disk, with same mass and velocity.
Are they have a difference? Yes. Kinetic Energy. On these conditions the Thin Ring has more kinetic energy than the Solid Disk has.
Why? Because the rolling bodies full kinetic energy counts moment of inertia. Physics smile Everybody knows.

Letís take a curve part of track. Would those rolling bodies gains different momentum to the track from centripetal force? NO. Because these rolling bodies have same mass and velocity.

Letís take a straight part of track. Inelastic rolling bodies are running without slippery.
Would those rolling bodies gains different momentum to the track from Rolling Resistance?
YES. Because these rolling bodies have a different moments of inertia.
Why? Because, the Rolling Resistance is not a sliding friction. Under own weight the rolling bodies make a little cavity on the track and always hikes to this cavity edge. The rolling bodies are loosing a kinetic energy from that movement, but kinetic energy for the Thin Ring and Solid Disk with same conditions is different.

Therefore, if construct an Isolated System with specific track, which has a curve and straight parts. The Isolated System will get a strange behavior.
From one site, a law of momentums conservation must work.
But from other site, a momentum from a Centripetal Force wonít compensate a momentum from a Rolling Resistance, on the Isolated System with Thin Ring.
Paradox smile
Please take a look.
http://knol.google.com/k/alex-belov/paradox-of-classical-mechanics/1xmqm1l0s4ys/3#

Top
.
#31322 - 07/29/09 12:56 AM Re: A Brilliant IDEA [Re: ABV]
Mike Kremer Offline

Megastar

Registered: 10/16/04
Posts: 1696
Loc: London UK
Originally Posted By: ABV
The two words about IDEA.
Letís take 2 rolling abodies on a track a Thin Ring and a Solid Disk, with same mass and velocity.
Are they have a difference? Yes. Kinetic Energy. On these conditions the Thin Ring has more kinetic energy than the Solid Disk has.
Why? Because the rolling bodies full kinetic energy counts moment of inertia. Physics smile Everybody knows.

Letís take a curve part of track. Would those rolling bodies gains different momentum to the track from centripetal force? NO. Because these rolling bodies have same mass and velocity.

Letís take a straight part of track. Inelastic rolling bodies are running without slippery.
Would those rolling bodies gains different momentum to the track from Rolling Resistance?
YES. Because these rolling bodies have a different moments of inertia.
Why? Because, the Rolling Resistance is not a sliding friction. Under own weight the rolling bodies make a little cavity on the track and always hikes to this cavity edge. The rolling bodies are loosing a kinetic energy from that movement, but kinetic energy for the Thin Ring and Solid Disk with same conditions is different.

Therefore, if construct an Isolated System with specific track, which has a curve and straight parts. The Isolated System will get a strange behavior.
From one site, a law of momentums conservation must work.
But from other site, a momentum from a Centripetal Force wonít compensate a momentum from a Rolling Resistance, on the Isolated System with Thin Ring.
Paradox smile
Please take a look.
http://knol.google.com/k/alex-belov/paradox-of-classical-mechanics/1xmqm1l0s4ys/3#


[quote=Mike Kremer]
I could'nt get your URL to work, This is the nearest one I found that did?
_________________________
.

.
"You will never find a real Human being - Even in a mirror." ....Mike Kremer.



Top
#31332 - 07/30/09 04:22 AM Re: A Brilliant IDEA [Re: Mike Kremer]
Amaranth Rose II Offline

Superstar

Registered: 12/16/06
Posts: 962
Loc: Southeast Nebraska, USA
I couldn't get your link to work. Do you have another?
_________________________
If you don't care for reality, just wait a while; another will be along shortly. --A Rose


Top



Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor
Facebook

We're on Facebook
Join Our Group

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact Us
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.