Welcome to
Science a GoGo's
Discussion Forums
Please keep your postings on-topic or they will be moved to a galaxy far, far away.
Your use of this forum indicates your agreement to our terms of use.
So that we remain spam-free, please note that all posts by new users are moderated.


The Forums
General Science Talk        Not-Quite-Science        Climate Change Discussion        Physics Forum        Science Fiction

Who's Online Now
0 members (), 388 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Posts
Top Posters(30 Days)
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#30567 05/01/09 07:52 PM
B
Bradmcquaid
Unregistered
Bradmcquaid
Unregistered
B
I understand the Sun is made up of lots of different gases and even some other elements. Can anyone explain to me why the Sun doesn't just explode. Are there any examples or analogies that are on earth that would relate why the sun burns at a constant rate or seemingly endless supply of whatever it is burning.
Maybe it cannot be thought of as burning as a candle does, or as vent fumes from an oil well. Someone please explain to me. Thanks in advance

.
#30568 05/01/09 08:57 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 498
Z
Superstar
Offline
Superstar
Z
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 498
Originally Posted By: Bradmcquaid
why the Sun doesn't just explode
Pressure of radiation prohibits the Sun in collapse and faster burning.

#30572 05/02/09 12:09 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,840
R
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
R
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,840
Before you get a reply from someone who really knows their stuff, I think I can safely say this much...

The sun's power source, i.e. the fusion of hydrogen into helium, creates sufficient outward pressure to prevent it collapsing under it's own gravity. In other words, it has hydrostatic equilibrium. However, the current prediction is that the sun will increase its energy output gradually, but enough to make Earth uninhabitable within a couple of billion years.

Eventually, about 5 billion years from now, the hydrogen core will be depleted. in the absence of internal radiation pressure, gravity will finally win, and the sun will implode then 'bounce', expanding to become a comparatively enormous red giant (beyond Earth orbit in radius). It will then be sustaining itself through fusing helium into carbon. Finally, when the helium is finished, the outer layers will be lost. It will become an Earth-sized white dwarf, which will cool, over billions of years, into a cold black lump of carbon called a black dwarf.

No black hole, neutron star, or spectacular supernova for a star as small as Sol. Just a lump of coal smile


"Time is what prevents everything from happening at once" - John Wheeler
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,840
R
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
R
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,840
Bradmcquaid, I'm sorry, my post above doesn't answer the 'constant rate' part of your question.

There are two related reasons.

(a) bearing in mind that the fusion takes place in the sun's core, not all the hydrogen atoms are in the core at any given time

(b) those hydrogen atoms that do happen to be in the core will not all simultaneously fuse into helium

It's a matter of chance - literally a hit and miss affair, governed by the laws of probability.

I hope that, added to the hydrostatic equilibrium already mentioned, makes it more clear.


"Time is what prevents everything from happening at once" - John Wheeler
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 498
Z
Superstar
Offline
Superstar
Z
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 498
Originally Posted By: redewenur
..Just a lump of coal smile
It can serve as an evidence of old theory , Sun is burning like huge piece of coal. Which basically means, the stellar evolution presented by you supports creation - because if the Universe would be older, then some 6,000 years, then the coal at the Sun would be depleted already. The existence of fossil fuel and chondrites rich of carbon supports the solar coal hypothesis as well... crazy


Zephir #30652 05/10/09 01:47 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,840
R
Megastar
Offline
Megastar
R
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,840
Zephir: "It can serve as an evidence of old theory , Sun is burning like huge piece of coal. Which basically means, the stellar evolution presented by you supports creation - because if the Universe would be older, then some 6,000 years, then the coal at the Sun would be depleted already."

Tut-tut. I should be careful to use plain English, avoiding humorous similes and the vernacular.
Not coal, just carbon, OK? smile

To repeat:

The carbon of which the black dwarf sun will be composed will be almost entirely manufactured from the fusion of helium during the red giant phase, following the depletion of hydrogen.


"Time is what prevents everything from happening at once" - John Wheeler

Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Members
debbieevans, bkhj, jackk, Johnmattison, RacerGT
865 Registered Users
Sponsor

Science a GoGo's Home Page | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact UsokÂþ»­¾W
Features | News | Books | Physics | Space | Climate Change | Health | Technology | Natural World

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Science a GoGo and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5